Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Watson not the only big name vet at QB that we're looking at?

ncfan

By ncfan,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

Jon Snow Grand Master

Jon Snow

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, Verge said:

People should definitely get it out of their minds that CMC wouldn't be potentially involved in the trade for Watson. Everything is on the table right now.

He won't be involved because nobody but Hurney would give CMC a contract like he has.  He's great but that contract makes him virtually untradable to any sane GM.  But stranger things have happened.  We would still be in the hook for the bonus money.  I just don't see any reasonable way you can pull it off.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
onmyown Grand Master

onmyown

Posted
Posted (edited)
28 minutes ago, BigCat#1 said:

I'll take anything over teddy

Which is this forums biggest problem. It’s not about last year or even this coming year, it’s the bigger picture.

Need to draft the next franchise QB and have patience.

Edited by onmyown
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
WarHeel Mentor

WarHeel

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, joemac said:

Now thats interesting.  I would be totally fine with Stafford and the weapons we have on offense.  He could put up video game numbers in our system.

Would likely be a whole helluva lot cheaper than Watson as wel.

This. I don’t think we need a Watson caliber player to compete for a Lombardi with the weapons we have as long as we protect the QB and don’t become anemic on defense. This move makes a lot of sense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
AU-panther Mentor

AU-panther

Posted
Posted
30 minutes ago, SOJA said:

Here would be my ideal power ranking of the options

1: Teddy, 8th this year, future first, and CMC for Watson 

2: Trade up to 2nd overall with #8, future first, and second this year. Draft Wilson

3: Trade a second rounder for Stafford 

Everyone keeps offering too little.  Jamal Adams went for two 1st, a safety.  Go look at the RG3 trade or the Mack trade.

Watson -  more like three 1st and a good player such as CMC or Burns, maybe a 2nd also or another player

2nd pick - Probably our next three 1st, RG3 was three 1st and and a 2nd.

Stafford - depending on where the team is picking, possible a 1st

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
BurnNChinn Grand Master

BurnNChinn

Posted
Posted
36 minutes ago, Verge said:

People should definitely get it out of their minds that CMC wouldn't be potentially involved in the trade for Watson. Everything is on the table right now.

And that is dumb as hell, just like when u thought Little should have been a first round pick for the Panthers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
kungfoodude Grand Master

kungfoodude

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, AU-panther said:

Everyone keeps offering too little.  Jamal Adams went for two 1st, a safety.  Go look at the RG3 trade or the Mack trade.

Watson -  more like three 1st and a good player such as CMC or Burns, maybe a 2nd also or another player

2nd pick - Probably our next three 1st, RG3 was three 1st and and a 2nd.

Stafford - depending on where the team is picking, possible a 1st

 

Remember that Watson can tank his trade value with that no trade clause. It isn't a "free market" trade scenario 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • rayzor
      Smith Sr. & Zierlein discuss their top 10 WRs

      By rayzor · Posted

      I watched it this afternoon and I thought some of the best discussions was before it even got to the players. One thing that really jumped out to me was when Smitty was asked about how things have changed since he played and the thing he talked about was how when he played and going back to Jerry Rice says, the #1 targeted or looked to receiver was always the X and there's still a lot of people who's minds are still stuck in that idea. But what has happened is that the, what he calls, the F receiver...the flanker...is now the go to guy. You need the X to try and get safeties out of the box, but the QB is now looking for his flanker most of the time. Lots of good discussions all through it, but for some reason the ones involving Ladd, Corley, and Leggette was the most interesting. Ladd was how he may be best fit for just the slot, but he's the best slot guy in the draft and he's just a guy who gets open and doesn't drop the ball. Corley and Leggette are playmakers who are at a risk of being pigeonholed. Leggette is too stiff to be a slot guy but he can do things like Metcalf. Corley is likely to be used much as he was in college, as the big playmaker you just get the ball in his hands however you can, but he's got a lot of room for development as a receiver. It's just good football talk all the way through  
    • ClawOn
      Ask The Old Guy: We will, we will mock you

      By ClawOn · Posted

      I'd resigned myself to 2000 and never.   Cautiously optimistic based on this off season that 2026 is a real possibility. 
    • toldozer
      Selling a home and the related commisions

      By toldozer · Posted

      In Charlotte in the lower price points it's still tough. 300 and under I'd say. Granted I haven't worked with a residential buyer other than 1 friend looking at expensive new builds in about a year so I could be out of touch but if rates Dip down again that would be a likely scenario 
×
×
  • Create New...