Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Carolina Panthers to be 'aggressive' in pursuit of potential Deshaun Watson trade


Proudiddy
 Share

Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, OneBadCat said:

If anyone has to go it would and should be Burns. We can generate a pass rush by committee and bring in specialists. Can’t replace the best RB in the league and the best safety we’ve had in years.

If we land him the defense regresses further that's a given IMO.... Getting an oline to utilize all those weapons... how?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, TrevorLaurenceTime22 said:

If we land him the defense regresses further that's a given IMO.... Getting an oline to utilize all those weapons... how?

I don’t know how these things are certain.   Guys like Brown? Chinn? Will just get better.      Shouldn’t be hard for us to improve at LB over what we had last year IMO.   We still will have draft picks, players improving and rentals. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, TrevorLaurenceTime22 said:

He's been spot on many things in the past, insider source, including but not limited to Irvin to the Seahawks at 16 when general consensus was that he was a low 2nd high third prospect.

 

*Little is trash*

Yeah that’s what I told him and he kept saying oh no he will go in first round and be really good. I told him he would be wrong on both so yeah I really don’t think he knows. If y’all want to believe some nobody that’s fine.

  • Beer 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, TrevorLaurenceTime22 said:

He's been spot on many things in the past, insurer source, including but not limited to Irvin to the Seahawks at 16 when general consensus was that he was a low 2nd high third prospect.

Didn’t you know that if you don’t hit on 100% of your info, you’re a fraud? 

Little was a scouting error that many pros do more often than not. But apparently we have many here that just never got the chance to showcase their scouting chops.

  • Flames 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, BurnNChinn said:

Yeah that’s what I told him and he kept saying oh no he will go in first round and be really good. I told him he would be wrong on both so yeah I really don’t think he knows. If y’all want to believe some nobody that’s fine.

I remember, the Panthers didn't expect Burns to drop to them, In his infinite wisdom we all know Hurndog would have taken Little in round one and prove Verge right.

  • Poo 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • So you're telling me there's a chance!
    • Actually, Pesce is not usually our worst defenseman on grade on average and usually is middle of the pack to high on stat card solo.  Something people need to remember is for defensive lines in the NHL over 800 minutes. We take 1, 5 and 9 x goal against per 60. 1, 10, 20 x goal against(skjei/pesce is the 10. 2, 3, 11, x goal. Individually, Pesce is second on the team in blocks and per 60 it’s a country mile. Has a 5.8 x goal despite having little offense. TDA is a 1.8. Pesce also has our least amount of defensive zone giveaways with 14. To put that in perspective he has 18 give away in 1400 minutes, Orlov has 17 defensive zone giveaways in the same amount of time(36 total). TDA has 14 giveaways with 8 defensive zone giveaways in 440 minutes.    TDA and Pesce are not the same. Y’all give Pesce far too little credit to how well he plays in rods system. 
    • If it is a player that we know we would like a 5th year option, it could be wise to do so.  However, the trade would have to be with KC or SF, imo--and they would be losing the fifth year option.  I do not think the odds are 20%--I would say 10%, based only on my hunches.   This is the "F YOU, FITTERER!!!" Draft.  Last year was the "F YOU, PANTHER FANS!!" Draft:
×
×
  • Create New...