Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

How close did the Panthers come to getting Stafford? Dang close.


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, kungfoodude said:

@Iron Saint Get your ass in here and explain to me what the deal is with The Golden Calf of Bristol 2.0 starting over Jameis Winston. What is the behind the scene story with Winston? How does Sean Payton start fuging Taysom fuging Hill over Winston?? The man started a fuging backup TE over a former NFL starter. 

Sean Payton has a giant ego and they gave Hill 21 million dollars making him one of the highest paid backups in the league.  Winston had a 1 million dollar contract. That had something to do with it I think. Not all but some. People talked mad poo about Sean giving that kind of money to a shitty, average player. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, TheSpecialJuan said:

The aggressiveness of this trade proposal make it seem like Fitterer realized Deshaun Watson was not going to happen and Stafford was the best QB option out there. 

I don’t think it’s a matter of “not going to happen” but stafford was a certainty that was 100% available for trade and didn’t involve trading the next two years of picks away to get. That being said, we will be in the conversation if Watson officially goes on the block and this is encouraging as well....

 

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.tigernet.com/amp/update/Report-Deshaun-Watson-has-interest-in-playing-for-Panthers-37306

Edited by TheCasillas
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, SmokinwithWilly said:

Brett Favre is the closest I can think of. 400/5 one week and 200/1/4 the next. Favre was obviously better, but the erratic decisions are the closest I can think of.

His career stats to this point and Favre's are almost dead even. I did a detailed statistical breakdown of that on here last offseason(I think). The similarity was amazing.

The question is, does anyone in the league have the stomach for a QB as erratic as Favre in the modern game?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Maybe not that close

“What’s accurate is — and this is an incredible thing by [the Lions] — I asked to go to a team that was ready to win a championship,” Stafford said. “And, you know, there were a few teams on that list. There were a few teams that were not on that list. And they were respectful of that and understood completely. I had thoughts and reasons for each one of them.”

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, Ivan The Awesome said:

lol people in here acting like Stafford is a bad QB. smh.

It’s not that he’s “bad” he’s just not going to elevate a bad team. He never has. If you have a good team around him then he’ll do well. He’s going to do well enough in LA to make people believe we should have tried harder to get him. They’re going to be wrong, he doesn’t have the same type of value on a team like this. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, AceBoogie said:

It’s not that he’s “bad” he’s just not going to elevate a bad team. He never has. If you have a good team around him then he’ll do well. He’s going to do well enough in LA to make people believe we should have tried harder to get him. They’re going to be wrong, he doesn’t have the same type of value on a team like this. 

I think I’m a little bit higher on him than you. He’s like, really good. But we were not in position to trade for a 33 year old player lmao

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, NAS said:

Maybe not that close

“What’s accurate is — and this is an incredible thing by [the Lions] — I asked to go to a team that was ready to win a championship,” Stafford said. “And, you know, there were a few teams on that list. There were a few teams that were not on that list. And they were respectful of that and understood completely. I had thoughts and reasons for each one of them.”

Exchanging medical information is like one step away from completion, so yeah it was that close.

The Panthers weren't Stafford's first choice, and that's all we really know. But even if they were one of the teams he didn't want, he didn't have any leverage to stop a trade. And the Lions only agreed they would try to send him to a place he wanted to go, but only if it was also advantageous to them.

Los Angeles upping their final offer made it work out. If not for that, he'd likely be on his way here now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, AceBoogie said:

It’s not that he’s “bad” he’s just not going to elevate a bad team. He never has. If you have a good team around him then he’ll do well. He’s going to do well enough in LA to make people believe we should have tried harder to get him. They’re going to be wrong, he doesn’t have the same type of value on a team like this. 

Like Watson. Like pretty much every QB outside of Brady maybe

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Got to think he wouldn't have been thrilled to come here given his explanation of what he wanted and how they were cooperating to help meet those. They didn't actually do the medical swap. That just sounds anecdotal stuff thrown in to make something sound interesting. We have no idea how close almost providing medical info means in the big picture but it sounds interesting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • 4 AZ plan: -Stay at 4 and take MHJ. -Trade back to 6 with NYG or NE (* see ) and still take MHJ. 5 LAC plan: -Stay at 5 and take OT Alt (or I’m hearing maybe Latham over Alt?). -Move back to 11 and take OT Latham. 6 NYG plan: -Plan A: Want to move up to 3 for Maye. Don’t think NE will agree to move, but that’s what I hear NYG wants most. -Plan B: Odunze. I’m told they’re not gonna risk another OBJ/K. Toney situation. 7 TEN plan: -Take OT Alt if he’s still available (which could happen if LAC moved out of 5 and a QB was taken there. -Take OT Latham ***ATL at 8 and CHI at 9 could have multiple offers to trade back when they get on the clock, as teams behind them could be jockeying to move up for one of these guys: QB McCarthy, WR Nabers or Odunze, OT Alt or Latham, and TE Bowers. 8 ATL plan: -Take the top DEF player in the draft (EDGE Turner or DT Murphy) -Trade back a few spots and still take best available DEF player (EDGE Turner, DT Murphy or CB Arnold) 9 CHI plan: -Trade back and recover picks (only four picks this year). -DT Murphy II or best-available WR/EDGE/OT would be priorities after trade down. -Only caveat; CHI could stick at pick No. 9 if Odunze or Nabers falls. 10 NYJ plan: -Best available weapon for Aaron (Nabers, Odunze, Bowers) or LOT protector Aaron (insurance in ‘24 and long-term). -Can’t rule out a slight trade up (for a weapon) or a trade down (probably would wind up with OT at that point). 11 MIN plan: -Trade up for Maye -Trade up for JJ (but only if it doesn’t require breaking the bank with draft picks!) *I hear there’s a real cost-analysis going on in Minn… is it better to keep picks and land Penix at 11 or to pay a haul to move up for JJ. Very interesting debate! -Stay home at 11 and hope JJ falls. If not, take Penix. Finally, Saints, Rams, Steelers and Eagles are making a LOT of calls about moving up (NO = OT). And teams I’m hearing have interest in potentially moving up for TE Brock Bowers: -IND -JAX
    • My preference would be to move back 10 spots and pick up another 3rd.   Then I go 39. LB (wilson) 43. WR (leggett) 64. Edge (kneeland) 80. RB (benson) 101. TE (sinnott or wiley) 141. CB 142. C 240. WR (mcCringleberry)
    • https://www.sportskeeda.com/nfl/news-insider-notes-2024-nfl-draft-rams-eyeing-intriguing-trade-up-vikings-beginning-panic-qb-room     few nugs in there
×
×
  • Create New...