Latest NFL.com mock has us trading up to #2 for Zach Wilson

[Ornias]

This years picks, ok. Next years 1st, no. Wilson is not a guarantee of anything. If you are going that deep just offer the house to Houston. 

[Pantherzack179812]

5 hours ago, Ship said:

This kid looks like a douche to me therefore I don’t want him

Honestly he strikes me as Clausen 2.0

[GoPanthers123]

I’d rather go for 3 or 4, Fields is fine too.

Edited February 9, 2021 by GoPanthers123

[Mr. Scot]

5 hours ago, Ship said:

This kid looks like a douche to me therefore I don’t want him

A pretty big douche won his seventh Super Bowl this weekend.

[Daddy_Uncle]

Again, mock drafts mean absolutely nothing and imo are pointless to talk about

[Waldo]

3 to 5 is the sweet spot. Looking at Lance. 

[DC Amp]

Nope

[TheCasillas]

5 hours ago, Ship said:

This kid looks like a douche to me therefore I don’t want him

Looks are everything when it comes to judging nfl talent. 

[BurnNChinn]

Read if Bengals get tackle in FA they will go after Pitts in the draft. That’s the spot I would go for wouldn’t cost as much and bengals would still get Pitts

[LxDunn]

[Basbear]

Prefer to stay put, I hate all these give up 5 great picks for one player type deals for the panthers. We need about 25 players, 1 player will not cover that amount. Unless Watson/wilson can block 4 DLmen, cover teams #2 WR, play OLB and MLB, TE and backup TE/OL/DL/LB/CB/Flex.

 

[The Huddler]

some of yall whine for a QB but don't want to give up what it takes to get one. 

[BurnNChinn]

If I’m giving up so much to get a rookie qb, I’m just going to give up a little more for a proven one. We ain’t getting Lawrence and there is no way I’m giving up all these picks for Wilson or Fields terrible idea.

[Mother Grabber]

only one extra first plus a few mid-round picks to have our choice of wilson or fields. hellz yes. totes worth it to have our guy.