Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Report- KK Short has been cut


trueblade
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, stbugs said:

How about just releasing dead weight? I know Marty clearly never understood the whole cap rollover concept but this might not be for anything other than Short isn’t close to worth his $13M in salary this year.

But if he was a post June 1 cut - he would have gave us even more back. Right?

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, stbugs said:

It honestly doesn’t matter. You can’t really use the extra money until after June 1st so for a team like us who’s still rebuilding it’s almost the same either way. Post June 1st and rolled over or free up more space next year. With cap rollover it’s almost the same. If we were competing and wanted flexibility to add someone expensive via trade later on on, sure, but not us. 

Big difference between having an extra $5M come available on 6/2 compared to nothing at all.

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, stbugs said:

How about just releasing dead weight? I know Marty clearly never understood the whole cap rollover concept but this might not be for anything other than Short isn’t close to worth his $13M in salary this year.

Yeah but why not designate him as a June 1st cut and lessen the dead money?

That is what makes me wonder if something else isn't imminent.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • 4 AZ plan: -Stay at 4 and take MHJ. -Trade back to 6 with NYG or NE (* see ) and still take MHJ. 5 LAC plan: -Stay at 5 and take OT Alt (or I’m hearing maybe Latham over Alt?). -Move back to 11 and take OT Latham. 6 NYG plan: -Plan A: Want to move up to 3 for Maye. Don’t think NE will agree to move, but that’s what I hear NYG wants most. -Plan B: Odunze. I’m told they’re not gonna risk another OBJ/K. Toney situation. 7 TEN plan: -Take OT Alt if he’s still available (which could happen if LAC moved out of 5 and a QB was taken there. -Take OT Latham ***ATL at 8 and CHI at 9 could have multiple offers to trade back when they get on the clock, as teams behind them could be jockeying to move up for one of these guys: QB McCarthy, WR Nabers or Odunze, OT Alt or Latham, and TE Bowers. 8 ATL plan: -Take the top DEF player in the draft (EDGE Turner or DT Murphy) -Trade back a few spots and still take best available DEF player (EDGE Turner, DT Murphy or CB Arnold) 9 CHI plan: -Trade back and recover picks (only four picks this year). -DT Murphy II or best-available WR/EDGE/OT would be priorities after trade down. -Only caveat; CHI could stick at pick No. 9 if Odunze or Nabers falls. 10 NYJ plan: -Best available weapon for Aaron (Nabers, Odunze, Bowers) or LOT protector Aaron (insurance in ‘24 and long-term). -Can’t rule out a slight trade up (for a weapon) or a trade down (probably would wind up with OT at that point). 11 MIN plan: -Trade up for Maye -Trade up for JJ (but only if it doesn’t require breaking the bank with draft picks!) *I hear there’s a real cost-analysis going on in Minn… is it better to keep picks and land Penix at 11 or to pay a haul to move up for JJ. Very interesting debate! -Stay home at 11 and hope JJ falls. If not, take Penix. Finally, Saints, Rams, Steelers and Eagles are making a LOT of calls about moving up (NO = OT). And teams I’m hearing have interest in potentially moving up for TE Brock Bowers: -IND -JAX
    • My preference would be to move back 10 spots and pick up another 3rd.   Then I go 39. LB (wilson) 43. WR (leggett) 64. Edge (kneeland) 80. RB (benson) 101. TE (sinnott or wiley) 141. CB 142. C 240. WR (mcCringleberry)
    • https://www.sportskeeda.com/nfl/news-insider-notes-2024-nfl-draft-rams-eyeing-intriguing-trade-up-vikings-beginning-panic-qb-room     few nugs in there
×
×
  • Create New...