Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Tre Boston released


electro's horse
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I was assuming we designated it a post-June 1st. I just read that we didn't.

No, that was the discussion at the time. It seemed to be making cap space available immediately, versus having more space available next offseason. 

That was why the speculation about a Moton deal being imminent popped up. The only logical reason to cut him prior to June 2nd was to free up immediate money to spend.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Untouchable said:

If I remember right, they started using him closer to the box which was not the role he was meant for when signed. 

If that's what they're looking for from our FS Chinn might be the new starting S.

Which I'm not against.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, electro's horse said:

does anyone else just always combine tre boston and charles godfrey into one player

yes haha

Also--I felt like this was quite expected and I think there's a tad oversight with how much Rhule & co. like Burris.  Burris is a Rhule signing and the secondary got noticeably better when he came back from his mid-season injury.

I feel like Burris & Chinn is a solid situation.  CB1 is the real need.

 

Edited by davos
  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, davos said:

yes haha

Also--I felt like this was quite expected and I think there's a tad oversight with how much Rhule & co. like Burris.  Burris is a Rhule signing and the secondary got noticeably better when he came back from his mid-season injury.

I feel like Burris in the outfield and Chinn in the box is a solid situation.  CB1 is the real need.

 

We should have never let Bradbury walk out the door.

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, joemac said:

We should have never let Bradbury walk out the door.

I mean, he was pricey but we should have targeted a much better signing than the scrap heap. 

But what that tells me we didn't see a guy we wanted to commit long term money to in FA and weren't in position during the draft (I realllly wanted Kristian Fulton R2 but am muuuch happier w/ Chinn).  It's circumstantial and CB & LB were the positions that just didn't present good upgrades after we found what we wanted during the draft.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


×
×
  • Create New...