Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Go on record. Who still wants Watson?


Sasquatch
 Share

Recommended Posts

14 minutes ago, jackson113 said:

Finger in the Ole Anus..😬

7BDB5E03-D970-49AC-84A6-66E91B757152.png

See I cringe when I read this, yuck. However, she stated that she would not entertain his sexual advances. He did not force it further, he did not go into her no-no square. Is this creepy? yes. Does Watson seemingly have issues? yes. Is this illegal? That is the question.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Agent Blue said:

Unless you were there or there was video or audio evidence or a confession, no one should tell a alleged victim they are lying or tell the accused they are guilty. 

At best we can only have opinions. 

There is probably no dumber, more ill informed take available than "unless there's video, we can't be sure".

(ranks right up there with the CSI effect)

Edited by Mr. Scot
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, philit99 said:

See I cringe when I read this, yuck. However, she stated that she would not entertain his sexual advances. He did not force it further, he did not go into her no-no square. Is this creepy? yes. Does Watson seemingly have issues? yes. Is this illegal? That is the question.

Technically, what Jerry Richardson did isn't "illegal".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Agent Blue said:

We are deep into cancel culture / metoo. These women would have been A OK had they came forward earlier to police. As that looks better than waiting and going civil. 

You could say the same about Bill Cosby, Harvey Weinstein, Matt Lauer and just about every rich person with power that has done things similar to what Watson is being accused of. None of those victims went to the police right away yet all 3 of these men are guilty. 25 accusers doesn’t look good and no team is interested in Watson until there is some more clarity. Please move on....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Mr. Scot said:

There is probably no dumber, more I'll informed take available than "unless there's video, we can't be sure".

(ranks right up there with the CSI effect)

Please inform us how you can be sure of sexual assault if 

1) You were not present to actually see or hear said incident. 

2) You have seen no video of said incident. 

3) You have heard no audio of said incident. 

4) You have seen or heard no confession of said incident. 

#goesandgrabspopcorn

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Agent Blue said:

Please inform us how you can be sure of sexual assault if 

1) You were not present to actually see or hear said incident. 

2) You have seen no video of said incident. 

3) You have heard no audio of said incident. 

4) You have seen or heard no confession of said incident. 

#goesandgrabspopcorn

I tend to believe 25 women telling essentially the same story

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Agent Blue said:

Please inform us how you can be sure of sexual assault if 

1) You were not present to actually see or hear said incident. 

2) You have seen no video of said incident. 

3) You have heard no audio of said incident. 

4) You have seen or heard no confession of said incident. 

#goesandgrabspopcorn

Guys who are guilty of rape would absolutely love to have someone like you on their jury.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Mr. Scot said:

Guys who are guilty of rape would absolutely love to have someone like you on their jury.

I would go off the evidence available. 

I would not convict anyone on some he said she said. 

Gotta be something more. 

There is an old saying. Goes like i'd rather 100 criminals walk free than convict and imprison 1 innocent man. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Money, power and fame also help a lot of these guys get away with the stuff they do.

I agree Mr Scot. My issue is the number of complaints that happen well after the fact, as if to simply pile on to something you condoned at the time. I honestly think Watson has issues, but this just seems like character assassination or a money grab, revenge deal.

Edited by philit99
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Any QB worth his weight in gold is going to get his guys the ball. Of course he has to have the protection, coaching and experience to do that. Moreover, it has yet to be determined what type of situation this is for a rookie wideout. The most important thing that will determine that is coaching.
    • I watched it this afternoon and I thought some of the best discussions was before it even got to the players. One thing that really jumped out to me was when Smitty was asked about how things have changed since he played and the thing he talked about was how when he played and going back to Jerry Rice says, the #1 targeted or looked to receiver was always the X and there's still a lot of people who's minds are still stuck in that idea. But what has happened is that the, what he calls, the F receiver...the flanker...is now the go to guy. You need the X to try and get safeties out of the box, but the QB is now looking for his flanker most of the time. Lots of good discussions all through it, but for some reason the ones involving Ladd, Corley, and Leggette was the most interesting. Ladd was how he may be best fit for just the slot, but he's the best slot guy in the draft and he's just a guy who gets open and doesn't drop the ball. Corley and Leggette are playmakers who are at a risk of being pigeonholed. Leggette is too stiff to be a slot guy but he can do things like Metcalf. Corley is likely to be used much as he was in college, as the big playmaker you just get the ball in his hands however you can, but he's got a lot of room for development as a receiver. It's just good football talk all the way through  
    • I'd resigned myself to 2000 and never.   Cautiously optimistic based on this off season that 2026 is a real possibility. 
×
×
  • Create New...