Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Go on record. Who still wants Watson?


Sasquatch
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, CRA said:

Still a Jane Doe.  Still an odd story.   Where did they find her?  Look her up on Instagram and reach out? She work out of her home?   We don’t know anything.  

you seem to be super fixated on Watson’s guilt be determined right now.  

I’m not advocating for a trade now.  And if he gets off with a slap on the wrist and is shown to be a pervert but maybe not an actually criminal....that doesn’t mean I want him here then either. 

This is how I know you haven't read the story, because those questions are answered in the article.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Smittymoose said:

I agree it’s too toxic to touch, definitely this offseason and maybe forever. The settlement is pretty likely to be a nothingburger. Regardless of how legitimate any or all of these claims are, he’s not going to admit anything, and they’ll likely all take a confidential paycheck and move along, as is standard. 

Maybe, but I could also see a case where the defense becomes "okay, technically he did it but he has a mental problem so it's not really his fault." Heaven knows that defense gets used plenty.

Heck, they've already tacitly admitted to a sexual encounter happening with one of the accusers but said it was consensual. Could se more of that too.

It's not a good look, but I suspect they'll care more about whether it's effective.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Sports illustrated knows exactly who she is, and what her credentials are. That's why they reached out to her. You not knowing who she is doesn't delegitimize those things.

And again, civil court doesn't work that way. There's no presumption of innocence in a lawsuit.

Why would SI reach out to her before they knew she that she did Watson? Also if they saw text of her telling friends and relatives of Watson's behavior, why didn't they publish the contents and time stamps? This sounds more like massage parlor porn, than a rich single professional athlete trying to get some facetime.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, CRA said:

Still a Jane Doe.  Still an odd story.   Where did they find her?  Look her up on Instagram and reach out? She work out of her home?   We don’t know anything.  

you seem to be super fixated on Watson’s guilt being determined right now.  

I’m not advocating for a trade now.  And if he gets off with a slap on the wrist and is shown to be a pervert but maybe not an actual criminal....that doesn’t mean I want him here then either.  He isn’t Panther relevant at this point.

If you are not interested in following the story please stop posting

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

This is how I know you haven't read the story, because those questions are answered in the article.

What I read stated they reached out to her.  Didn’t say how.  Said she owned her own business.  Clarified nothing more than that.    Said they vetted her by talking to one of her family members and reading texts/social media posts.  

Whatever you read, I missed.  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, CRA said:

What I read stated they reached out to her.  Didn’t say how.  Said she owned her own business.  Clarified nothing more than that. Said they vetted her by talking to one of her family members and reading texts/social media posts.  

Whatever you read, I missed.  

You wanted to hear from a licensed massage therapist. From the story:

She is a licensed massage therapist who owns her own business in Houston.

You asked if she worked out of her home and said "we don't know anything". Again, from the story:

She met Watson when he arrived at her rented office space in the fall of 2019.

And besides the vetting, they also reached out to Watson's attorney. His response was basically "I don't have time to talk about this. We're busy!"

I'd add that you previously referred to all the accusers as "a bunch of nobodies", like Watson being famous and them being unknown somehow invalidated everything. Is that the path you're sticking with?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Mr. Scot said:

You wanted to hear from a licensed massage therapist. From the story:

She is a licensed massage therapist who owns her own business in Houston.

You asked if she worked out of her home and said "we don't know anything". Again, from the story:

She met Watson when he arrived at her rented office space in the fall of 2019.

And besides the vetting, they also reached out to Watson's attorney. His response was basically "I don't have time to talk about this. We're busy!"

I'd add that you previously referred to all the accusers as "a bunch of nobodies", like Watson being famous and them being unknown somehow invalidated everything. Is that the path you're sticking with?

what page is that post on?  The bunch of nobodies? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Don't know if it's even in this thread, but I remember replying to it.

Well if you find it, let me know.

maybe I ruffled your feathers somewhere.  Not the intent.   Have a good night.  

“nobodies” isn’t a very popular word oddly enough around here.   would have thought with some of our units we have put together we would have used it more on the board. Shows up twice recently.  You accusing me of saying it and me responding.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Doc Holiday said:

They are not the same situation. Ben had 1 accuser. Watson has 20+.

 

Ben was accused twice of sexual assault, once of rape. 
 

watson is more or less being accused of being naked for a massage. 
 

not defending him, but my gut says this is going nowhere because of no criminal accusations. Ben slipped through because the DA didn’t have enough evidence. That said, if we are comparing the nature of the accusations, Ben’s incidents were much more concerning.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/20/2021 at 9:36 AM, CRA said:

Still too much unknown to call it any which way.  

if it never evolves past a bunch of anonymous Jane Does making allegations and nothing more? 

Watson and the Texans aren’t screwed yet.   It’s the NFL.   He would just keep playing and everyone would forget about it at large.   Not advocating that is right.  But again, look at superstars in the NFL and more specifically the only QB comparable which is Big Ben.   

@Mr. Scot

This is the post.  And it isn’t exactly calling them “a bunch of nobodies” as your context implied IMO.  

It merely was alluding to the fact it needs to evolve past only being Jane Doe allegations at some point.  Which I think it has to do at some point.  

and I made sure to note that the NFL doing what it does isn’t necessarily the right thing ...just because the NFL does it.  

and I realize this is a sensitive topic.  So again, I’m not trying to ruffle your feathers.   I’ve read your post.   I know it is a personal topic. Went searching because I was legitimately going to amend the post if it was what you stated.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, CRA said:

@Mr. Scot

This is the post.  And it isn’t exactly calling them “a bunch of nobodies” as your context implied IMO.  

It merely was alluding to the fact it needs to evolve past only being Jane Doe allegations at some point.  Which I think it has to do at some point.  

and I made sure to note that the NFL doing what it does isn’t necessarily the right thing ...just because the NFL does it.  

and I realize this is a sensitive topic.  So again, I’m not trying to ruffle your feathers.   I’ve read your post.   I know it is a personal topic. Went searching because I was legitimately going to amend the post if it was what you stated.  

Fair enough.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Asurfaholic said:

Ben was accused twice of sexual assault, once of rape. 

watson is more or less being accused of being naked for a massage. 

not defending him, but my gut says this is going nowhere because of no criminal accusations. Ben slipped through because the DA didn’t have enough evidence. That said, if we are comparing the nature of the accusations, Ben’s incidents were much more concerning.  

Yeah, it's not just "being naked". Three different women have accused him of forcing them to perform oral sex.

Also worth remembering that if you expose yourself in areas where you're not supposed to or where it's unwanted, that's enough to get you arrested.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


×
×
  • Create New...