Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

so we haven't picked up the option?


Panthero
 Share

Recommended Posts

You can learn a lot about a person in just a couple of weeks. Like if the last team left him with any lingering traumas. 

They may also look at negotiating an entire contract now while his resume` looks less promising, offering incentives rather than guarantees.

 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, tijo said:

Will depend on:

1. How well Sam performs this year, 2. If Fields/Lance falls to us and he shows he's ready by next year. 

 

We only have until the day after the draft to claim the option.  If we don't he's a free agent after the 2021 season.

  • Beer 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, panfanman said:

We only have until the day after the draft to claim the option.  If we don't he's a free agent after the 2021 season.

Didnt know that info, thx. Still works for draft leverage i think. Really after the first round, they can extend him if thats the plan. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't see a reason to do so. If Darnold flies off the handle and becomes Mr. Franchise QB the team will have no problem opening their pocketbooks for him. In the more likely event he sucks a big fat twinkie, the team owes him nothing next year. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

I kind of doubt we traded away a second round pick just for a one year tryout.

That'd be pretty dumb, honestly.

I would think having another failed QB with a 19M guarantee would be much dumber. Even if he goes Tannehill his first year wouldn’t be that much. What possible reason would a team guarantee that much to a QB in hopes he becomes something he’s never been before? Especially for the 2nd year in a row. 

  • Beer 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Toomers said:

I would think having another failed QB with a 19M guarantee would be much dumber. Even if he goes Tannehill his first year wouldn’t be that much. What possible reason would a team guarantee that much to a QB in hopes he becomes something he’s never been before? Especially for the 2nd year in a row. 

They can restructure the contract to spread the hit evenly.

Speculation has been that this is the plan.

Edited by Mr. Scot
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Mr. Scot said:

They can restructure the contract to spread the hit evenly.

In what way won’t they be paying the same amount?  How does this restructure work? Is it kicking money onto this year? Because I keep hearing this but not one person has explained how it works. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Toomers said:

In what way won’t they be paying the same amount?  How does this restructure work? Is it kicking money onto this year? Because I keep hearing this but not one person has explained how it works. 

I think that's what they want to do.  Move some money forward into this year if they can get Teddy off the books.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • According to ESPN stats, the Tampa Bay Buccaneers are 24th in the league in motion at the snap, only using it 14% of the time. The team does employ motion before the snap quite frequently, though, as it runs motion %43.7 of the time in general. When asked specifically about motion at the snap, Bucs offensive coordinator Dave Canales confirmed that it's in Tampa Bay's arsenal and that it can be a big help on offense. "It's a part of what we're doing," Canales said. "It allows us to stretch the defense horizontally. All you're trying to do is create a moment of indecision for the defense and then that helps the run game, helps the pass game. Switching the responsibilities to create free-access releases at the line, that's a big part of it." Tampa Bay's low percentage of using this type of play doesn't mean that it won't increase in the future, though. Canales said that while some teams are doing a great job at implementing it in their offense, others like the Bucs are catching up to speed. He mentioned that he first saw heavy usage of pre-snap motion when he was with the Seattle Seahawks and played the Los Angeles Rams twice a year. "[The Los Angeles Rams] really utilized that from the time Sean [McVay] had been there in LA. It's something that's been around for a while, and I think that the rest of us are learning how to utilize it."
    • Yea Falcons should (and hopefully will) get slammed hard for this tampering business. But even without that, Kirk Cousins is solid but the team still isn’t good. Their O is super overhyped based on college production. The RB they got last year looks good but he’s no Barkley or CMC. Their young WR and TE are dookie no matter how much people wanna hype them based on their college days. (And by dookie I mean compared to expectations. They’re mid, objectively). 
×
×
  • Create New...