Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Verge's 2021 Mock Draft


Verge
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

Well, maybe this will help.

There were guys Tepper wanted for the GM job, including guys that nobody else was interviewing (seriously, Brandt Tillis?) and there were guys that Matt Rhule wanted for the GM job.

None of Tepper's guys even made it to the second round. Rhule won that debate.

I'd call that a reason for hope.

And here you were....almost talking me into hoping that Tepper had rounded a corner.

Man...black cat and all...we are snakebitten.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Verge said:

Sewell > Horn > Waddle > Slater 
Is how I understand it 

People are talking about how deep CB is---and it is. 

How deep is CB1?   I count 2 or 3.  Full stop.  We need CB1 here, and Verge has stated it that way----accurately.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, MHS831 said:

People are talking about how deep CB is---and it is. 

How deep is CB1?   I count 2 or 3.  Full stop.  We need CB1 here, and Verge has stated it that way----accurately.

CB1 is probably Horn, Surtain, Newsome, and Farley. That's it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Verge said:

We are also very high on Farley. Just a matter of where you take him with the injury.

He was my favorite coming in--guessing that he is the pick if we trade back with NE or WFT.  I don't really like Darrisaw as much the more I watch him, so I am hoping CB 1 in round 1

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

He was my favorite coming in--guessing that he is the pick if we trade back with NE or WFT.  I don't really like Darrisaw as much the more I watch him, so I am hoping CB 1 in round 1

I need to know how much weight Farley was pulling when f’d up his back 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • According to ESPN stats, the Tampa Bay Buccaneers are 24th in the league in motion at the snap, only using it 14% of the time. The team does employ motion before the snap quite frequently, though, as it runs motion %43.7 of the time in general. When asked specifically about motion at the snap, Bucs offensive coordinator Dave Canales confirmed that it's in Tampa Bay's arsenal and that it can be a big help on offense. "It's a part of what we're doing," Canales said. "It allows us to stretch the defense horizontally. All you're trying to do is create a moment of indecision for the defense and then that helps the run game, helps the pass game. Switching the responsibilities to create free-access releases at the line, that's a big part of it." Tampa Bay's low percentage of using this type of play doesn't mean that it won't increase in the future, though. Canales said that while some teams are doing a great job at implementing it in their offense, others like the Bucs are catching up to speed. He mentioned that he first saw heavy usage of pre-snap motion when he was with the Seattle Seahawks and played the Los Angeles Rams twice a year. "[The Los Angeles Rams] really utilized that from the time Sean [McVay] had been there in LA. It's something that's been around for a while, and I think that the rest of us are learning how to utilize it."
    • Yea Falcons should (and hopefully will) get slammed hard for this tampering business. But even without that, Kirk Cousins is solid but the team still isn’t good. Their O is super overhyped based on college production. The RB they got last year looks good but he’s no Barkley or CMC. Their young WR and TE are dookie no matter how much people wanna hype them based on their college days. (And by dookie I mean compared to expectations. They’re mid, objectively). 
×
×
  • Create New...