Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The QB School 2021 NFL Draft - QB rankings


OldhamA
 Share

Recommended Posts

JT is pretty thorough when you're looking at just film study.  He's very open about the fact he hasn't actually talked to any of the prospects and bases his opinion purely on the film.  He'd probably make a pretty darn good QB coach if he wanted to go that route.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For a comparison, last years ranking:

 

1) Tua

2) Burrow

3) Jake Fromm

4) Jordan Love

5) Nate Stanley (Iowa)

6) Anthony Gordon (Wash. St.)

7) Jalen Hurts

8. Justin Herbert

9) Jacob Eason

10) Steven Montez (Colorado)

 

Maybe not the best guy to go to for rankings.  Excellent film breakdown though, very educational.  

Edited by shaka
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, shaka said:

For a comparison, last years ranking:

 

1) Tua

2) Burrow

3) Jake Fromm

4) Jordan Love

5) Nate Stanley (Iowa)

6) Anthony Gordon (Wash. St.)

7) Jalen Hurts

8. Justin Herbert

9) Jacob Eason

10) Steven Montez (Colorado)

 

Maybe not the best guy to go to for rankings.  Excellent film breakdown though, very educational.  

His rankings are strictly off of film. Nothing else. He doesn’t talk to scouts or the kids to get a feel for how successful he thinks they will be in the pros. He’s ranking them on the bits of film he watches which is typically not every game each year. 
 

There is no go-to guy for ranking how prospects will turn out in the pros. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, shaka said:

For a comparison, last years ranking:

 

1) Tua

2) Burrow

3) Jake Fromm

4) Jordan Love

5) Nate Stanley (Iowa)

6) Anthony Gordon (Wash. St.)

7) Jalen Hurts

8. Justin Herbert

9) Jacob Eason

10) Steven Montez (Colorado)

 

Maybe not the best guy to go to for rankings.  Excellent film breakdown though, very educational.  

Ouch.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, Varking said:

His rankings are strictly off of film. Nothing else. He doesn’t talk to scouts or the kids to get a feel for how successful he thinks they will be in the pros. He’s ranking them on the bits of film he watches which is typically not every game each year. 
 

There is no go-to guy for ranking how prospects will turn out in the pros. 

Oh yea, absolutely agree.  He even gives like 10 minutes of disclaimer saying how it's just off film.  That's the problem with rankings, they're easy to take out of context.  I'm sure his Herbert film breakdown talked a lot about potential and consistency but that's not taken into a single top 10 ranking.  But rankings are easy to criticize and debate.   

I'm a pretty big fan of QB school and All Things QB.  They both have some good content on Darnold also

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, shaka said:

Oh yea, absolutely agree.  He even gives like 10 minutes of disclaimer saying how it's just off film.  That's the problem with rankings, they're easy to take out of context.  I'm sure his Herbert film breakdown talked a lot about potential and consistency but that's not taken into a single top 10 ranking.  But rankings are easy to criticize and debate.   

I'm a pretty big fan of QB school and All Things QB.  They both have some good content on Darnold also

Yeah his content is outstanding. As he said in the video he only watches 4-5 games of film on any given prospect and he shares that footage with YouTube. I would consider his rankings more definitive if he reviewed all their tape but that’s not the goal of his channel. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This is a two-part quiz that takes 5 minutes to take--if you need modification, they are available. Once you submit the answers to the first 2 questions (3 total answers) you take the USA Today online NFL Draft Quiz.  Complete the template below in your response.  Later tonight (after 8 pm), I will share the answers to the first two questions--please do not share your results until after 8 PM.  Obviously, if you choose not to participate, just don't participate and leave the replies for those who want to do this. (Honor system--Googling is CHEATING) 1.  Franchises with the most #1 picks in NFL History (2 are correct), so this counts as 2 points, 1 for each correct answer:  a) Bucs b) Jets c) Colts d) Rams e) Oilers/Titans 2.  How many #1 overall picks for the teams above were the most in NFL history? a) 3 b) 5 c) 6 d) 7 e) 9 OK for the next 10 questions, go to the link and take the 10 question online quiz.  Report your answers for the 2 questions above and the number correct from your online quiz. https://draftwire.usatoday.com/2021/11/01/nfl-draft-history-trivia-quiz/ SCALE:  12-13 correct:   Draft Royalty - you probably cheated though. 10-11  correct:  Stud.  Your brain is full of useless information. 8-9  correct:  Mr. or Mrs. Mediocre, which has probably been your goal for some time. 6-7  correct:  Snorkeler:  You can't quite reach the surface of the NFL knowledge pool, but you are close. 4-5  correct:  Life Support Recipient.  The people around you are Huddlers voting when to pull the plug.  0-3 correct:  Blue Tent Dweller.  You scored below random chance, meaning a toddler or monkey could have done better.  Stay in the blue tent.  The team is doing well without your input.   There is a non-monetary reward and consequence for being the top and low score.  All in fun.
    • Taking care of your eyes is one of the most important aspects of your health. You need them to navigate through walking, driving, and surfing the Internet. If you are searching for ways to keep your eyes protected, you are in luck. This article has several suggestions to help you out. Don't smoke. You probably already know that there are many serious dangers related to cigarette smoking. One of the less-known dangers is developing Age-related Macular Degeneration(AMD). Several scientific studies have shown that the patients who did smoke were much more likely to develop AMD than those who didn't smoke. Just another reason not to start smoking or to quit today. Avoid touching your eyes with your hand during the day if you had not washed your hands. When you are on the job or in school, your hands are in contact with surfaces that are full of bacteria. If you touch your eyes, you will transfer the bacteria to your eyes and raise the risk if an eye infection.     Click Here:   https://sourdough.com/posts/non-alcoholic-fatty-liver-disease-solution-reviews-julissa-clays-liver-support-program-worth   https://sourdough.com/posts/neuropathy-no-more-jodi-knapp-reviews-blue-heron-health-news-nerve-pain-relief-guide-book   https://sourdough.com/posts/neuropure-reviews-does-nerve-pain-supplement-work-or-any-side-effects-uk-canada-and-australia   https://sourdough.com/posts/joint-restore-gummies-update-april-2024-it-safe-ingredients-side-effects-customer-reviews   https://sourdough.com/posts/xitox-reviews-customer-alert-april-2024-deep-cleansing-foot-pads-worth-buying   https://sourdough.com/posts/septifix-tablets-reviews-customer-warning-septic-tank-treatment-tablets-worth-buying   https://sourdough.com/posts/eye-fortin-reviews-shocking-report-does-it-improve-vision-and-it-safe-usa-uk-canada-and   https://sourdough.com/posts/bone-density-solution-reviews-blue-heron-health-news-shelly-manning%E2%80%99s-program-book-legit-worth   https://sourdough.com/posts/okinawa-flat-belly-tonic-real-user-feedback-exposed-ingredients-april-2024   https://sourdough.com/posts/auto-lotto-processor-reviews-updated-2024-it-legit-software-real-customer%E2%80%99s-report-exposed   https://sourdough.com/posts/lottery-increaser-reviews-customer-warning-april-2024-winning-lottery-system-legit-pdf   https://sourdough.com/posts/lottery-maximizer-reviews-real-user-responses-my-honest-experience-price-discount   https://sourdough.com/posts/lottery-defeater-software-reviews-consumer-reports-everything-you-need-know-buying   https://sourdough.com/posts/lotto-profits-software-reviews-customer-alert-legit-lottery-prediction-system-2024-must-read   https://sourdough.com/posts/gut-go-reviews-new-consumer-complaints-dont-buy-gut-health-formula-until-you-read   https://sourdough.com/posts/claritox-pro-reviews-updated-2024-does-it-provide-relief-vertigo-and-dizziness-ingredients   https://sourdough.com/posts/septifix-tablets-reviews-updated-2024-does-septifix-septic-tank-treatment-tablets-work-where  
    • Martin is not skating, replaced by Iskhakov. Fasching back in Holmstrom out. 
×
×
  • Create New...