Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

PFF says the Panthers have the 20th(!! LOL) ranked WR corp in the NFL this year


joemac
 Share

Recommended Posts

14 minutes ago, glenwo2 said:

PFF voted 20th because of Sam and they think he sucks and will always suck.

That's it.

They're  a lot like the trolls here who bitched about Justin Fields not being drafted.  

We didn't have many receiving touchdowns last year and we lack a tight end. We were also very poor in the red zone. 

Those have to factor in. 

Hopefully this year is better in those areas. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't necessarily disagree with us being in the lower half of the league without Samuels.

Moore is excellent, but I don't really think that much of Robby. Everyone else is a wildcard at this point no matter how excited we are about them as fans. Marshall has to be the answer to our dismal redzone receiving issues, because what we had last year wasn't it, QB or not. We were probably better off fielding a 6th OL than a TE most downs as well.

I don't know that we're 20th out of 32, but it certainly isn't that surprising.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Call Me James said:

We didn't have many receiving touchdowns last year and we lack a tight end. We were also very poor in the red zone. 

Those have to factor in. 

Hopefully this year is better in those areas. 

It's amazing how a QB can impact a wr in both a positive (yards) and negative (TDs) way as Teddy managed to do.  You would have to practice that to be able to pull it off.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, Basbear said:

Where would you rank the duo of Moore and ANderson?

Well, that ranking isn’t a list of duos.  It is ranking of receiving units.  Which factors in your #3, TE, etc.   

If it were a duo WR ranking we would climb up.   I’d have to think about that list overall though.  Present day I think we would be 3rd in our own division to the outside world though.  Which is what we are on that list too.    So we still aren’t going to be super high.  Top half though of the league.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, CRA said:

Well, that ranking isn’t a list of duos.  It is ranking of receiving units.  Which factors in your #3, TE, etc.   

If it were a duo WR ranking we would climb up.   I’d have to think about that list overall though.  Present day I think we would be 3rd in our own division to the outside world though.  Which is what we are on that list too.    So we still aren’t going to be super high.  Top half though of the league.

Top 16 duo? I know its not the pfffft statement, Im just trying to gauge your feeling on Moore and ANderson. NFC is WR murders row.....which is a big reason for me being "ok" with horn pick. 

Still I think Moore and Anderson alone should push that rating higher. I believe Moore is the only WR with 1200 scrimmage yards in the last two years. TDs are very low for both. ANderson is a 1k and long yard machine. For the first 5 weeks ANderson was either leading the league or very close in most stats. 

Where do you rank Moore overall?, please give a firm number.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Basbear said:

Top 16 duo? I know its not the pfffft statement, Im just trying to gauge your feeling on Moore and ANderson. NFC is WR murders row.....which is a big reason for me being "ok" with horn pick. 

Still I think Moore and Anderson alone should push that rating higher. I believe Moore is the only WR with 1200 scrimmage yards in the last two years. TDs are very low for both. ANderson is a 1k and long yard machine. For the first 5 weeks ANderson was either leading the league or very close in most stats. 

Where do you rank Moore overall?, please give a firm number.

As I said, I’d have the duo top half.   But there are a lot of solid duos that have better overall stats which factors when it comes to doing a ranking. 

I’m super high on Moore.   I think he is a lot better than his stats suggest.  QB play has prevented his ceiling from showing because he hasn’t had the QB play since drafted to take advantage of him. 

if he has the opportunity, I think he can have 89 level impact.   I don’t think we put him in enough positions to show off his YAC ability.  My personal opinion is that it is the best in the division. 

Stats aside, I think there is a pretty decent gap between DJ and Robbie overall though. 

I can’t give a firm number on Moore.   If there was a fantasy draft and I was building a team today? There aren’t 10 I’d take over Moore.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

im not as high on our WR as everybody else in here

DJ can be really good but disappears a lot...Anderson is like a Ted Ginn with hands...but not a 12 catch a game type...and we have had NO TE or RB production for a whule

hopefully the rookie can give us something...& Arnold at TE needs to be big time

having CMC back will help tremendously...with him we are definitely better

the rest still needs to prove it

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Any QB worth his weight in gold is going to get his guys the ball. Of course he has to have the protection, coaching and experience to do that. Moreover, it has yet to be determined what type of situation this is for a rookie wideout. The most important thing that will determine that is coaching.
    • I watched it this afternoon and I thought some of the best discussions was before it even got to the players. One thing that really jumped out to me was when Smitty was asked about how things have changed since he played and the thing he talked about was how when he played and going back to Jerry Rice says, the #1 targeted or looked to receiver was always the X and there's still a lot of people who's minds are still stuck in that idea. But what has happened is that the, what he calls, the F receiver...the flanker...is now the go to guy. You need the X to try and get safeties out of the box, but the QB is now looking for his flanker most of the time. Lots of good discussions all through it, but for some reason the ones involving Ladd, Corley, and Leggette was the most interesting. Ladd was how he may be best fit for just the slot, but he's the best slot guy in the draft and he's just a guy who gets open and doesn't drop the ball. Corley and Leggette are playmakers who are at a risk of being pigeonholed. Leggette is too stiff to be a slot guy but he can do things like Metcalf. Corley is likely to be used much as he was in college, as the big playmaker you just get the ball in his hands however you can, but he's got a lot of room for development as a receiver. It's just good football talk all the way through  
    • I'd resigned myself to 2000 and never.   Cautiously optimistic based on this off season that 2026 is a real possibility. 
×
×
  • Create New...