Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Loki


CRA
 Share

Recommended Posts

12 hours ago, Panthercougar68 said:

Here comes Kang!

(alligator Loki ftw)

I have my doubts that a TV show will be his debut in the MCU.   Nothing to date from the other shows says the TV shows are going that far.  We will have to see I guess. 

Loved the Throg easter egg too lol.  But yeah, alligator Loki is pretty awesome. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

SPOILERS

I personally have my eye on old man kermit the frog looking Loki.....still factoring next episode. 

We didn't get the big payoff in WandaVision.  I'm thinking they maintain that here too.  We get the Kang debut later in an actual movie. 

I'm thinking Loki largely just lays out how the the Spider-Man variants will work and are understood and aspects of the multiverse.   Plus, it sets up how Loki stays involved with the timeline our MCU based on. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, CRA said:

SPOILERS

I personally have my eye on old man kermit the frog looking Loki.....still factoring next episode. 

We didn't get the big payoff in WandaVision.  I'm thinking they maintain that here too.  We get the Kang debut later in an actual movie. 

I'm thinking Loki largely just lays out how the the Spider-Man variants will work and are understood and aspects of the multiverse.   Plus, it sets up how Loki stays involved with the timeline our MCU based on. 

Ya, unless they tease him Kang isn’t suppose to show up until the next ant-man and wasp. So I have a hard to believing he’s the ultimate villain here. My moneys still on a Loki variant. 
 

Kinda disappointed with last nights episode beside all the Loki’s. Really just 99% annoying filler that really didn’t accomplish anything and the little bit of character building they tried to do fell flat to me. This is why I tend to not watch shows until the whole season is out. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Harbingers said:

Ya, unless they tease him Kang isn’t suppose to show up until the next ant-man and wasp. So I have a hard to believing he’s the ultimate villain here. My moneys still on a Loki variant. 
 

Kinda disappointed with last nights episode beside all the Loki’s. Really just 99% annoying filler that really didn’t accomplish anything and the little bit of character building they tried to do fell flat to me. This is why I tend to not watch shows until the whole season is out. 

the old man Loki just stood out to me.  The whole line about his illusion being so great and grand that it fooled Thanos into thinking he killed him.  At first, I was like......is that what happened with our Loki.  Was that what they were going for? To have us think about that.   

But then later on he had a line about not wanting to leave despite the option.  And then pulled off another super grand illusion where we are to believe he died. 

So I think Kang could be loosely alluded to.   But I think old man Loki will be the guy in the castle/house.   

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Having it be Kang would suck, as the whole season whould be a pointless waste just to set him up as the baddie for a movie. Having it not be Kang also sucks, as this short AF season would be over with next to no build up or deep character dive for the man behind the curtain. Oh, it's Old Man Loki? Cool ... he was great ... in his one episode. Neat, he's behind it. Now they are going to beat him. Series over!

Meh.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think Lady Loki is Enchantress and she has in fact enchanted Loki into falling in love with her. What better way to get a narcissist like Loki to finally fall in love with someone than to offer up a female version of himself? I think the motivations they've given her in this series are what ultimately drive her to choose revenge/chaos over love with Loki. Remember how she only had a short pause when he was 'pruned' last episode and was composed enough not to kill Ravonna, instead sparing her for interrogation? You don't react that way if the one person you love most in the universe has just been murdered. I think they finally destroy/overtake whoever(not Kang) is in the castle, and she's successful in creating the multiverse, which will set up the Dr. Strange and Spiderman movies coming out in the next 12 months. 

When I was a kid, I always thought it would be great for my favorite comic book characters to be in good movies and have lots of great crossovers like they do in the actual comic books, but this Disney brand corporate synergy is fuging exhausting. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Panther'sBigD said:

I think Lady Loki is Enchantress and she has in fact enchanted Loki into falling in love with her. What better way to get a narcissist like Loki to finally fall in love with someone than to offer up a female version of himself? I think the motivations they've given her in this series are what ultimately drive her to choose revenge/chaos over love with Loki. Remember how she only had a short pause when he was 'pruned' last episode and was composed enough not to kill Ravonna, instead sparing her for interrogation? You don't react that way if the one person you love most in the universe has just been murdered. I think they finally destroy/overtake whoever(not Kang) is in the castle, and she's successful in creating the multiverse, which will set up the Dr. Strange and Spiderman movies coming out in the next 12 months. 

When I was a kid, I always thought it would be great for my favorite comic book characters to be in good movies and have lots of great crossovers like they do in the actual comic books, but this Disney brand corporate synergy is fuging exhausting. 

SPOILERS/MY BAD GUESS

I think Lady Loki is the MCU's unique version of Enchantress.  I am not buying the romance though. 

and I think she will betray our Loki once they get to the castle and reach some sort final decision moment after they meet old man/classic Loki at the end.  Our Loki has been enchanted ever since that scene he claimed it wouldn't work...and then started to "fall" for her.  She needed help to get to the end.   And they make sure you are pondering the betrayal angle potentially coming from Loki....instead of Sylvie as we enter the finale episode.  

Our Loki in the end loses.   That's what Loki's do.  A steady theme they have repeated.  He gets betrayed.   He takes an L.  But the other theme is Loki's survive.  So he will find a different way out of there than the route Sylvie takes.   His route out will keep him in play with our MCU. 

I think the TV shows largely are just bonus material and fleshing out characters that don't get it in the movies.   They will give us additional insight and some bonus knowledge when the movies hit the multiverse/variants and other plots.....but Marvel isn't going to want the TV shows to be required info for the actual story.  I do think who they meet at the end will hint at a lot of what is coming....but we don't get the real payoff. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, CRA said:

SPOILERS/MY BAD GUESS

I think Lady Loki is the MCU's unique version of Enchantress.  I am not buying the romance though. 

and I think she will betray our Loki once they get to the castle and reach some sort final decision moment after they meet old man/classic Loki at the end.  Our Loki has been enchanted ever since that scene he claimed it wouldn't work...and then started to "fall" for her.  She needed help to get to the end.   And they make sure you are pondering the betrayal angle potentially coming from Loki....instead of Sylvie as we enter the finale episode.  

Our Loki in the end loses.   That's what Loki's do.  A steady theme they have repeated.  He gets betrayed.   He takes an L.  But the other theme is Loki's survive.  So he will find a different way out of there than the route Sylvie takes.   His route out will keep him in play with our MCU. 

I think the TV shows largely are just bonus material and fleshing out characters that don't get it in the movies.   They will give us additional insight and some bonus knowledge when the movies hit the multiverse/variants and other plots.....but Marvel isn't going to want the TV shows to be required info for the actual story.  I do think who they meet at the end will hint at a lot of what is coming....but we don't get the real payoff. 

 

Don’t forget too Loki is suppose to have a second season according to the rumor mill and hints MCU execs have dropped. Honestly, it’d be dumb not to do a second season with the viewership it’s pulling in. We know Loki is suppose to be in doctor strange. I wouldn’t be surprised though if a second series of the show doesn’t follow Sylvia more though. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Sanders isn't going anywhere.  He's already part of the mix. 
    • I haven't seen the whole thing but what I saw I really liked. Yeah....seems like a whole lot of "well....duh" basic poo, but that's what we've been missing here. Everything they did has been hodge podge for years. There has been no real vision and no real collaboration. There's always just been one guy making the call on everything. It was Hurney, then Rhule, then Fitt. Canales comes in "as a newb" eager to learn, but in the process he gets everyone on the same page. Starts with the basics and with that created a floor, a foundation, to build on. Should they need to start over? No. Should they start over! Yes. It's pathetic that we have to start all over. But that's where we are. Get over it and get past it. We were built haphazardly. The closest abd most recent thing we've had to an actual decent plan was when we drafted Cam and out in what ever extra pieces we needed...namely two big vet TEs. We had the remnant of a decent OL and stud RBs and a legendary WR already here. There was very little we needed to succeed right out of the gate, but they knew a rookie QB was going to need a slid run game and big-time reliable passing targets including those stud RBs. When after that initial year, things started falling to crap slowl and then Gettleman came and really started fugging things up like some kind of fat al pacino wannabe gangster. Ever since then we've just thrown poo at the wall and hoped it worked. We tried to be clever without any clear vision of what we wanted the team to be. I think Rhule thought he did, but he was built for coaching motivating kids who don't know that he doesn't really know poo about football. Point is, we've been walking around aimless for over a decade. We now have it abd for that im especially grateful. Are they saying all the right things? I sure hope the hell they are because it sounds like they really know way they are doing. One thing that I really appreciated was Canales giving the scouts unsolicited praise and talked about how they were brought into the meetings with the coaching staff who, coach by coach, position by position, said what they were looking for and then took the scouting work they had already done and continued it to prepare for this draft. It sounds like an actual collaboration where the scouts know what the coaches are looking for and work to pair up players with the team, trying to find, what they called, the right panther fit. Again, sounds pretty elementary abd basic, but also again, this is something we haven't had. I remember going back to hurney's time I remember hearing sentiments from scouts who would do a ton of research on players leading up to the draft and when the draft was going on they would try to give their input based on months and sometimes years of watching these guys, going to their games, watching tape, meeting with players, teammates, position coaches, teachers, even family to try and get good insight on all the prospects, only to be treated like they weren't even in the room. They'd get excited about a pick coming up and who they thought would be a good fit and Hurney would just go another direction and then they would be questioning why they even bothered. Hurney did what Hurney was going to do without any input from anyone else. Rhule did the same thing. And then Fitt did the same damn thing after that power was taken away from Rhule. Sorry for all the words, but I really do feel like we're heading in the right direction.
    • Canucks lead Jets 1-0 in the first, game is on ESPN+. Jets just tied it 1-1 nice.
×
×
  • Create New...