Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Aaron Rodgers to retire?


Ja  Rhule
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Fox007 said:

Yea everytime I come back here I'm reminded of just how much of a backwater for football discussion this place is lol. He then goes on to mention poo that the best organizations do...you know like...having only 2 QBs in the last 30 years. Only find that on the best teams.

Doing the same thing with Rodgers they did with Favre and now these yokels who only watch First Take just run with whatever they are told on there about how the Packers are "mismanaging" lol. Hell if anything the NFL will be more than willing to triple down to make sure the league doesn't end up like the NBA, much less a 1 ring having Diva of a QB from GB gonna be runnin poo. But honestly Rodgers hates the media and loves trolling them, so who knows.

It's more for anything non Panthers related it seems... we're out here trying to say a division where the #2 team has more winning seasons than anyone in our division since our inception (which is already a generous sample, because the teams in our division's history pre-1995 is awful) is weaker than the NFC East sans NE lol

Edited by beo
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Is English a second language for you? You sure do struggle with it.

 

Oh look, it's the grammar police. You lose on merits. So your recourse is this? lol

 

Face it dude. Your insults are as lame as your arguments. Maybe there are some 5th graders around you can practice on. Then come back and try again. It's okay, I'll wait.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Isn't this a yearly cycle?

1) Rodgers threatens to quit and has a dramatic dispute that ends just in time for training camp.

2) Packers look pretty bad first two games

3) Packers look unstoppable and are SuperBowl favorites

4) Packers lose the NFC Championship.

Rinse and repeat......

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, iamhubby1 said:

 

Oh look, it's the grammar police. You lose on merits. So your recourse is this? lol

 

Face it dude. Your insults are as lame as your arguments. Maybe there are some 5th graders around you can practice on. Then come back and try again. It's okay, I'll wait.

It's just that you don't see to have a good grasp of the English language. You clearly misinterpreted my last post that was very easy to read. English is either a second language or... well, I hope English is a second language.

  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, iamhubby1 said:

That's what happens when you have Stockholders. Profits over glory.

Packers "stockholders" are that in name only...they do not, nor have they ever shared in any "profits".

In fact, the franchise operates under a not-for-profit corporate structure and is the only NFL for which annual financial statements/information is available to the general public...

...some starter reading here if you're interested: 

https://shareholder.broadridge.com/pdf/gbp/green-bay-packers-2020-annual-report.pdf

 

Edited by SizzleBuzz
  • Pie 1
  • Beer 3
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Any QB worth his weight in gold is going to get his guys the ball. Of course he has to have the protection, coaching and experience to do that. Moreover, it has yet to be determined what type of situation this is for a rookie wideout. The most important thing that will determine that is coaching.
    • I watched it this afternoon and I thought some of the best discussions was before it even got to the players. One thing that really jumped out to me was when Smitty was asked about how things have changed since he played and the thing he talked about was how when he played and going back to Jerry Rice says, the #1 targeted or looked to receiver was always the X and there's still a lot of people who's minds are still stuck in that idea. But what has happened is that the, what he calls, the F receiver...the flanker...is now the go to guy. You need the X to try and get safeties out of the box, but the QB is now looking for his flanker most of the time. Lots of good discussions all through it, but for some reason the ones involving Ladd, Corley, and Leggette was the most interesting. Ladd was how he may be best fit for just the slot, but he's the best slot guy in the draft and he's just a guy who gets open and doesn't drop the ball. Corley and Leggette are playmakers who are at a risk of being pigeonholed. Leggette is too stiff to be a slot guy but he can do things like Metcalf. Corley is likely to be used much as he was in college, as the big playmaker you just get the ball in his hands however you can, but he's got a lot of room for development as a receiver. It's just good football talk all the way through  
    • I'd resigned myself to 2000 and never.   Cautiously optimistic based on this off season that 2026 is a real possibility. 
×
×
  • Create New...