Texans now indicate Deshaun Watson is available for trade

[onmyown]

10 hours ago, joemac said:

We are ABSOLUTELY a QB at the level of Deshaun Watson away from challenging for the division right now. 

Good lord the homerism is embarrassing.

Statistics, history, and logic say otherwise - based on the division last year.

You’re simply hoping a ton of areas improve. Hope is not absolute. And it doesn’t trump observation or history (last year).

For instance a DeShaun Watson on last years team would not have won the division. The rankings just aren’t there. Statistically speaking, success with such poor team rankings such as last year, has been done like before literally a few times in all of NFL history what in the holy hell are people thinking when they post stuff like that…give me numbers and logic that is based on, no feelings or ‘potential’ please.

 

[ForJimmy]

1 hour ago, LinvilleGorge said:

This "strong man" obsession he has is just bizarre.

Definitely loves the “owners” over the players. Even spent time arguing the NBA owners over the players as far of a stretch that is…

[Toomers]

46 minutes ago, Basbear said:

110% sizzle is not chuck. hes 10x smarter than old chuckster 

______________________________________________________________________________________

 

    

   Despite all evidence to the contrary. And in his usual move, treat this proof like it doesn’t exist. Who else is it that admitted to being banned multiple times, and says exactly what he has preached for a year? That people fell, and are still falling for this is just sad. 

[Basbear]

10 minutes ago, Toomers said:

   Despite all evidence to the contrary. And in his usual move, treat this proof like it doesn’t exist. Who else is it that admitted to being banned multiple times, and says exactly what he has preached for a year? That people fell, and are still falling for this is just sad. 

Sizzle admitted to being chuck or being banned multiple times? Sanjay was a 2 TE memelord that got banned and that maybe sizzle, but I seriously doubt chuck is up to sizzle's posting habits along with his 10 other poo cans alts....

[Toomers]

5 minutes ago, Basbear said:

Sizzle admitted to being chuck or being banned multiple times? Sanjay was a 2 TE memelord that got banned and that maybe sizzle, but I seriously doubt chuck is up to sizzle's posting habits along with his 10 other poo cans alts....

   The first post is from here, months before SB signed up. With word for word identical thoughts about the team being run like a TV show. 
 

  The second is from Pats board where he wants Cam to “subjugate” himself to Belichik. Much like all players should do what the owners tell them. With the username RASTAN99 much like his RASTAN66 on here. When I challenged his comments I got this. Not sure what else you need as proof? 

 

 

On the Game Day Roster

Aug 4, 2020

You do realize they have banned me repeatedly? That's why I can't post anymore.

Do you remember the guy who presented the detailed expected value calculations that supported bringing back Cam? 

Yeah that was me.

Remember the guy who kept harping on "optionality" and maintained that Tepper would for sure bring Cam back because from an "optionality" perspective it was the only logical move to make?

Yeah that was me to.

Do you remember Kyle Bailey talking on WFNZ about the concept of "optionality" for months and using it to support his position that the Panthers could & should bring Cam back?

Yeah he got that from me.

By the time I squeezed back onto the Huddle with the name similar to this one the deal for Teddy had already been made to the narrative changed. Huddle disappeared all the expected-value and optionality content, not sure why the RASTAN66 stuff was allowed to stay up.

[cookinbrak]

1 hour ago, onmyown said:

Good lord the homerism is embarrassing.

Statistics, history, and logic say otherwise - based on the division last year.

You’re simply hoping a ton of areas improve. Hope is not absolute. And it doesn’t trump observation or history (last year).

For instance a DeShaun Watson on last years team would not have won the division. The rankings just aren’t there. Statistically speaking, success with such poor team rankings such as last year, has been done like before literally a few times in all of NFL history what in the holy hell are people thinking when they post stuff like that…give me numbers and logic that is based on, no feelings or ‘potential’ please.

 

Also, the miscreants fail to comprehend that if you give up draft picks, you can't get players you need for 2-3 years.

A better possibility would have been to buy Tom Brady.

[Verge]

Makes sense. Three team race.

[Peanut Butter]

How do y'all trash Jerry Richardson then want this guy lol

[iamhubby1]

2 hours ago, onmyown said:

Good lord the homerism is embarrassing.

Statistics, history, and logic say otherwise - based on the division last year.

You’re simply hoping a ton of areas improve. Hope is not absolute. And it doesn’t trump observation or history (last year).

For instance a DeShaun Watson on last years team would not have won the division. The rankings just aren’t there. Statistically speaking, success with such poor team rankings such as last year, has been done like before literally a few times in all of NFL history what in the holy hell are people thinking when they post stuff like that…give me numbers and logic that is based on, no feelings or ‘potential’ please.

 

 

Would you be willing to post a list on how we should fan properly? I mean, c'mon man. Let the kids have some damm fun. 

[iamhubby1]

14 minutes ago, Peanut Butter said:

How do y'all trash Jerry Richardson then want this guy lol

 

Is that y'all singular, or plural? Because not everybody wants Watson.

[Verge]

19 minutes ago, Peanut Butter said:

How do y'all trash Jerry Richardson then want this guy lol

I would personally take a break from this franchise for the duration of his tenure on the roster if we ended up trading for him. 

[iamhubby1]

10 minutes ago, Verge said:

I would personally take a break from this franchise for the duration of his tenure on the roster if we ended up trading for him. 

 

You, me and most of the fanbase. 

[SizzleBuzz]

4 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

The NFL has non-guaranteed contracts. They HEAVILY favor the team. You just love watching people having to bend the knee to authority figures.

Complete horse-hockey and more virtue signaling please!   LOL. 

Contracts are a 2-way street and agreed to by both parties...

...if either side feels it's unfair they should decline to sign.  

Own it.  

Edited July 27, 2021 by SizzleBuzz

[LinvilleGorge]

4 minutes ago, SizzleBuzz said:

Complete horse-hockey and more virtue signaling please!   LOL. 

Contracts are a 2-way street and agreed to by both parties...

...if either side feels it's unfair they should decline to sign.  

Own it.  

But if a team decides to terminate the contract you have no issue with that. If the player attempts to utilize his leverage (because he CAN'T terminate the contract) you howl like crazy. Bizarre.