Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Texans now indicate Deshaun Watson is available for trade


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

32 minutes ago, SizzleBuzz said:

You're entitled to an opinion, it's a free country.

The "power/authority" is determined by the details of the contract both parties agree to.  It is true that I don't like it when whiny bitches who are on track to make $200,000,000+ in a career start pouting over hurt feelings and want to be let out of their contract as such.

 

A player can only be cut if the contract is the terms of the contract allow the team to do so.  Sometimes there are ramifications in terms of payments owed the player, sometimes not.

If a player believes a contract to be unfair, they shouldn't sign it.  If they sign it, they need to be prepared fulfill it.

If a team conducts themselves outside the boundaries set in the contract, the team should be held accountable...and you can rest assurred the NFLPA makes they are.

It's a free country, players can whine, holdout, quit...no worries here, whatever they want...

...but hurt feeling don't obligate the team to change the terms of the contract.  

That's where we differ, you don't believe in contracts, I do.

It's ok to have differing views...

...understanding right & wrong and believing in the rule of law is important to me...others, not so much.  

The NFL has non-guaranteed contracts. They HEAVILY favor the team. You just love watching people having to bend the knee to authority figures.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Toomers said:

     Chuck has been yanking y’all around with this BS through multiple ALTs. The post below was one of the first and 4 months before Sizzle signed up. He was all over the Pats forum saying Cam needed to “subjugate” himself to Belichik. So that fits the pattern shown here. Plenty more proof if he wants to deny it. 

   On 4/7/2020 at 1:03 PM,  TheSpecialJuan said: 

This is a good thing 

And true.

It amazes me how many folks think Hurney is running the show -- couldn't be further from the truth. 

Hurndog doesn't have the authority to pull the trigger on ANYTHING without the approval of Tepper and/or Rhule.

For those of you who may watch Billions...Tepper is Axe...Rhule is Dollar Bill (a portfolio manager with limited trading authority)...Hurndog is a supporting analyst with no trading authority (unless it is co-brokered with Rhule and doesn't exceed Rhule's size limits).

110% sizzle is not chuck. hes 10x smarter than old chuckster 

______________________________________________________________________________________

 

For Watson- I didnt want him at the 3 1sts, 2s, players and mid-late haul asking price.  Then 40+ women came with stories, weird sick stories........ Goodell needs to hand down the punishment first, its still very hard to over-look the tiny cloth with flying fluids stories form multiple massage therapists across the states lines. Most of the Houston massage people put him on their "list". 

Edited by Basbear
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, joemac said:

We are ABSOLUTELY a QB at the level of Deshaun Watson away from challenging for the division right now. 

Good lord the homerism is embarrassing.

Statistics, history, and logic say otherwise - based on the division last year.

You’re simply hoping a ton of areas improve. Hope is not absolute. And it doesn’t trump observation or history (last year).

For instance a DeShaun Watson on last years team would not have won the division. The rankings just aren’t there. Statistically speaking, success with such poor team rankings such as last year, has been done like before literally a few times in all of NFL history what in the holy hell are people thinking when they post stuff like that…give me numbers and logic that is based on, no feelings or ‘potential’ please.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, LinvilleGorge said:

This "strong man" obsession he has is just bizarre.

Definitely loves the “owners” over the players. Even spent time arguing the NBA owners over the players as far of a stretch that is…

Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, Basbear said:

110% sizzle is not chuck. hes 10x smarter than old chuckster 

______________________________________________________________________________________

 

    

   Despite all evidence to the contrary. And in his usual move, treat this proof like it doesn’t exist. Who else is it that admitted to being banned multiple times, and says exactly what he has preached for a year? That people fell, and are still falling for this is just sad. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Toomers said:

   Despite all evidence to the contrary. And in his usual move, treat this proof like it doesn’t exist. Who else is it that admitted to being banned multiple times, and says exactly what he has preached for a year? That people fell, and are still falling for this is just sad. 

Sizzle admitted to being chuck or being banned multiple times? Sanjay was a 2 TE memelord that got banned and that maybe sizzle, but I seriously doubt chuck is up to sizzle's posting habits along with his 10 other poo cans alts....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Basbear said:

Sizzle admitted to being chuck or being banned multiple times? Sanjay was a 2 TE memelord that got banned and that maybe sizzle, but I seriously doubt chuck is up to sizzle's posting habits along with his 10 other poo cans alts....

   The first post is from here, months before SB signed up. With word for word identical thoughts about the team being run like a TV show. 
 

  The second is from Pats board where he wants Cam to “subjugate” himself to Belichik. Much like all players should do what the owners tell them. With the username RASTAN99 much like his RASTAN66 on here. When I challenged his comments I got this. Not sure what else you need as proof? 

 

 

On the Game Day Roster
Aug 4, 2020
You do realize they have banned me repeatedly? That's why I can't post anymore.

Do you remember the guy who presented the detailed expected value calculations that supported bringing back Cam? 

Yeah that was me.

Remember the guy who kept harping on "optionality" and maintained that Tepper would for sure bring Cam back because from an "optionality" perspective it was the only logical move to make?

Yeah that was me to.

Do you remember Kyle Bailey talking on WFNZ about the concept of "optionality" for months and using it to support his position that the Panthers could & should bring Cam back?

Yeah he got that from me.

By the time I squeezed back onto the Huddle with the name similar to this one the deal for Teddy had already been made to the narrative changed. Huddle disappeared all the expected-value and optionality content, not sure why the RASTAN66 stuff was allowed to stay up.
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, onmyown said:

Good lord the homerism is embarrassing.

Statistics, history, and logic say otherwise - based on the division last year.

You’re simply hoping a ton of areas improve. Hope is not absolute. And it doesn’t trump observation or history (last year).

For instance a DeShaun Watson on last years team would not have won the division. The rankings just aren’t there. Statistically speaking, success with such poor team rankings such as last year, has been done like before literally a few times in all of NFL history what in the holy hell are people thinking when they post stuff like that…give me numbers and logic that is based on, no feelings or ‘potential’ please.

 

Also, the miscreants fail to comprehend that if you give up draft picks, you can't get players you need for 2-3 years.

A better possibility would have been to buy Tom Brady.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, onmyown said:

Good lord the homerism is embarrassing.

Statistics, history, and logic say otherwise - based on the division last year.

You’re simply hoping a ton of areas improve. Hope is not absolute. And it doesn’t trump observation or history (last year).

For instance a DeShaun Watson on last years team would not have won the division. The rankings just aren’t there. Statistically speaking, success with such poor team rankings such as last year, has been done like before literally a few times in all of NFL history what in the holy hell are people thinking when they post stuff like that…give me numbers and logic that is based on, no feelings or ‘potential’ please.

 

 

Would you be willing to post a list on how we should fan properly? I mean, c'mon man. Let the kids have some damm fun. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Peanut Butter said:

How do y'all trash Jerry Richardson then want this guy lol

I would personally take a break from this franchise for the duration of his tenure on the roster if we ended up trading for him. 

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


×
×
  • Create New...