Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

An early look at 2022 QB class...


methodtoll
 Share

Recommended Posts

18 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

We have to replace 4 out of 5.   And for all of the good examples you gave the bad is infinitely more.  

That’s the story for every FA and draft pick (especially 1st round OL, it’s become as risky as QBs). Most franchise QBs were drafted by their team. Several of the top lines have high tier FAs on them. You have to find your QB to compete. We probably won’t be able to replace all 4 linemen, but replacing 2 out of 4 with a top tier FA is a good way to start. Late draft picks can come in and compete with BC, Brown, and whoever else we gave on our roster. Just getting our line from bottom of the league to middle will do wonders.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, ForJimmy said:

There will be FA options, you just have to pay for them. I’d rather spend money on that than another $15 million Sam or $20 million Teddy journeyman QB. Go pick up Cam Robinson, Scherff, Armstead, Teller, or Connor Williams. Work in BC and Brown. Herbert and Burris (injury aside) played with terrible lines their first year. You have to have a QB period. Give Darnold a better line and he will just hold the ball longer and continue to make terrible decisions. Having to watch him again next year will be a tough sell for the fans.

Biggest thing right here. Fans already don't come to the games, you tell them darnolds coming back and its gonna be way worse. They gotta do something to spark interest crazy as it sounds but they dont really have much options in first round outside of OL and QB. They cant even think about going defense again in my opinion.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I haven't completely given up on Christensen and Brown yet. Few rookie OL are impact players.

We should be playing them though. I can't be convinced they'd be playing any worse than the vets we keep trotting out there and maybe they can improve with experience.

We don't have to worry about protecting darnold anymore. 

 

Play the guys. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
1 minute ago, ForJimmy said:

Honestly, I haven’t heard much about him. Is he projected to enter the draft?

I think he is a senior. Honestly, he has been quiet for the most part. He had like 11 TDs to 5INTS before these two big games against Syracuse (209 pass yds 4td 0 int) & Duke (303 pass yds 5 td 224 rush yds 2 rush td). 

He was ranked maybe 9th prior to the duke game. Maybe some big games boost him. But not likely high. Would be a project QB, But with time I like the kid as a day 3 pick. I think he could learn a lot behind a Cam Newton if we end up keeping him longer (i think we will)

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, CarolinaLivin said:

I think he is a senior. Honestly, he has been quiet for the most part. He had like 11 TDs to 5INTS before these two big games against Syracuse (209 pass yds 4td 0 int) & Duke (303 pass yds 5 td 224 rush yds 2 rush td). 

He was ranked maybe 9th prior to the duke game. Maybe some big games boost him. But not likely high. Would be a project QB, But with time I like the kid as a day 3 pick. I think he could learn a lot behind a Cam Newton if we end up keeping him longer (i think we will)

Yeah that kind of what I was thinking. A project QB with a lot of ability that can learn under Cam for a few years if Cam holds up this year. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

Yeah that kind of what I was thinking. A project QB with a lot of ability that can learn under Cam for a few years if Cam holds up this year. 

Prioritize OL, but if a QB we like drops into say 3rd or 4th round, maybe we take him. I wouldn't mind, but I also wouldn't mind waiting to throw a pick at that 2023 draft class.

Side Note: I have it set in my mind that we're trading back with our 1st pick in the draft. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
On 11/19/2021 at 11:50 AM, ForJimmy said:

Honestly, I haven’t heard much about him. Is he projected to enter the draft?

He isn't entering the draft:

 

https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/hes-back-louisville-quarterback-malik-163653428.html

For context he has been at Louisville since 2017 where he Red Shirt. In 2018 he barely played and threw 1 TD and 1 INT. In 2019 he was 22:5, 2020 he was 20:12, 2021 he is 18:6 throwing the ball in terms of TD to INT. He is coming back to college for his 6th year at Louisville. If drafted to the NFL next season he was be a 25 year old rookie QB. We have Sam and PJ as our QBs next year so far and I think both of them have no contract after that. As it stands now, he would be the only QB on our roster in 2023 so he would have to be the projected starter. 

If we signed another guy to let him develop under how long does that last? Three years in development puts him at 28 years old cracking the starting lineup for the first time. That's a long time to wait for a guy and would be the end of Rhules contract. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can't believe this thread is still going on considering we only have 1 pick on the first two days, in a weak QB class and an OL that smells of rotten garbage. 

Sure, let's keep talking about drafting a rookie QB!  I get the Howell homers getting the fuzzies about the thought of drafting him, but it's not going to happen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also, ZERO comp picks this draft as well.   The Panthers drafting a rookie QB this year is along the logic of a house burning down and the homeowner starts mowing the grass to keep up the curb appeal. The devastation is so blatantly obvious, but doing this one thing might put a little shine on that turd,

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, 45catfan said:

I can't believe this thread is still going on considering we only have 1 pick on the first two days, in a weak QB class and an OL that smells of rotten garbage. 

Sure, let's keep talking about drafting a rookie QB!  I get the Howell homers getting the fuzzies about the thought of drafting him, but it's not going to happen.

It's a draft forum... We are talking potential draft prospects... QB is a need... So yeah

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, 45catfan said:

I can't believe this thread is still going on considering we only have 1 pick on the first two days, in a weak QB class and an OL that smells of rotten garbage. 

Sure, let's keep talking about drafting a rookie QB!  I get the Howell homers getting the fuzzies about the thought of drafting him, but it's not going to happen.

Chargers had no line and drafted Herbert, Bengals did the same with Burrow, and the Cardinals did the same with Murray. You need a QB to compete in this league, once you have that you can build around them. Going into next year with Darnold plus a rookie OG and this line won’t change this franchise as much as a potential QB can. It should have been addressed as soon as we parted ways with Cam or the following year, but we can’t keep trying random stop gap vets and assuming we will be fine. I get that we need to fix the line, but we are missing the most important position in sports and have only one early pick to try to correct it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Sanders isn't going anywhere.  He's already part of the mix. 
    • I haven't seen the whole thing but what I saw I really liked. Yeah....seems like a whole lot of "well....duh" basic poo, but that's what we've been missing here. Everything they did has been hodge podge for years. There has been no real vision and no real collaboration. There's always just been one guy making the call on everything. It was Hurney, then Rhule, then Fitt. Canales comes in "as a newb" eager to learn, but in the process he gets everyone on the same page. Starts with the basics and with that created a floor, a foundation, to build on. Should they need to start over? No. Should they start over! Yes. It's pathetic that we have to start all over. But that's where we are. Get over it and get past it. We were built haphazardly. The closest abd most recent thing we've had to an actual decent plan was when we drafted Cam and out in what ever extra pieces we needed...namely two big vet TEs. We had the remnant of a decent OL and stud RBs and a legendary WR already here. There was very little we needed to succeed right out of the gate, but they knew a rookie QB was going to need a slid run game and big-time reliable passing targets including those stud RBs. When after that initial year, things started falling to crap slowl and then Gettleman came and really started fugging things up like some kind of fat al pacino wannabe gangster. Ever since then we've just thrown poo at the wall and hoped it worked. We tried to be clever without any clear vision of what we wanted the team to be. I think Rhule thought he did, but he was built for coaching motivating kids who don't know that he doesn't really know poo about football. Point is, we've been walking around aimless for over a decade. We now have it abd for that im especially grateful. Are they saying all the right things? I sure hope the hell they are because it sounds like they really know way they are doing. One thing that I really appreciated was Canales giving the scouts unsolicited praise and talked about how they were brought into the meetings with the coaching staff who, coach by coach, position by position, said what they were looking for and then took the scouting work they had already done and continued it to prepare for this draft. It sounds like an actual collaboration where the scouts know what the coaches are looking for and work to pair up players with the team, trying to find, what they called, the right panther fit. Again, sounds pretty elementary abd basic, but also again, this is something we haven't had. I remember going back to hurney's time I remember hearing sentiments from scouts who would do a ton of research on players leading up to the draft and when the draft was going on they would try to give their input based on months and sometimes years of watching these guys, going to their games, watching tape, meeting with players, teammates, position coaches, teachers, even family to try and get good insight on all the prospects, only to be treated like they weren't even in the room. They'd get excited about a pick coming up and who they thought would be a good fit and Hurney would just go another direction and then they would be questioning why they even bothered. Hurney did what Hurney was going to do without any input from anyone else. Rhule did the same thing. And then Fitt did the same damn thing after that power was taken away from Rhule. Sorry for all the words, but I really do feel like we're heading in the right direction.
    • Canucks lead Jets 1-0 in the first, game is on ESPN+. Jets just tied it 1-1 nice.
×
×
  • Create New...