Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Heinicke


NAS
 Share

Recommended Posts

29 minutes ago, TLGPanthersFan said:

You would think it would happen by now. I mean most back up QBs look good til there is tape on them and their flaws are exposed, like Kyle Allen. 
But Heinicke keeps playing well. Who knows maybe the Washington QB coach unlocked his potential. 

He’s played only 3 games from what I recall. Let’s pump the brakes a bit

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, NAS said:

He’s played only 3 games from what I recall. Let’s pump the brakes a bit

for your first 3 NFL starts (including a postseason game vs the SB champs).....he has shown a lot of promise.  

I don't think anyone is calling him the next Joe Montana.  But yeah, what he is doing is what you are suppose to get excited about.  Take a look around here, people get more excited about guys who have given us less to be pumped about it. 

would you rather have our current backup QB or Heinicke? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, kungfoodude said:

I could see a scenario where he is considered a top flight backup QB. One of those guys you can trust to keep the ship from taking on water if your starting QB goes down for a few games.

Seems like the Panthers have been a "hindsight" team for a few years now but it would have been nice to keep him around as a backup. 

Man its been quite awhile now that our good players go to other teams and "all the sudden" play well or are great backups...Hurney is literally the worst anything that ever anythinged in the NFL but our HCs keep starting or otherwise keeping worse players and it doesn't seem to matter who the HC is

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, CRA said:

for your first 3 NFL starts (including a postseason game vs the SB champs).....he has shown a lot of promise.  

I don't think anyone is calling him the next Joe Montana.  But yeah, what he is doing is what you are suppose to get excited about.  Take a look around here, people get more excited about guys who have given us less to be pumped about it. 

would you rather have our current backup QB or Heinicke? 

You mean the same people who have Training camp WRs in the HoF aren't up on someone who has actually done something! hold the got damn phone

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Jon Snow said:

I would rather have Darnold than either of the QBs on the field last night.

I would as well but as a backup I'd rather have Kyle Allen or Heinicke then either PJ or Grier(when he was here). Hindsight 20/20 and everything....I suppose Heinicke didn't show a ton when he was with us in limited action either. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • 4 AZ plan: -Stay at 4 and take MHJ. -Trade back to 6 with NYG or NE (* see ) and still take MHJ. 5 LAC plan: -Stay at 5 and take OT Alt (or I’m hearing maybe Latham over Alt?). -Move back to 11 and take OT Latham. 6 NYG plan: -Plan A: Want to move up to 3 for Maye. Don’t think NE will agree to move, but that’s what I hear NYG wants most. -Plan B: Odunze. I’m told they’re not gonna risk another OBJ/K. Toney situation. 7 TEN plan: -Take OT Alt if he’s still available (which could happen if LAC moved out of 5 and a QB was taken there. -Take OT Latham ***ATL at 8 and CHI at 9 could have multiple offers to trade back when they get on the clock, as teams behind them could be jockeying to move up for one of these guys: QB McCarthy, WR Nabers or Odunze, OT Alt or Latham, and TE Bowers. 8 ATL plan: -Take the top DEF player in the draft (EDGE Turner or DT Murphy) -Trade back a few spots and still take best available DEF player (EDGE Turner, DT Murphy or CB Arnold) 9 CHI plan: -Trade back and recover picks (only four picks this year). -DT Murphy II or best-available WR/EDGE/OT would be priorities after trade down. -Only caveat; CHI could stick at pick No. 9 if Odunze or Nabers falls. 10 NYJ plan: -Best available weapon for Aaron (Nabers, Odunze, Bowers) or LOT protector Aaron (insurance in ‘24 and long-term). -Can’t rule out a slight trade up (for a weapon) or a trade down (probably would wind up with OT at that point). 11 MIN plan: -Trade up for Maye -Trade up for JJ (but only if it doesn’t require breaking the bank with draft picks!) *I hear there’s a real cost-analysis going on in Minn… is it better to keep picks and land Penix at 11 or to pay a haul to move up for JJ. Very interesting debate! -Stay home at 11 and hope JJ falls. If not, take Penix. Finally, Saints, Rams, Steelers and Eagles are making a LOT of calls about moving up (NO = OT). And teams I’m hearing have interest in potentially moving up for TE Brock Bowers: -IND -JAX
    • My preference would be to move back 10 spots and pick up another 3rd.   Then I go 39. LB (wilson) 43. WR (leggett) 64. Edge (kneeland) 80. RB (benson) 101. TE (sinnott or wiley) 141. CB 142. C 240. WR (mcCringleberry)
    • https://www.sportskeeda.com/nfl/news-insider-notes-2024-nfl-draft-rams-eyeing-intriguing-trade-up-vikings-beginning-panic-qb-room     few nugs in there
×
×
  • Create New...