Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Robby worse contract than Batum?


slumdogmillionaire
 Share

Recommended Posts

Hear me out….Batum’s contract was one of the worst in Charlotte sports history.   Is Robby’s worse?   Not on the amount but the effects it will have….Marty/Jerry like hand out. 
 

1) Batums didn’t really hurt us from signing others bc Hornets not ready to contend….one or two of Reddick, Moore, Jackson, Burns probably won’t signed bc the money given to Robby.

2) timing….Batum had a good year and then you resigned him.  Why give Robby this contract before the year was over?  What was the rush….see how Marshall, Shi, and Robby does this year then decide and see what his value is.

3) Batum was impeding the process of younger players his last year here….Borrego put him on the bench and the young guys played.  You think Rhule will bench his Temple guy?    Marshall’s progress will be stunted.

4) Why draft Marshall in 2nd round if you’re going to keep Robby?  There were tons of talent left at that spot.

5) WRs are dime a dozen in every draft.  No reason to pay two WRs and a RB that much. Can’t build a contender paying them that much when you will have to pay your QB and the guys I mentioned above.

6) Age ….he’s not young.

7) Performance….I don’t think he ever was worth the money he got but this year has been really bad.   He won’t be able without touches and could become an expensive disgruntled diva. 
 

I just don’t get this contract extension….someone make me feel better about it and tell me what I’m missing.

  • Poo 20
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This offense uses 3 WR sets frequently... I don't see his contract as hurting any of our young players... Robby wasn't just a 1 year guy either.. he flashed on the Jets.

They do need to get him more involved, though. I think it'll happen with CMC down.  Part of me expects teams will need to start picking their poison with DJ or Robby.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is nothing wrong with Robbie. Darnold is missing open receivers left and right. And this is with protection. He is still a bit damaged from time in New York and we all see it. He is going to have to open up and make more winning throws, not just game managing throws as the season progresses. As he opens up, the touches and impact for Robbie will come. Plus, DJ is doing good things.  It has been three games and he signed a very manageable contract. The offense is still feeling its way out. Picking out one player after going 3-0 and hating on their contract is odd.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Ace420 said:

No, Robbie can play. Now that the offense is going through Sam instead of cmc, we need Robbie to run his deep routes and take the top off of defenses opening up the field for the other WRs and TEs.

Sam didn't find him much in Houston, but we will get him the ball. We have many wr options out there that are going to provide mismatch opprtunities for the other guys or for Robbie himself.

We just need to establish the run game again, and even though chubba had a few bad first games, he seemed to warm up and find a groove once he became the feature back.

Everything will be OK, no need to panic yet.

Why does everyone keep saying Robby is the deep threat? He’s not. He’s the check down corner route guy. It’s actually amazing we have had so much offensive production using our two best receivers ass backwards. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Any QB worth his weight in gold is going to get his guys the ball. Of course he has to have the protection, coaching and experience to do that. Moreover, it has yet to be determined what type of situation this is for a rookie wideout. The most important thing that will determine that is coaching.
    • I watched it this afternoon and I thought some of the best discussions was before it even got to the players. One thing that really jumped out to me was when Smitty was asked about how things have changed since he played and the thing he talked about was how when he played and going back to Jerry Rice says, the #1 targeted or looked to receiver was always the X and there's still a lot of people who's minds are still stuck in that idea. But what has happened is that the, what he calls, the F receiver...the flanker...is now the go to guy. You need the X to try and get safeties out of the box, but the QB is now looking for his flanker most of the time. Lots of good discussions all through it, but for some reason the ones involving Ladd, Corley, and Leggette was the most interesting. Ladd was how he may be best fit for just the slot, but he's the best slot guy in the draft and he's just a guy who gets open and doesn't drop the ball. Corley and Leggette are playmakers who are at a risk of being pigeonholed. Leggette is too stiff to be a slot guy but he can do things like Metcalf. Corley is likely to be used much as he was in college, as the big playmaker you just get the ball in his hands however you can, but he's got a lot of room for development as a receiver. It's just good football talk all the way through  
    • I'd resigned myself to 2000 and never.   Cautiously optimistic based on this off season that 2026 is a real possibility. 
×
×
  • Create New...