Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

  • panthers-redskins-1.jpg

Next year's 1st for Laremy Tunsil who says no?


RIPTreyLance
 Share

Recommended Posts

30 minutes ago, RIPTreyLance said:

Tell me why my idea is bad instead of just telling me it's a bad idea 

Because his contract sucks. Would rather draft a LT with our first or turn it into replacing our lost 2nd for Darnold

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, WarPanthers89 said:

Anyone who does not realize that Guard is our weakest position on the line, is not a full time fan. 

Guard or center. Paradise isn't a great blocker by any stretch and I don't think he does a great job of calling protections either honestly, at least not well enough to justify his liability as a blocker.

Edited by Floppin
Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, RIPTreyLance said:

Tell me why my idea is bad instead of just telling me it's a bad idea 

While Tunsil would be a huge upgrade our problem is more so up the middle at center and left guard. In addition we have tons of salary cap space but we have some of out top players (Burns & Moore ) due for extensions. If Darnold continues ar his current trajectory he will also need to be renewed. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, RIPTreyLance said:

Now that we've got this Texans game out of the way they should have no reason to want to withhold him from us if given the right offer.

He was tossing Brian burns around last night like he was a ragdoll. We are 31st in pass block rating in the NFL.  Perfect storm? 

If we're just going to draft a tackle next year anyway I don't see why not...

this is why I voted NO for the internet pipeline to Gastonia

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think a LT trade is more likely then people realize.

If we're at the trade deadline 1-2 games ahead of tampa with 1-2 losses, I feel we at least make an effort to fix the line.

Assuming darnold stays on track, he's worth 3 1sts on his own, we can afford to lose one, plus it would be a crap 1st anyway if we're playoff bound

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Chiefzack said:

I think a LT trade is more likely then people realize.

If we're at the trade deadline 1-2 games ahead of tampa with 1-2 losses, I feel we at least make an effort to fix the line.

Assuming darnold stays on track, he's worth 3 1sts on his own, we can afford to lose one, plus it would be a crap 1st anyway if we're playoff bound

Exactly. It's a calculated decision 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don’t think they will part with him. Their rebuild ain’t to far off considering that division IMO. And I don’t think we should. We draft really well. I would focus on o-line in the draft and get some lineman at a rookie rate. We got some contracts to dish out soon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


×
×
  • Create New...