-
Welcome!
Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!
Or simply create a new Huddle account.
Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!
.thumb.gif.f35aad759896324c3e174efcba5a66a6.gif)
-
-
-
-
Topics
-
-
-
-
Posts
-
I think it really depends on the players available. If there is a team willing to give up a warchest to grab let's say Penix of course you consider it. But if a stud WR is there at 33 that would be hard to turn down I like to what Gantt posted this week about how historically the compensation for 33 is basically an extra fourth. IMO that isn't worth it if a guy is there you know won't be at 39 -
I would 100% be ok with taking two WRs For example if we took AD at 33 and Ladd at 39 that would be incredible or if we take XL at 39 and Javon Baker at 65 or in the fourth I'd be happy as well
-
By CamWhoaaCam · Posted
I was told this was the deepest WR class in quite some time. We can't get a 2nd WR later in the draft? I might be the only person high on Johnson. I really feel he will be our #1 WR this season and I expect us to sign him longterm. He seems to get lost in all this WR talk. I'm all for double dipping at WR just not with our first 2 picks. We can get our 2nd WR later in the draft.
-
-
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.