Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Ranking the poo-ness of this game


Sam the Cat
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, tonka said:

Cool!  Thank you very much!  Kinda confusing!  LOL If I like I'll do flame, if I hate - poo I guess!  🤷‍♂️ 

SO check this out.

If you like something you'd normally like you just pie it.
If something is fire...
I'd warn against pooin just not liking something, it's a stronger version of a dislike and is honestly something most of the trolls/mouth breathers do the most. Or against obvious troll/poo posts

Edited by Fox007
Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, Sam the Cat said:

My Poo rank

5. Sam Darnold...Int and fumble but made it up with game TD/2pt game tying 97 yrd drive...almost Elway like.  

4. Defense.  580 yards and swiss cheese in late game/OT...wtf!

2B. OLINE...sorry they just suck...

2A. Wr....I saw ghosts of Roberto "stone hands" Duran out there

1. Joe Brady...Vilma and everyone else probably thought and screamed to go no huddle...he didn't  do that until the end.  His play calling was all poo, all day nobody got open all day and he got outclasses by the viking d coordinator.

Phil Snow should have a better scheme, but the defense is bound to get tired when the offense is off the field every drive in 2 minutes. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Fox007 said:

SO check this out.

If you like something you'd normally like you just pie it.
If something is fire...
I'd warn against pooin just not liking something, it's a stronger version of a dislike and is honestly something most of the trolls/mouth breathers do the most. Or against obvious troll/poo posts

Ok thx.  So poo is frowned upon unless absolutely putrid!  LOL Got it!  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, frankw said:

Everything and everyone else before the leader of the offense who turned the ball over from the word go and put up 7 points through 3 quarters? That's not how it works.

It's  a team game and the qbs main job is to advance the ball trhpugh the air....and he needs his wr to catch to do his job.   Well,  I will give you the two turn overs, that is way he is on the list.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Sam the Cat said:

It's  a team game and the qbs main job is to advance the ball trhpugh the air....and he needs his wr to catch to do his job.   Well,  I will give you the two turn overs, that is way he is on the list.

Right and since it's a team game we aren't even in it to tie to go to overtime without that 7 points from our special teams. Just how often do you see blocked punts for scores? The drops were inexcusable but the win was there for our offense just like last week and those two turnovers were a key part of the loss like it or not that's all I'm saying.

Edited by frankw
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Now that is a grown man answer! Would love to hear that from the face of our franchise.
    • The Lombardi video I posted in another thread a few minutes ago--Lombardi says, "You want to know what a team is going to do, look at the depth chart."  He also mentioned how only 27% of first round WRs succeed and how most of the good WRs in the NFL were day 2 and 3 players in the draft?  We have 2 30-year old ILBs (Jewell and Thompson).  Not much behind them at all.  LB is a huge need.  At CB, we have oft-injured Horn, Dane Jackson, and  33-year old Troy Hill at nickel.  Not much behind them.  At WR, we have Johnson (a decent X), Thielen (a solid slot in his last year), and Mingo, a second year player at Z.  Behind them, we have Smith Marsette and MAYBE TMJ.  We could use a player to challenge Mingo and/or to groom for the slot position.  I contend that this is not as big of a need early as LB or CB.  We could argue that C is in the cards.
    • well, we know generally.....we are going to end up missing on most of the guys we draft in reality.  Draft history says that.  Ours certainly does.  That's why I like the WR double dip in a great WR draft class.  Increases your odds of hitting on something that eventually works out.  and we don't have a first day pick.  as he said, day 2 and day 3 is often WR gold.  I still think top of round 2 is just a sweet spot for WR.  I think those hit rates are skewed.  C has a good first round hit rate.....because you rarely see any C ever drafted in the first round because of  how the league values it.   So it's almost can't miss super studs twisting folks arms to have to take them. 
×
×
  • Create New...