Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

  • panthers-redskins-1.jpg

Matt Rhule says the Panthers offense is about to have a "vastly different look," redefined with more of an emphasis on the run game.


SgtJoo
 Share

Recommended Posts

This thread, lol. Sounds like Rhule really leaked our game plan. Everyone knows now what we are gonna do… smdh.

1. we are not throwing 40x a game

2. we are not gonna turn the ball over

3. We are gonna protect the quarterback

 

man, if other teams figure out the above… our season is over…. /s

 

We're not going to line up and drop back and throw it 40 times a game and think that's going to win the game for us. It hasn't. There's no (Christian) McCaffrey. Well, Chuba (Hubbard) 's showing us that he can run the football at a high level when given enough opportunities. We're gonna redefine who we are, and we're gonna run the football, and we're gonna protect our quarterback, and we're not gonna turn the ball over anymore. That's the only way that we're gonna win.

Edited by TheCasillas
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, BIGH2001 said:

I did see that. And then for the last two off seasons we have done nothing to address our QB or OL situation. We signed a WR to a terrible contract and all those resources that went into defense are translating to losing.  So “rebuilding” is a scapegoat word for losing.  

I can see how you might feel that way but this roster is tremendously more talented and deep than it was at the beginning of this process. The QB and OL situation has been grossly mismanaged but the almost all of the rest of the roster has been improved dramatically. 

I have no qualms with the roster building outside QB/OL. If we fix that, this may very well be a good team.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

I have no qualms with the roster building outside QB/OL. If we fix that, this may very well be a good team.

All in all the roster is looking good. The bad spots are just super bad and make the whole house fall down. You see Paradis in the 20s again on grades...like bro that's barely existing.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Fox007 said:

All in all the roster is looking good. The bad spots are just super bad and make the whole house fall down. You see Paradis in the 20s again on grades...like bro that's barely existing.

I’m pretty sure an actual speed bump would grade at least in the 30s. 

  • Pie 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Moose Hoover said:

No punting, no kicking. Run it all 4 downs, go for 2 every time. Run blocking is much easier than pass blocking. Makes sense. Cuz they can't pass block for shiz

This is what I’ve been thinking also. I was dumbstruck when they went away from the run yesterday while Chuba was getting 5 yards a carry.

 If your offense is horrible at pass blocking, then they should be put in a position where they can attack the defense, instead of losing quickly when the QB drops back. This should help set up play action if they can pass out of the same formation that they use when running. When running more this may allow the defense to rest while the offense churns up the clock. They may not be a great zone blocking team, but it makes sense if they want to try and control the game. 

I don’t think that they should make this their offense after this year, but it may be the only option that works with the current Oline.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, kungfoodude said:

I don't think CMC is the cure for our offensive ails. He is a big help but he can't throw the ball, block for himself nor call the plays. 

Not the point.

You can’t get worse at a position group and then decide to lean heavily on that weakened unit.  It’s crazy. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, Killah_Ray said:

I’m pretty sure an actual speed bump would grade at least in the 30s. 

“The” speed bump had a PFF of 50 in 2017. That same year our C was a combo of Larsen and some Ryan and they averaged about a 60. Norwell was an 89. Daryl an 86 and Turner a 75. As much as the OL was panned for Cam, he had decent to top 5 OLs during the playoff runs. That 2017 OL was magical compared to the poo we have now.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, L-TownCat said:

Not the point.

You can’t get worse at a position group and then decide to lean heavily on that weakened unit.  It’s crazy. 

True but one thing we can't continue to do is rely on them to do what they do worst...pass block. Especially when you have a bottom tier decision maker at QB.

I am completely okay going with a revamped, run heavy offense. fug it, at least it is trying something different.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, kungfoodude said:

True but one thing we can't continue to do is rely on them to do what they do worst...pass block. Especially when you have a bottom tier decision maker at QB.

I am completely okay going with a revamped, run heavy offense. fug it, at least it is trying something different.

I totally get the line is terribad.

Run blocking is easier but it’s still the same group blocking for a rookie that’s about to get 30 touches.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, KSpan said:

Why announce this?

This is another thing that I wish he would not do. Just do it and don’t explain it to the fans. Actually, he doesn’t owe the fans any explanation at all. As a fan I am glad that he does, but he is setting himself up for a follow up explanation of what he says that the team is going to do doesn’t work. Some times the honesty just adds more pressure. This is one of the reasons that Fox and Rivera didn’t say sh!t and always uttered the same clichés in “It is what it is” , “Missed opportunities” and “The other team gets paid to make plays too”.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


×
×
  • Create New...