Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

  • panthers-redskins-1.jpg

Losing to the Giants - should someone get fired?


hepcat
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, weyco2000 said:

The only bad loss was the Eagles game, the other two were pretty much expected when the schedule was released. So, honestly you’re blowing things out of proportion.

I can't say enough how awful that Eagles loss was. One win team at home and give up a game winning drive to a qb with a bottom ranked qbr. It doesn't get much lower than that. Not quite 2010 bad but not that far off either. Truth is truth 🤷‍♂️

Edited by frankw
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, top dawg said:

Not a fan of reactionary mid season firings, particularly for a relatively young team and couching staff in what is essentially year two of a rebuild.

BTW, we were never as good as some thought we were. We're arguably a bottom 10 team ourselves even though no one wants to hear it. Plus, this is the NFL and "any given Sunday..."

Nicely stated.

To add to this, firing someone so soon can also send the message that Tepper, Rhule, and Fitt don't know what they are doing. Sure, some will claim it makes them look like they are quick to correct a mistake, but it really doesn't. Whoever the replacement is could be worse. Then toss in keeping Rivera and Hurney so long with the way Cam and then Teddy were treated, and it doesn't paint a pretty picture for current brain trust.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, jayboogieman said:

Nicely stated.

To add to this, firing someone so soon can also send the message that Tepper, Rhule, and Fitt don't know what they are doing. Sure, some will claim it makes them look like they are quick to correct a mistake, but it really doesn't. Whoever the replacement is could be worse. Then toss in keeping Rivera and Hurney so long with the way Cam and then Teddy were treated, and it doesn't paint a pretty picture for current brain trust.

I mean I don’t have a great endorsement of the current owner considering all the team has done since he bought the team is have massive losing streaks every season.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, hepcat said:

I mean I don’t have a great endorsement of the current owner considering all the team has done since he bought the team is have massive losing streaks every season.

Sadly what we think of Tepper or any other sports team owner doesn't matter one bit. They are the super wealthy and owning sports teams is just an ego stroke for them since they are exclusive clubs with few members. I wouldn't be surprised to see Tepper try buy a MLB team and the Hornets so he could claim to be the only or one of the very few owners of a team in all the major American sports.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, kungfoodude said:

This is a bit hyperbolic. Losing would suck but I don't think this is the moment the wheels necessarily come off nor should we start firing/hiring/etc.

a loss sunday and you can kiss what playoffs hope had goodbye and yes the wheels will start to come off hell the way tepper loooked sunday he already getting impaitent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Call Me James said:

I've always assumed the order of firings (if they were to happen mid-season) would go Snow (due to the investment in D), THEN Rhule, and lastly Brady as that would give them a chance to see how he performs as top dog as a young coach. 

Interesting, especially because it is possible Tepper is believing the boy genius hype.  I just don't see Rhule ever firing Snow.  And while you're right on the investments, the fact Rhule is forcing a change in gameplan/strategy on O tells me he isn't happy with Brady.  If Rhule tries to fire Brady, and if Tepper stepped in... would be interesting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Call Me James said:

I've always assumed the order of firings (if they were to happen mid-season) would go Snow (due to the investment in D), THEN Rhule, and lastly Brady as that would give them a chance to see how he performs as top dog as a young coach. 

Why would they fire the defensive coordinator first? He has the only unit playing at a high level on the year?   Plus, Snow is the only actual Matt Rhule guy of all the coordinators.  That's Rhule's guy.  The most impactful guy to Rhule's career success.  Temple and Baylor got to where they got under Rhule via Snow's defenses. 

Brady, Chase, position coaches, players.  Matt Rhule would throw a lot of guys into fire before Snow. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, 4Corners said:

Charlotte native and panthers fan Daniel Jones about to rip apart Phil Snows college defense. Bet he has his best game as a pro. 

Would you be willing to paypal bet a G?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, CRA said:

Why would they fire the defensive coordinator first? He has the only unit playing at a high level on the year?   Plus, Snow is the only actual Matt Rhule guy of all the coordinators.  That's Rhule's guy.  The most impactful guy to Rhule's career success.  Temple and Baylor got to where they got under Rhule via Snow's defenses. 

Brady, Chase, position coaches, players.  Matt Rhule would throw a lot of guys into fire before Snow. 

Because it's the area we've put in the largest investments. 

It's easy to say the offense isn't good because we have a bad OL and a bad QB and CMC is out. 

If anyone gets fired and that's a big if it will be because the defense doesn't find their early season form. The offense is what it is at this point. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, mav1234 said:

Interesting, especially because it is possible Tepper is believing the boy genius hype.  I just don't see Rhule ever firing Snow.  And while you're right on the investments, the fact Rhule is forcing a change in gameplan/strategy on O tells me he isn't happy with Brady.  If Rhule tries to fire Brady, and if Tepper stepped in... would be interesting.

I think if any firing happensto a coordinator it will be because Tepper forces the hand. 

I haven't been impressed with Brady at all, but what we don't know yet is how much of the team's offensive identity is truly his. 

It's all speculation. I don't see anyone getting fired this season. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Call Me James said:

Because it's the area we've put in the largest investments. 

It's easy to say the offense isn't good because we have a bad OL and a bad QB and CMC is out. 

If anyone gets fired and that's a big if it will be because the defense doesn't find their early season form. The offense is what it is at this point. 

 

 

and it's the #3 rated D.  #6 in points.   And he is currently without the leader of the D and his first rounder. 

I mean, they literally gifted wrapped one of the losses, the Philly game....and the O still managed to give it away. 

9 minutes left in the game on Sunday....the Panther offense had 80 passing yards on the day.  And you don't understand why the Panther D ended up having a bad day vs one of the best offenses in terms of skill position players? 

The D was probably better in the Philly game than the Houston game.  With even the most average offense that day....it's a blow out.  

  bad offense quarter after quarter....means a good defense will end up giving yards and points. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • sam.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • There are very very few HCs that go beyond 10 years with one team, it’s almost unheard of. And it certainly does not consist of coaches not being able to win back to back season or who averages 8 wins a season over that span  with a team full of talent. Ron does best when his back is against the wall and he is forced to make moves. Aka injured starters, losing record etc. Notice ones the WFT started losing he is taking big chances in games. I think he goes for it on 4th more than anyone. Ron has grit. He will rally poor talent. He will make anyone soft tougher, he won’t have a really shirt 1/2 win season. However when he has choices, when he has options, and he must evaluate…he will fail. He cannot and will not adapt when his way does not work. His and Fox’s mantra has always been screw mismatches, schemes, or attacking vulnerabilities. It’s 1v1, man vs. man. Period. No matter what. And let the best man win, and if he’ll lose, it’ll be his way. This will breed mediocre success and, with the right personal, it can even go pretty far. Hell in the 90s, I think he would easily be a SB winning coach. However today there are two problems with that model, the inability to adapt. First there is no consistency. It won’t hold up over a period of time. Second, players now are different as are coaches.   They adapt and scheme, analytics and all that. They are playing positions differently. If you aren’t able to adapt and utilize the modern talent of players like Cam, CMC, or even Luke (towards the end of his career in the 3-4), aren’t able to evaluate talent on the sidelines but instead go for heart of a player,  ‘lose my way’ path of evaluating, instead trying to foster/come up with ideas for new talent, it will never be sustainable. All that said, in summary, he is a good ‘rollercoaster’ coach with the right personnel, in the right circumstance, with his back up against the wall. Living and dying by the sword will being some success, no failure, and a mass amount of mediocrity.
    • This needs to happen at minimum. I really do question his eye for talent. If he doesn't like it, then he goes the way of Chip Kelly.
×
×
  • Create New...