Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

O Line Talent Evaluation


CWalker4205
 Share

Recommended Posts

Is it just me or do we suck at finding talent on the O line, no matter who our GM is? 
 

The Steelers are starting a 3rd round rookie at center, 4th round rookie at LT, and Trai freaking Turner at RG and they are keeping a clean pocket for Rothlisberger, and he’s a damn statue.

Every damn year it seems like there are rookies starting all over the league and we have 2 rooks who can’t sniff the field.

 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, CWalker4205 said:

Is it just me or do we suck at finding talent on the O line, no matter who our GM is? 
 

The Steelers are starting a 3rd round rookie at center, 4th round rookie at LT, and Trai freaking Turner at RG and they are keeping a clean pocket for Rothlisberger, and he’s a damn statue.

Every damn year it seems like there are rookies starting all over the league and we have 2 rooks who can’t sniff the field.

 

Just imagine

Slater-Jordan/Elflein-Creed Humphrey-Trey Smith-Moton

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 2
  • The D 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, CWalker4205 said:

Is it just me or do we suck at finding talent on the O line, no matter who our GM is? 
 

The Steelers are starting a 3rd round rookie at center, 4th round rookie at LT, and Trai freaking Turner at RG and they are keeping a clean pocket for Rothlisberger, and he’s a damn statue.

Every damn year it seems like there are rookies starting all over the league and we have 2 rooks who can’t sniff the field.

 

We are bad at finding offensive talent atp.  Hard to deny this

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, BlackPanther21_ said:

Just imagine

Slater-Jordan/Elflein-Creed Humphrey-Trey Smith-Moton

I do wonder just how different our offense would have looked this year if we had gone Slater/Smith. 

DJ had Slater over Sewell and many thought he would be just fine at tackle. Can't cry over spilled milk, but seeing how we ended up with Gilmore and Henderson via trade, and Taylor looks like a long-term piece, it is frustrating. Not to mention taking a long-snapper instead of a need at guard while Jansen is still doing his thing.....pretty pathetic.

I say this as a huge fan of Horn too. 

  • Pie 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, BlackPanther21_ said:

Just imagine

Slater-Jordan/Elflein-Creed Humphrey-Trey Smith-Moton

Even one of those moves would hold a drastic difference on our line. The whole Trey Smith falling in the draft was absurd to me and never understood why we didnt take him later in the draft.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, shaq said:

Even one of those moves would hold a drastic difference on our line. The whole Trey Smith falling in the draft was absurd to me and never understood why we didnt take him later in the draft.

The most frustrating part is we took a FRIGGEN LONG SNAPPER over him, while Jansen is still playing at a high level and the interior line continues to be an issue.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, CWalker4205 said:

Is it just me or do we suck at finding talent on the O line, no matter who our GM is? 
 

The Steelers are starting a 3rd round rookie at center, 4th round rookie at LT, and Trai freaking Turner at RG and they are keeping a clean pocket for Rothlisberger, and he’s a damn statue.

Every damn year it seems like there are rookies starting all over the league and we have 2 rooks who can’t sniff the field.

 


And yet, according to these stats, their pass blocking is worse than us.

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's not worth the time/pining thinking about Trey Smith.  Slater, yes, is a legit LT/G we should have taken over Horn.  The second being Sam Cosmi over Marshall Rd2 and not trading down.  Would have been a perfect Rd1-2. 

It's all pointless at this stage, but we've got 70th overall in Brady C. and then Moton.  Brady isn't even a for sure future G for us but at least still has the potential IMO for a long term LG.  We have an entire line to build.  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Qu1million said:

We still need a QB

Draft QB round 1. Thats what is going to happen. Rhule will be forced to keep Darnold due to contract and we will have to draft a QB. Thats what is going to happen even if we don't want it to because Rhule will be on the hot seat. It's why we need to start discussing this years QB class. Dan Morgan was just at Pitt this weekend watching Pickett. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was curious so just glancing at drafts from franchises with somewhat consistent top olines like saints, browns, post luck colts, patriots, cowboys, Bucs…

the amount of olineman in general drafted is actually pretty much on par somewhat, I mean some of those teams draft olineman at least once every draft with a top half pick, and even double dip

but what I notice is their later rounds, they’re able to find real talent such as patriots finding Onwenu in the 5th last year meanwhile we took some unknown CB (shocking)

add that to the fact Panthers make the absolute worst oline FA decisions…can anyone name a good FA olineman that played for average or above more than a single year in our entire history? I can’t 

so I would say it is a lack in the ability to evaluate talent, coach talent, and lack of trying in the draft and severely overreaching/poor evaluation in FA

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Any QB worth his weight in gold is going to get his guys the ball. Of course he has to have the protection, coaching and experience to do that. Moreover, it has yet to be determined what type of situation this is for a rookie wideout. The most important thing that will determine that is coaching.
    • I watched it this afternoon and I thought some of the best discussions was before it even got to the players. One thing that really jumped out to me was when Smitty was asked about how things have changed since he played and the thing he talked about was how when he played and going back to Jerry Rice says, the #1 targeted or looked to receiver was always the X and there's still a lot of people who's minds are still stuck in that idea. But what has happened is that the, what he calls, the F receiver...the flanker...is now the go to guy. You need the X to try and get safeties out of the box, but the QB is now looking for his flanker most of the time. Lots of good discussions all through it, but for some reason the ones involving Ladd, Corley, and Leggette was the most interesting. Ladd was how he may be best fit for just the slot, but he's the best slot guy in the draft and he's just a guy who gets open and doesn't drop the ball. Corley and Leggette are playmakers who are at a risk of being pigeonholed. Leggette is too stiff to be a slot guy but he can do things like Metcalf. Corley is likely to be used much as he was in college, as the big playmaker you just get the ball in his hands however you can, but he's got a lot of room for development as a receiver. It's just good football talk all the way through  
    • I'd resigned myself to 2000 and never.   Cautiously optimistic based on this off season that 2026 is a real possibility. 
×
×
  • Create New...