Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Myles Turner


Shocker
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Shocker said:

You don’t value Myles as much…thats fine.  My last trade didn’t include Hayward since I don’t see the Pacers wanting him.  Better yet.  We win now and they rebuild.  I was never a huge Bouknight fan tbh

BTW…Sabonis coming here would be retarded.  I never even considered that as a possible option.  That guy is a fuggin amazing scorer 

Yeah he is a legit all star big man who would be worthy of the Pacers crazy demands.

Also PJ is like the perfect fit at the 4 next to him.

The Pacers keeping Turner because they overvalue him instead of trying to find a better fit next to Sabonis and properly building around him has hindered their team for 2+ seasons now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Eazy-E said:

No way in hell I'm giving them Terry and a first.

If we're talking Terry and a first Sabonis better be involved in that conversation.

The reason I said I would give up Terry is because the team has more than enough scoring without him. They need defense and rebounding. Plus giving up Terry gives more cap room to resign Miles.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, jayboogieman said:

The reason I said I would give up Terry is because the team has more than enough scoring without him. They need defense and rebounding. Plus giving up Terry gives more cap room to resign Miles.

I'd be fine with moving Terry or Gordon if it was for a Sabonis or Jarrett Allen caliber center. Not Myles Turner.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Eazy-E said:

Just wanted to add team chemistry is at an all time high with this team. Listen to any interview with the players recently and they all talk about how that has been the key to their success this season.

I'd be very hesitant to mess with that.

This is true…playoff team if we are healthy so need to tread lightly with Pacer trade demands

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Now that is a grown man answer! Would love to hear that from the face of our franchise.
    • The Lombardi video I posted in another thread a few minutes ago--Lombardi says, "You want to know what a team is going to do, look at the depth chart."  He also mentioned how only 27% of first round WRs succeed and how most of the good WRs in the NFL were day 2 and 3 players in the draft?  We have 2 30-year old ILBs (Jewell and Thompson).  Not much behind them at all.  LB is a huge need.  At CB, we have oft-injured Horn, Dane Jackson, and  33-year old Troy Hill at nickel.  Not much behind them.  At WR, we have Johnson (a decent X), Thielen (a solid slot in his last year), and Mingo, a second year player at Z.  Behind them, we have Smith Marsette and MAYBE TMJ.  We could use a player to challenge Mingo and/or to groom for the slot position.  I contend that this is not as big of a need early as LB or CB.  We could argue that C is in the cards.
    • well, we know generally.....we are going to end up missing on most of the guys we draft in reality.  Draft history says that.  Ours certainly does.  That's why I like the WR double dip in a great WR draft class.  Increases your odds of hitting on something that eventually works out.  and we don't have a first day pick.  as he said, day 2 and day 3 is often WR gold.  I still think top of round 2 is just a sweet spot for WR.  I think those hit rates are skewed.  C has a good first round hit rate.....because you rarely see any C ever drafted in the first round because of  how the league values it.   So it's almost can't miss super studs twisting folks arms to have to take them. 
×
×
  • Create New...