Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Malik Willis Pro Day


 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, The Huddler said:

I wanted Willis

 

 

but after looking into him...  does he actaully have a QB brain?   missing 1st reads and stuff.  might not process the play in real time. 

Compare to:

  • Joe Burrow: 34
  • Tom Brady: 33
  • Kirk Cousins: 33
  • Russell Wilson: 28
  • Dak Prescott: 25
  • Ben Roethlisberger: 25
  • Patrick Mahomes: 24
  • Peyton Manning: 28
  • Brett Favre: 22

Scouts have been literally gushing over how smart dude is put some respect on his name.

Edited by MechaZain
  • Pie 5
  • Flames 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, MechaZain said:

Compare to:

  • Joe Burrow: 34
  • Tom Brady: 33
  • Kirk Cousins: 33
  • Russell Wilson: 28
  • Dak Prescott: 25
  • Ben Roethlisberger: 25
  • Patrick Mahomes: 24
  • Peyton Manning: 28
  • Brett Favre: 22

Scouts have been literally gushing over how smart dude is put some respect on his name.

Mahomes and Geno Smith had the same wonderlic score. It's honestly meaningless.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, micnificent28 said:

Just because something hasn't been done doesn't mean it can't. Before cam most of the league didn't really care for a dual threat qb. Afterwards it basically became the norm. If 90% of the league have pocket qbs of course it is going to be rarer for running qbs to win Super Bowls.

Also each individual is different. I haven't heard one person say Willis isn't accurate. Where as they killed cam about it.

 

That's true, but you still can't ignore trends. Mobile QB's that can avoid the pass rush win titles. Roger Staubach, John Elway, Terry Bradshaw, Big Ben , Steve Young, Russell Wilson are what I classify as mobile QBs. All of these guys had wheels, but ultimately they beat you from the pocket with big time throws in big time games.

Running QB's don't, or at least so far, win  championships. They put up highlight reel runs and are fun to watch. But, they tend to end their careers without a SB ring.  Their careers tend to end a bit prematurely as well due to the hits they absorb.  I'd take a statue in the pocket that can read and pick a part a defense behind a good O-line over a running QB any day of the week.

Edited by SCO96
  • Pie 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, micnificent28 said:

Stop it

Screenshot_20220322-095322_Chrome.jpg

QBs better than Lamar in no particular order

Brady

Wilson

Rodgers 

Stafford

Allen

Mahomes

Watson

 

So he's somewhere around 8 to 10th .

I only consider Brady Rodgers Mahomes elite. 

Then great

Then very good. He's in the very good category. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Any QB worth his weight in gold is going to get his guys the ball. Of course he has to have the protection, coaching and experience to do that. Moreover, it has yet to be determined what type of situation this is for a rookie wideout. The most important thing that will determine that is coaching.
    • I watched it this afternoon and I thought some of the best discussions was before it even got to the players. One thing that really jumped out to me was when Smitty was asked about how things have changed since he played and the thing he talked about was how when he played and going back to Jerry Rice says, the #1 targeted or looked to receiver was always the X and there's still a lot of people who's minds are still stuck in that idea. But what has happened is that the, what he calls, the F receiver...the flanker...is now the go to guy. You need the X to try and get safeties out of the box, but the QB is now looking for his flanker most of the time. Lots of good discussions all through it, but for some reason the ones involving Ladd, Corley, and Leggette was the most interesting. Ladd was how he may be best fit for just the slot, but he's the best slot guy in the draft and he's just a guy who gets open and doesn't drop the ball. Corley and Leggette are playmakers who are at a risk of being pigeonholed. Leggette is too stiff to be a slot guy but he can do things like Metcalf. Corley is likely to be used much as he was in college, as the big playmaker you just get the ball in his hands however you can, but he's got a lot of room for development as a receiver. It's just good football talk all the way through  
    • I'd resigned myself to 2000 and never.   Cautiously optimistic based on this off season that 2026 is a real possibility. 
×
×
  • Create New...