James Bradberry

[KatsAzz]

1 hour ago, rayzor said:

Good luck to him, where ever he lands....it won't be here.

 

This

[Proudiddy]

12 minutes ago, Waldo said:

I thought he was a strong zone CB? Maybe I am completely getting that wrong.

Looked it up and it said he was strong in zone schemes and bad in man. Giants stuff

you could be right, but although we ran a zone scheme under Ron, we drafted him to lock up the bigger receivers in our division like Evans, Julio, and Michael Thomas, which is what he did really well when manned up on them.

With the Giants, maybe his struggles in man may be due to him losing a step or maybe he was dealing with injuries?

[Waldo]

Just now, Proudiddy said:

you could be right, but although we ran a zone scheme under Ron, we drafted him to lock up the bigger receivers in our division like Evans, Julio, and Michael Thomas, which is what he did really well when manned up on them.

With the Giants, maybe his struggles in man may be due to him losing a step or maybe he was dealing with injuries?

He was like Norman (his one year), zone CB that locked up good WRs. Kind of looked like man but he just didn't have the speed for true man play. Was true for both when their new teams went the other way to hard. 

He is still only 28. If you play heavy zone he is a great CB to have. 

[Proudiddy]

1 minute ago, Waldo said:

He was like Norman (his one year), zone CB that locked up good WRs. Kind of looked like man but he just didn't have the speed for true man play. Was true for both when their new teams went the other way to hard. 

He is still only 28. If you play heavy zone he is a great CB to have. 

Good points...  it could've been primarily zone.  I just know he mirrored the #1s in our division, and from memory, it often appeared he ran with them for the entirety of their routes...  and i could've swore we drafted him to play more man.  At least thats how i remember it.  But, I know we ran a zone heavy scheme.  

I'll go with your take though.  Either way, I don't think it's gonna be relevant to us.

[Shocker]

**cough…overrated***

[Waldo]

13 minutes ago, Proudiddy said:

Good points...  it could've been primarily zone.  I just know he mirrored the #1s in our division, and from memory, it often appeared he ran with them for the entirety of their routes...  and i could've swore we drafted him to play more man.  At least thats how i remember it.  But, I know we ran a zone heavy scheme.  

I'll go with your take though.  Either way, I don't think it's gonna be relevant to us.

They both ran with the good WRs, they just had a safety over top and they were under. Without that safety and the other team can just make it a speed thing.

[ThPantherFan]

1 hour ago, Waldo said:

IDK, zone CB play is something I don't miss.

Maybe a switch to safety? I would guess someone would pay him more than our needs allow. Solid player and guy, dependable if you don't ask the world of him. 

He's too old to switch to safety.

[Waldo]

1 minute ago, ThPantherFan said:

He's too old to switch to safety.

28? Check out Charles Woodson's career

[mc52beast]

A lot of people talked trash about Brad but he was one of a select few who you could trust to limit opposing #1’s. 

[Cpt slay a ho]

 Chiefs probably will grab him 

[Pimpdaddy]

...normally don't like players we had come back...feel like they're traitors... so, no for me dawg..plus he got some gettleman stench on him...

[RJK]

We literally don’t need him 

[pantherj]

0% chance he's coming here.

[hepcat]

2 hours ago, rayzor said:

Yeah he'll be in Washington or Buffalo. Probably with Rivera.

Easily going to play for Ron