Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Add sexual assault to the Dan Snyder allegations


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, Riverboat Ron said:

They’ll probably just try to turn the narrative to her breaking the NDA and say she’s untrustworthy because she broke a legally binding agreement, ignoring the fact of the sexual assault.

Not so sure about that.

If the NFL wants Snyder gone (and there's plenty of evidence to suggest they do) then he's gonna have a rough time making this go away.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, SizzleBuzz said:

So what are the expectations on "NDA's"...

...should ladies who have accepted a large cash-payments in lieu of signing an "NDA" and agreed to keep their mouth shut...

...be required to live up to the legally binding agreement they committed to?

Or not?

Can we get you to sign an NDA to stop posting here 

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 2
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, SizzleBuzz said:

So what are the expectations on "NDA's"...

...should ladies who have accepted a large cash-payments in lieu of signing an "NDA" and agreed to keep their mouth shut...

...be required to live up to the legally binding agreement they committed to?

Or not?

Good grief. Does your billionaire simping know no bounds?

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
  • Flames 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Good grief. Does your billionaire simping know no bounds?

Actually, what I'm getting at is...

...should the 20 ladies who are entering into NDA's with Mr. Whip-It-Out expected to live up to their contractual obligations in return for the cash payments they will collect?

Or, once they collect the cash are they free to violate the legally-binding contract they signed and go on and spill the goods publicly?

What say ye?

Edited by SizzleBuzz
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, SizzleBuzz said:

Actually, what I'm getting at is...

...should the 20 ladies who are entering into NDA's with Mr. Whip-It-Out expected to live up to their contractual obligations in return for the cash payments they will collect?

Or, once they collect the cash are they free to violate the legally-binding contract they signed and go on and spill the goods publicly?

What say ye?

They are subject to legal ramifications in some situations such as, say, blasting on a media platform for no purpose other than for defamation. That can include monetary.

But it’s not that simple. NDAs are not some sort of top secret kept until death issuance no one has a right to. NDA’s are a ‘private contract’ and are not exempt from the law. They aren’t exempt from a judge. The information is not even exempt from lawyers. They especially, aren’t exempt when similar behavior branches out into other, similar, separate crimes. Even if unrelated. 

NDAs can be ordered to be disclosed under a variety of conditions and what the media does with it, should they be able to obtain the information, is not in the control of the designee or parties of the NDA.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • My personal take- RB market is in the most unstable era. For one its very very low in cost and the talent available each year is 8-14 players most years. Not to mention all the cuts. Right now Id have drop all RBs a couple rounds. Just would not draft one cause a proven bunch is going for 5mill+/- each FA period. I am a huge TE fan, my goal would be to control the middle of the field. History shows rounds 3-5 is where to get one. I think the last 10 TE drafted in the first round only one has made a pro bowl and that was 30 year old David Njoku this past year. They are soooo undervalued, no other player has to block some 6'5 280 monster and on the next play run a deep post against some 4.2 speed water bug guy. I'd have two of the highest paid TEs and no one would know if its a pass or run. I don't like this years class, but always up to draft one......starting in the 3rd....  
    • I'd do not understand that both verge and zod had a three year run of getting the 1st round pick right, then the first time they missed.......non-stop tard comments about the miss and they totally forgot the past three years. I know its near impossible to guess a 25th pick, but I remember shaq being his guess. Just insane the whole deal. 
    • Im about 98% sure penix gos 15th-32nd in the first, jmo...I'd even bet on that too. Hes my weakness of boom/bust, if he figures it out......It would be scary for any team playing him.  I mean young has to get another year given all the BS and I totally get the the issue if he was there 33rd. Id draft him, but you'd HAVE to trade young before unless you'd want to de-value him by a few rounds. Top eight pick with the guaranteed penix would be at 33rd......ooo my the amount of should/if/etc....
×
×
  • Create New...