Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

More behind the scenes info on the Mayfield trade


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

10 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

whereas Fitterer and Rhule were once lukewarm on the idea of trading for Mayfield

I'm not sold on the idea of Rhule being lukewarm on the trade. Fitt I can see since he had just drafted his Russell Wilson hopeful in the third round of the draft and probably didn't want to give up too many assets for another QB.

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, jayboogieman said:

I'm not sold on the idea of Rhule being lukewarm on the trade. Fitt I can see since he had just drafted his Russell Wilson hopeful in the third round of the draft and probably didn't want to give up too many assets for another QB.

Me neither, they openly admit they think Corral needs to sit a year and they know they can't trot Darnold out there again. Hate how they get to act like they didn't get us in this situation in the first place. The only other ridiculous camp battle is really Seattle and they're in tank mode

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's not hard to believe Fitterer was lukewarm on it given the multiple times he said the best option was to draft a quarterback and build around him. He even stated after the draft that this was the plan with Corral.

Rhule? Don't know. History would tell us he prefers a veteran. Mayfield specifically? Unknown.

Among his assistants, we know that McAdoo was high on Corral and not so high on Mayfield the year he was drafted.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

It's not hard to believe Fitterer was lukewarm on it given the multiple times he said the best option was to draft a quarterback and build around him. He even stated after the draft that this was the plan with Corral.

Rhule? Don't know. History would tell us he prefers a veteran. Mayfield specifically? Unknown.

Among his assistants, we know that McAdoo was high on Corral and not so high on Mayfield the year he was drafted.

It has been said from inside the organization that Rhule was always lukewarm on the idea.  I think it has been confirmed by the timing.  If this was something Rhule really wanted it would have happened a while back.  Probably at the draft. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Mr. Scot said:

From Albert Breer (MMQB)

From there, coach Matt Rhule talked football with the quarterback,

And yet, Baker STILL wanted to come here.

 

(although seriously -- have we heard from people who know whether Rhule truly is a players' coach vs what we see and comment on here?)

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Jackie Lee said:

Me neither, they openly admit they think Corral needs to sit a year and they know they can't trot Darnold out there again. Hate how they get to act like they didn't get us in this situation in the first place. The only other ridiculous camp battle is really Seattle and they're in tank mode

Although I agree they got us into the situation with an overpaid Darnold, the QB room was one of the worst in the NFL before they got here.  They took a shot with Darnold - a little too expensive, but a reasonable shot to take given their options.  They didn't make a mistake in the 2021 draft ( could get proven wrong but not yet - Fields & Mac aren't the answer).  They didn't make a mistake in the 2022 draft.  Their free agent moves have pretty much all been very good.  

I do believe it is mostly Fitt, so I'm all for Rhule taking blame, but truthfully Rhule walked into a crapshow and Fitt has done about as well as anyone could given what he has had to work with.  Getting Rhule out is fine but I love Fitt so far...no issue with him acting like he isn't at fault.

  • Pie 6
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think we all know that this is a QB competition in name only.  Baker is going to be QB1, Week 1 versus Cleveland.  They would not have made this deal if they were comfortable with Darnold being the starting QB again this year. 

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, PanthersATL said:

If Baker *isn't* QB1 vs Cleveland, this fanbase is going to be angry.

Baker had better be the most fired-up, locker-room leader for that game.  

Yeah, if barring injury, Sam starts another game for us, we fuging riot.  And I dont mean Roaring.

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Tr3ach said:

It has been said from inside the organization that Rhule was always lukewarm on the idea.  I think it has been confirmed by the timing.  If this was something Rhule really wanted it would have happened a while back.  Probably at the draft. 

We tried to trade for Mayfield during the draft.

As far as Rhule not wanting him, the only source I've ever seen say that was the guy on the huddle who had nothing to back it up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


×
×
  • Create New...