Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Johnathen Taylor for Cmac ? (Fantasy)


Leotiger
 Share

Recommended Posts

8 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

Personally, I think the Colts have been so run heavy due to their limitations at QB... I expect them this year to attempt to air it out a bit more. Jonathan Taylor isnt known to be a receving back , but Hines is. Healthy CMC over JT all day, but thats the tough part.

Some years back, I saw a Falcon fan asking who was better between an injured Michael Vick and a healthy Chris Chandler.

They later said it was a trick question because there was no such thing as a healthy Chris Chandler 😕

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As much as people complain, these minor injuries that cost CMC the last two years are probably good for his longevity we weren't going to win anything and he would have racked up anther 600 touches.... If we had been in contention I don't think he sits most of last season. 

 

26 is usually a running backs peak.... Healthy CMC *knocks on wood* He's gonna lead the NFL in fantasy points.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

From a fantasy perspective, Taylor normally goes 1 and cmc goes 2.

 

Taylor is seen as a safer pick with a good floor and ceiling.

However, cmc is thought to have a higher ceiling because of his role in the passing game but obviously all his missed games make him more risky to give you zeros.  Foreman is basically free in fantasy.  If I take cmc, I'm also taking Foreman and stashing him.

I'm still taking Taylor above cmc given the choice.  But I think cmc has to be the 2nd pick behind him.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

it all depends on how your league is set up. If the RB gets a point per reception then CMC must be in the conversation. Our O line is improved, we have an actual OC, and a QB that can stretch a defense (Baker, obviously)

Other contenders are Henry, Eckler and maybe Cooper Kupp if you're rolling the dice on a WR 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I don't think we should look at this rebuild position by position. That'll take many years.  Football isn't played that way. It's the ultimate team sport. Pass rush is not dependent on one player or position. Pass coverage is not dependent on just the secondary. Passing is dependent on the entire oline and your receivers. Rushing is not dependent only on the running back.  They've addressed every major area. That's all you can ask for. Make good decisions during the draft, and then it's the coaches turn to put it all together. 
    • It's tough. Yet again, such a huge roster flip. 10 starters added via FA/Trade - LG, RG, WR, TE, CB, S, ILB, (2) OLB, & (1) DL And then, whether internal moves/promotion/coming off injury, our starting C, TE, and other ILB (Shaq) will be different from last season. So we're looking at 13 new starters for a 2-15 team.  Losing Luvu stung a bit, but the rest were all understandable moves.  I am whelmed.  Without knowing results, it's a B for this team mid-reconstruction. Problem I still see--I don't know how we're going to generate offense with our current RB & Receiving rooms.  Dionte is a good addition but we still have no one to really become the "dude" on offense.    We're still pretty sparse and needing the Kyren, Achane, St. Brown, Collins, DeVonta type addition that could help this team do something, anything on offense.  The player that can help truly define an offense if you don't have a QB that's a top-level playmaker.     The good news is that I think we have a OL that will be able to pave lanes for that type of threat, we just need to land one now.        
    • That is Morgan's supposed job. Get Canales and Evero the folks they want while fitting it in the cap.
×
×
  • Create New...