Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Johnathen Taylor for Cmac ? (Fantasy)


Leotiger
 Share

Recommended Posts

8 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

Personally, I think the Colts have been so run heavy due to their limitations at QB... I expect them this year to attempt to air it out a bit more. Jonathan Taylor isnt known to be a receving back , but Hines is. Healthy CMC over JT all day, but thats the tough part.

Some years back, I saw a Falcon fan asking who was better between an injured Michael Vick and a healthy Chris Chandler.

They later said it was a trick question because there was no such thing as a healthy Chris Chandler 😕

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As much as people complain, these minor injuries that cost CMC the last two years are probably good for his longevity we weren't going to win anything and he would have racked up anther 600 touches.... If we had been in contention I don't think he sits most of last season. 

 

26 is usually a running backs peak.... Healthy CMC *knocks on wood* He's gonna lead the NFL in fantasy points.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

From a fantasy perspective, Taylor normally goes 1 and cmc goes 2.

 

Taylor is seen as a safer pick with a good floor and ceiling.

However, cmc is thought to have a higher ceiling because of his role in the passing game but obviously all his missed games make him more risky to give you zeros.  Foreman is basically free in fantasy.  If I take cmc, I'm also taking Foreman and stashing him.

I'm still taking Taylor above cmc given the choice.  But I think cmc has to be the 2nd pick behind him.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

it all depends on how your league is set up. If the RB gets a point per reception then CMC must be in the conversation. Our O line is improved, we have an actual OC, and a QB that can stretch a defense (Baker, obviously)

Other contenders are Henry, Eckler and maybe Cooper Kupp if you're rolling the dice on a WR 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I haven't seen the whole thing but what I saw I really liked. Yeah....seems like a whole lot of "well....duh" basic poo, but that's what we've been missing here. Everything they did has been hodge podge for years. There has been no real vision and no real collaboration. There's always just been one guy making the call on everything. It was Hurney, then Rhule, then Fitt. Canales comes in "as a newb" eager to learn, but in the process he gets everyone on the same page. Starts with the basics and with that created a floor, a foundation, to build on. Should they need to start over? No. Should they start over! Yes. It's pathetic that we have to start all over. But that's where we are. Get over it and get past it. We were built haphazardly. The closest abd most recent thing we've had to an actual decent plan was when we drafted Cam and out in what ever extra pieces we needed...namely two big vet TEs. We had the remnant of a decent OL and stud RBs and a legendary WR already here. There was very little we needed to succeed right out of the gate, but they knew a rookie QB was going to need a slid run game and big-time reliable passing targets including those stud RBs. When after that initial year, things started falling to crap slowl and then Gettleman came and really started fugging things up like some kind of fat al pacino wannabe gangster. Ever since then we've just thrown poo at the wall and hoped it worked. We tried to be clever without any clear vision of what we wanted the team to be. I think Rhule thought he did, but he was built for coaching motivating kids who don't know that he doesn't really know poo about football. Point is, we've been walking around aimless for over a decade. We now have it abd for that im especially grateful. Are they saying all the right things? I sure hope the hell they are because it sounds like they really know way they are doing. One thing that I really appreciated was Canales giving the scouts unsolicited praise and talked about how they were brought into the meetings with the coaching staff who, coach by coach, position by position, said what they were looking for and then took the scouting work they had already done and continued it to prepare for this draft. It sounds like an actual collaboration where the scouts know what the coaches are looking for and work to pair up players with the team, trying to find, what they called, the right panther fit. Again, sounds pretty elementary abd basic, but also again, this is something we haven't had. I remember going back to hurney's time I remember hearing sentiments from scouts who would do a ton of research on players leading up to the draft and when the draft was going on they would try to give their input based on months and sometimes years of watching these guys, going to their games, watching tape, meeting with players, teammates, position coaches, teachers, even family to try and get good insight on all the prospects, only to be treated like they weren't even in the room. They'd get excited about a pick coming up and who they thought would be a good fit and Hurney would just go another direction and then they would be questioning why they even bothered. Hurney did what Hurney was going to do without any input from anyone else. Rhule did the same thing. And then Fitt did the same damn thing after that power was taken away from Rhule. Sorry for all the words, but I really do feel like we're heading in the right direction.
    • Canucks lead Jets 1-0 in the first, game is on ESPN+. Jets just tied it 1-1 nice.
    • There's still a few FA centers they might(should) look into after the draft. I hope it's not just to avoid hurting Corbetts feelings or some soft bs like that. At the very least they need another body for camp and unless they take a C high it should probably be a vet since Corbett and Cade aren't exactly well versed at the position
×
×
  • Create New...