Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers release first depth chart


Jackie Lee
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, Jackie Lee said:

Even the Seahawks listed Geno over Lock, Steelers Trubisky/Rudolph/Pickett in order. The Bozeman/Elflein co-starter is the real kicker for me, so unnecessary 

My week 1 prediction is that we play Bozeman at guard.  Because we are dumb.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Carl Spackler said:

Yeah, I even edited it and I just left out "don't," which was on me. Just tired of drives home from work feeling like there's 5 to go at Talladega.

what pisses me off is the people going 30 over in the right lane.... so fuging dangerous. Getting to an exit is more dangerous than running a red light.

Edited by TheCasillas
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Have we ever had a time where we had co starters on our depth chart?

Rhule is such a big P.  Have the fortitude to name who's the starter at this point.  Nothing is written in stone that is the way it will play out.  The QB depth chart is stupid.   Either Baker or Sam, pick one.  Corral is #3.  There is no way we ever cut Corral. 

RB room too Chubby or Foreman.

We sure as hell didn't sign Bozeman to be a backup.  He's clearly the better center.

It's just insane that Rhule doesn't want to hurt anyone feelings as to where they currently stand.

One thing I did see that is interesting.  Kaylon Barnes is ahead of STO.  He could be a steal for such a late round pick. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, DaveThePanther2008 said:

Have we ever had a time where we had co starters on our depth chart?

Rhule is such a big P.  Have the fortitude to name who's the starter at this point.  Nothing is written in stone that is the way it will play out.  The QB depth chart is stupid.   Either Baker or Sam, pick one.  Corral is #3.  There is no way we ever cut Corral. 

RB room too Chubby or Foreman.

We sure as hell didn't sign Bozeman to be a backup.  He's clearly the better center.

It's just insane that Rhule doesn't want to hurt anyone feelings as to where they currently stand.

One thing I did see that is interesting.  Kaylon Barnes is ahead of STO.  He could be a steal for such a late round pick. 

Pretty sure I've seen it in prior depth charts, but at those times it may have been legitimate competition.

Elflein vs Bozeman is kinda hard to see is legitimate.

Again, the issue comes down to trust. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, CRA said:

Well, I am a fan.  My eyeballs tell me Baker is better than Sam and it really isn’t close.   Our coaches see it different.   I concede I don’t look at players like them. 

and I still like Chinn better in the box more given how our run D looks right now on paper.  Folks are going to be running at us and he is a good player even if still raw.  He was a rookie that made a run at DPOY.  We need more playmakers/talent in there mixing it up IMO.   I wouldn’t call it just 2 freak plays either as a rookie. 

Tackle totals by themselves aren't really that great of a stat, even in regards to run defense.  The same year he led the team in tackles, Boston was 3rd, does that mean Boston is great against the run?

What if he made the tackle a yard later than an average player would do?  that's bad, yard sooner?  that's good.  

If you really want to see how stupid this LB vs S argument is go look at his snap counts by position the past two years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I mean I'd like to add a monster TE as much as anyone else but ultimately what use will that serve with a QB who had 54 passing yards in 4 quarters at one point last season? Defense defense defense.
    • Personally I think he's a nightmare to cover I think linebackers generally aren't fast enough to keep up with him in coverage and cornerbacks don't have the strength to tackle him one-on-one in physically bring them down which would normally lead to a broken tackle or a nasty stiff arm or just bully ball play sure you could find a receiver with comparable speed like Cooper but he's faster than Cooper sure you can find a wide receiver that is the same size but he's probably More powerful than them and a better blocker.  The size speed athleticism package that he is in is completely unique it's easier to say I'd rather have just a big blocker because we've never seen this type of profile before I'm a risk taker I think you would be God blessed if this was there at 19 I think if you can get a guy that's a tight end who immediately becomes the fastest guy on your offense and at the same time that third wide receiver that can stretch and burn defenses over the top that's the perfect what the Panthers need type weapon.
    • I think you're under selling Sadiq. They are two different players in terms of how they win. Loveland is 2 inches taller maybe 5-6 pounds heavier. Comparing his speed to sadiq.. well your comparing a 4.7 guy to a 4.3 guy I'm seeing a guy that can take a bubble screen from the tight end position and turn it into a house call. I'm not saying the guy is a certified home run pick but I don't think there's really a president's for a comparison for this kind of athlete. It's easy to say this doesn't look like Warren or Loveland because we haven't seen guys that fit this profile The closest you might be able to get is Vernon Davis.  He's not as sure far as those guys were but at 19 I think almost everybody is going to have some warts and he's a lottery ticket of could be top 10 in the draft player or could fail I am more of a risk taker I think he fits the athletic profile that could be a homerun, like I said he's almost 40 lb bigger than Cooper and like 4-5 in taller than Cooper so and he's faster. So whatever you think Cooper gives you I think he does that and more. If you want to go with one of the office alignment I can understand that as well but for value as a receiving threat I don't think there's a bigger value at number 19.
×
×
  • Create New...