Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Regrading every first-round QB pick over the last 15 years


Martin
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Varking said:

But this isn’t a normal first overall because they are getting drafted by a team that won 7 games without an NFL QB last year. It’s a solid situation to be drafted in and they aren’t being asked to carry the team like a normal first overall pick. Home run incoming. 

Goff went like 4-12 after the Rams traded up for him. They then hired McVay and went 11-5 or so the next year. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Varking said:

But this isn’t a normal first overall because they are getting drafted by a team that won 7 games without an NFL QB last year. It’s a solid situation to be drafted in and they aren’t being asked to carry the team like a normal first overall pick. Home run incoming. 

Absolutely. Our rookie QB will come to an unusually good situation, which drastically improves the change of success.

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Captain Morgan said:

Final tally

Over the last 15 years, there have been 45 QBs selected in the first round. Here's the final tally:

GRADE TOTAL PERCENT
Home run 11 24%
Mixed result 6 13%
Incomplete 8 18%
Miss 20 44%

Miss

  20

  44%

Miss

  20

  44%

 

 

Whooh-damn GIFs - Get the best GIF on GIPHY

Recalculating based on #1 overall QB picks:

11 total

6 homeruns (Lawrence, Burrow, Luck, Cam, Stafford, Ryan)

1 incomplete (Murray)

3 mixed results (Mayfield, Goff, and Bradford)

1 miss (Winston)

Miss = 1     9%.

All the more reason to trade up for the cream of the crop instead of waiting to see who's left at #9 or trading for someone that another team is getting rid of.

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
  • Flames 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, Varking said:

But this isn’t a normal first overall because they are getting drafted by a team that won 7 games without an NFL QB last year. It’s a solid situation to be drafted in and they aren’t being asked to carry the team like a normal first overall pick. Home run incoming. 

For something like that, you might need to recalculate based on weather teams earned the first overall pick or traded up for it.

(I don't really think that happens all that often though)

But yeah, the truth is that a lot of quarterbacks taken high in the first round are going to teams who are regularly in that position for a reason.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, shaqattaq said:

Recalculating based on #1 overall QB picks:

11 total

6 homeruns (Lawrence, Burrow, Luck, Cam, Stafford, Ryan)

1 incomplete (Murray)

3 mixed results (Mayfield, Goff, and Bradford)

1 miss (Winston)

Miss = 1     9%.

All the more reason to trade up for the cream of the crop instead of waiting to see who's left at #9 or trading for someone that another team is getting rid of.

Nice, thank you for doing that!

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, shaqattaq said:

Recalculating based on #1 overall QB picks:

11 total

6 homeruns (Lawrence, Burrow, Luck, Cam, Stafford, Ryan)

1 incomplete (Murray)

3 mixed results (Mayfield, Goff, and Bradford)

1 miss (Winston)

Miss = 1     9%.

All the more reason to trade up for the cream of the crop instead of waiting to see who's left at #9 or trading for someone that another team is getting rid of.

this. this this. 

You increase your chances with a greater talent pool, idk why ppl don't get this 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, shaqattaq said:

Recalculating based on #1 overall QB picks:

11 total

6 homeruns (Lawrence, Burrow, Luck, Cam, Stafford, Ryan)

1 incomplete (Murray)

3 mixed results (Mayfield, Goff, and Bradford)

1 miss (Winston)

Miss = 1     9%.

All the more reason to trade up for the cream of the crop instead of waiting to see who's left at #9 or trading for someone that another team is getting rid of.

 but even then you are talking 6/11, which is only a little over 50% chance of people a homerun.

Fact is finding a great QB isn't easy, no matter where you pick.  Alse the chance of both Stroud and Young being great is rather slim.  This is why I think it might be somewhat misguided to focus so much on Young's size.  People are acting like both are automatically going to be great so just take the bigger QB.  You have to do to an honest assessment of their chances of being really good.

Do you want the QB that you think has the better chance of being good, but maybe a smaller chance of getting hurt occasionally or the guy you think has less of a chance of being good but maybe less of a chance of getting hurt?

Now if you truly think Stroud has as good of a chance of getting a homerun then of course you take the bigger guy.

 

 

                                                                                   

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...