Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Fitterer on S2 test


NAS
 Share

Recommended Posts

11 hours ago, pantherclaw said:

Where the fug are you looking that you see that?

I'm seeing two rather short, by nfl standard, QBs who used a lot of roll outs, shifting formations and scrambling behind solid college o-lines. We see how that's working for Baker in the league, who was also quite the stud in college. It's going to repeat. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, Fright said:

I'm seeing two rather short, by nfl standard, QBs who used a lot of roll outs, shifting formations and scrambling behind solid college o-lines. We see how that's working for Baker in the league, who was also quite the stud in college. It's going to repeat. 

So you really don't know anything about  Bryce. 

You could have just admitted as much. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I also believe, particularly after Purdy's limited success, a lot of teams are putting a lot of stock into the S2 testing.  I mentioned this jokingly in another thread, but now if I were a top QB prospect, I would never take this test even if I knew I would score well.  Stroud may now very well be the fourth QB taken off the board because of it.  Again, teams who do highly value this test will now look back on Stroud's career, and put more stock into his receivers and O-line (at least one of his tackles will be a first rounder) as being a key to his success at Ohio State.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is pretty obvious that while all of them may have done "Well", Strouds score was definitely the lowest of the 4 QBs or his camp would have addressed it.

We also dont know what well means? is it 80 or higher? 75? We know the other three scored over 90, so Stroud must be in the 80s somewhere going off of context clues. 

Edited by PootieNunu
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, Fright said:

Please enlighten me. 

If you're too lazy to take the time to know somebody you're going to insult, and say we should pass on, the you are an idiot, and there is zero burden of proof on me to provide it to you. I just know if you knew what others knew, you wouldn't be talking out of your ass like you are. 

  • Poo 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, pantherclaw said:

If you're too lazy to take the time to know somebody you're going to insult, and say we should pass on, the you are an idiot, and there is zero burden of proof on me to provide it to you. I just know if you knew what others knew, you wouldn't be talking out of your ass like you are. 

If you knew anything about Stroud, you wouldn't be ego bound to Young. I'm telling YOU his similarities to a trash QB we had starting previously and you can't refute it. Miss me with the burden of proof BS when YOU'RE the one disputing the differences of Mayfield and Young.... Disprove me, "idiot."

  • Beer 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, Ezrider1423 said:

Kidding, obviously.  I just have a man crush on Drake Maye. It will be interesting to see how he does with a new OC and receivers 

If UNC QB Drake Maye doesn't get some serious injury, he is going to make some fortunate NFL team a very, very good QB.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Fright said:

If you knew anything about Stroud, you wouldn't be ego bound to Young. I'm telling YOU his similarities to a trash QB we had starting previously and you can't refute it. Miss me with the burden of proof BS when YOU'RE the one disputing the differences of Mayfield and Young.... Disprove me, "idiot."

Stopped reading after this, because you're making assumptions that are wrong. 

  • Pie 2
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • What?!?!?! Chark's 1,000 yard season was 4 years before he played for us and he only had 525 yards in 15 games as our #1 WR.  Dude has 3,100 yards in 7 seasons, he's the literal definition of a JAG and you think he is better than half our current WR room? T-Mac is literally already better than Chark was at his peak, which again, was years before he ever even put on a Panthers uniform, and there is a real argument to be made that XL and Coker were both better as rookies than Chark was for us in his one season here.
    • Im glad we're starting low. It's nonsensical to put us at 28 IMHO based on objective things IMHO (I think 21-24) is far more appropriate but whatever. Washington was at the bottom last year FWIW.  In 2003, Sports Illustrated said our best chance to win the division was to transfer to the ACC. In 2015, everyone wrote us off as a team that snuck into the playoffs with a losing record in 2014 and lost our best WR in TC (Kelvin Benjamin). All these videos are fodder for conversation, but this prediction has no more validity than saying the Panthers are making the SB bc we're starting the season against the Jaguars again. If Bryce plays like he did down the stretch we will end up the season just fine. This roster is much better than it has been the last 2 seasons. No one knows who any season will ultimately end up, but this team is finally being built in the right way, and the idea that this roster can't compete this year is as insane as being it was when we were gaslit in 2023 that we were a rookie QB from winning the division with that roster.  
    • Im glad we're starting low. It's nonsensical to put us at 28 IMHO based on objective things IMHO (I think 21-24) is far more appropriate but whatever. Washington was at the bottom last year FWIW.  In 2003, Sports Illustrated said our best chance to win the division was to transfer to the ACC. In 2015, everyone wrote us off as a team that snuck into the playoffs with a losing record in 2014 and lost our best WR in TC (Kelvin Benjamin). All these videos are fodder for conversation, but this prediction has no more validity than saying the Panthers are making the SB bc we're starting the season against the Jaguars again. If Bryce plays like he did down the stretch we will end up the season just fine. This roster is much better than it has been the last 2 seasons. No one knows who any season will ultimately end up, but this team is finally being built in the right way, and the idea that this roster can't compete this year is as insane as being it was when we were gaslit in 2023 that we were a rookie QB from winning the division with that roster.  
×
×
  • Create New...