Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Good film breakdown of Young. Good and bad. Film examples


Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, raleigh-panther said:

Good start to 10 mins 32 seconds

bad.  10 mins 32 seconds to end 

I was wrong  about a few things   Not wrong about others 

 

Care to elaborate? 20 minutes of BY film is a lot to digest

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Jacabee said:

It was both literally and figuratively a parade of horribles.

1)  Glut of coaching “talent” with designs that didn’t match the personnel and didn’t mesh with each other.


2) An o-line  I’ll-fitted for the scheme on the interior. Injuries compounded this critical weakness. Penetration on runs completely negated whatever zone dominance we tried to establish. 

3) Lack of separation by the WR’s. A lack of speed and separation and filling the right roles led to some pretty embarrassing looks. We couldn’t win on multiple levels

and it repeatedly trickled

down. Also look to (2) because interior pass rush often limited the time for routes to develop.

4) Rookie qb with an average arm but degenerative mechanics. Those railing about arm strength are off. He can sling it with a solid base, and the time of release is plus.

5) as the season wore on, we saw more bailing on the pocket, more dancing, more tip

toes . Which isn’t that weird given (1)-(3). 
 

Finally, CJ had one of the best seasons ever for a rookie qb and we missed the pick. It has no bearing whatsoever on whether Bryce Young can be a successful NFL QB.

I’ll say this: if the kid does rebound and proves himself, that’s the gamer you want leading your team. 

Solid review 💯...the huddle needs more of this! 🍺 

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

i am anxious to see what he does with this new situation. i think the schedule is about as favorable as you could hope for the first half of the year. i don't expect a dramatic and quick  improvement, but i do expect improvement.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was just about to post this. Great video and it's not too long

+ Some nice throws, especially in the intermediate middle of the field 

+ Ability to extend plays

+ Better than you'd think at scrambling/running

 

- Poor deep ball arm strength, especially while under pressure

- Lot of inaccurate throws otherwise especially outbreaking routes Bryce would commonly overthrow WRs down the field on/near the hashes

- His short stature affects his ball trajectory/field vision when defensive players get close to Bryce and see him loading up to throw 

- Bad at escaping pressure/sacks

- Needs to get better with turnovers/decision making 

 

> Mingo lost a ton of potential yards while open, because Bryce threw him a Ton of uncatchable balls  

> Bryces WRs were near the bottom of the league in WR separation metrics 

> O line was horrendous and played a big role 

 

Screenshot_20240517_085949_YouTube.jpg

  • Pie 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

He probably can't improve his arm strength for throwing over pressure, the video creator  mentioned bryces inability to throw over pressure multiple times. That kinda stuck out to me.

If his ideal comp is like a Tua 2.0 then they're definitely gonna have to get some really good players around him. And you better hope Canales is the next coming of Mike McDaniels 

  • Beer 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Hoenheim said:

And you better hope Canales is the next coming of Mike McDaniels 

Honestly, irrespective of Bryce, this is my hope for Canales.

I hate hearing about him being a "QB whisperer." Because I don't give a rat's ass about him saving Bryce's career. Bryce either proves to be worth what we gave up for him, or it's next man up.

I'm just excited to have a young, innovative offensive mind.

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Captroop said:

Honestly, irrespective of Bryce, this is my hope for Canales.

I hate hearing about him being a "QB whisperer." Because I don't give a rat's ass about him saving Bryce's career. Bryce either proves to be worth what we gave up for him, or it's next man up.

I'm just excited to have a young, innovative offensive mind.

How did this “innovative” narrative start with Canales? Just because he’s young?

He truly wants to run the ball and nothing Tampa did last year was all that creative. Mike Evans ability to win 1 on 1 does wonders for an offense as a whole 

  • Pie 2
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Did they mention anything about some players and most every coach not giving a flying fug and seemingly just going through the motions. So many of our players and coaches needed to shown the door last season and glad many were. I expect to definitely see improvement from Bryce this season and hoping this is the case. New coach appears to actually give a fug and we got rid of some of our "I was going through the motions and playing to not get injured" guys like Brian Burns who was like dead weight. Ridding ourselves of that dead weight didnt give tow shits coach Frank Reich should really help as well as hoping for a much better O-Line and receivers that can get open with an entire different scheme that doe snot look like a middle school offense.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, *FreeFua* said:

How did this “innovative” narrative start with Canales? Just because he’s young?

He truly wants to run the ball and nothing Tampa did last year was all that creative. Mike Evans ability to win 1 on 1 does wonders for an offense as a whole 

He's hot

  • Pie 1
  • The D 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The lines dictate the game. Always.  Defense: control the LOS and pressure the QB Offense: control the LOS and prevent pressure on the QB
    • Trevor Lawrence, Baker Mayfield, Zach Wilson and Sam Darnold are not clutch QBs. They will need defense and great game management to win consistently during the season. They are done in the playoffs when the defense and coaching can't carry the game. Don't waste time or money on them. They'll be the end of great coaching and defense in the playoffs following a strong running game during the season. Geno Smith is clutch and can contend for a championship game in the playoffs.
    • Amazes me anyone would say he's not clutch. 30.4% GWD conversion is lower level clutch like Derek Carr and Aaron Rodgers. Andy Dalton is 26.4%. Baker Mayfield is 17.5% and Sam Darnold is 12.5%. Bryce Young is 11.1%. People need to realize QB must be 60% clutch and 40% game manager in an NFL game. A couple of my QB targets are Cooper Rush at 75.0% and Desmond Ridder at 35.7%. Desmond Ridder had crazy clutch ratios like Tom Brady in their college careers. Ridder needs a coach like Canales. SB dynasty QBs are around 40% & clutch playoff QBs who make it to championship games are around 30% as a gauge. When you run this across the 64 championship QBs over the past 35 seasons you'll see the same result with a 3% to 5% swing from the start to finish of their career. This goes for the undervalued championship QBs like Case Keenum and Erik Kramer too. QBs come prepared from college knowing how to be a clutch performer. It's only the game management and system they need to be coached up on in the NFL.
×
×
  • Create New...