Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

2024 College Football Thread

KingKucci

By KingKucci,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

HPPantherzfan Proficient

HPPantherzfan

Posted
Posted (edited)
4 minutes ago, jayboogieman said:

I don't have a dog in the fight, but he has a point when it comes to football. Duke is a basketball school.

So is Carolina but we talk about their football.  Tell me, what’s the difference?

And I would like to add, Carolina football loses like this with 4 and 5  star recruits.  

Edited by HPPantherzfan
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
LinvilleGorge Grand Master

LinvilleGorge

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, HPPantherzfan said:

So is Carolina but we talk about their football.  Tell me, what’s the difference?

And I would like to add, Carolina football loses like this with 4 and 5  star recruits.  

UNC is a North Carolina school. By law 82% of freshmen have to be from NC. A whopping 15% of duke students are from NC.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
HPPantherzfan Proficient

HPPantherzfan

Posted
Posted (edited)
6 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

UNC is a North Carolina school. By law 82% of freshmen have to be from NC. A whopping 15% of duke students are from NC.

And what does that have to do with the fact your football program sucks as bad as Dukes?  Actually, last couple of years Duke has been better.  Fun fact, did you know when they were first thinking of building the Asheboro Zoo, a Carolina alum, NC general assembly member and NC senate member said to just put a fence around Carolina?  True fact, he said it to the zoning board

Edited by HPPantherzfan
Link to comment
Share on other sites
LinvilleGorge Grand Master

LinvilleGorge

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, HPPantherzfan said:

And what does that have to do with the fact your football program sucks as bad as Dukes?  Actually, last couple of years Duke has been better.  Fun fact, did you know when they were first thinking off the Asheboro Zoo, a Carolina alum, NC general assembly member and NC senate member said to just put a fence around Carolina?  True fact, he said it to the zoning board

I'm just saying that's probably a big part of why so many more people talk about UNC on here and in the state of NC in general. UNC has MUCH deeper roots in the state. UNC is a NC institution. Duke just happens to have an ugly campus in a shitty town that happens to be surrounded by the state of NC.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • CRA
      Post- Training Camp 53-Man Roster Projection

      By CRA · Posted

      This is about getting open and YAC....and the QB we have.  You basically are just highlighting average depth when targeted vs 2 players. .  And yeah, I often say AT is a small slow reliable TE in terms of what he does for us.   That's what he is.   I think a couple of you want to make this into a Renfrow argument.   I'm a Renfrow fan.  Renfrow does not check the box of what a BY O needs either at the slot.  Renfrow just a niche roleplayer at this level.  it's easy to look up how horrific AT is with the ball in his hands and in terms of getting open.....and it's also easy to look up what a low ceiling of an offense the steady AT diet produces w/ BY. 
    • PNW_PantherMan
      Panthers' content round up

      By PNW_PantherMan · Posted

      The one time he's actively tried to lose was the best we've ever done.
    • CRA
      Post- Training Camp 53-Man Roster Projection

      By CRA · Posted

      I simply acknowledge BY is the QB.  And just like we did when we drafted him.....the type O you would need to setup around him for success was always pretty simple.  But we have done virtually the opposite.  XL dropping some passes isn't why we were ranked the 32nd O and 30th passing the past 2 years.  *Ricky Prohel was brought up only in regards to role function he served on the team.  Niche/specialist.   He wasn't eating up the snaps in the O.    AT should have a similar snap %. People could MAUL Ricky Prohel and put hands all over him.   We got to the Super Bowl in part because we were mauling guys (our slot CB).   You can't do that now.  AT has a MUCH easier life and still can't get open.  Or run.    If you live in 3 WR sets, with a weak armed QB, and you choose to put someone who can't get open or run in the slot.......well, your are going to have a weak pass O.  That's by design IMO.  
×
×
  • Create New...