Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

2024 College Football Thread


KingKucci
 Share

Recommended Posts

9 minutes ago, Shocker said:

He looks like a top 5 guy for sure from what I have seen.  Very impressive.  Size speed hands looks to have it all

Just saw The Athletic's latest mock has T-Mac going #6 and then we take Burden at #7

I honestly think I'd cry if he gets taken one pick before us and then we also end up taking a WR as well, worst case scenario.  And I thought I was mad when Sewell got taken by the Lions one pick before us a few years back, this would dwarf that feeling if it happened, haha

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Proudiddy said:

So after hearing all the Cam Ward hype, I went and looked uo highlights last week and passed the eye test, big time.  I thought, "we might have something."  So I was intent in watching the game tonight to see what kind of impression he'd make...  and ooowee mayne...  I'm out.  🤣

He has an NFL arm but I’m not sure if he will succeed in the NFL.  Seems too raw to be drafted really early and play immediately.  I really don’t like how he gets rid of the ball at any cost while being sacked.  Most of the time that’s not worth it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, PNW_PantherMan said:

He has an NFL arm but I’m not sure if he will succeed in the NFL.  Seems too raw to be drafted really early and play immediately.  I really don’t like how he gets rid of the ball at any cost while being sacked.  Most of the time that’s not worth it.

I was thinking he was just having a rough night even if I was unimpressed for most of the game, but then when he ran all the way to the eight sideline and then threw uo what was essentially a punt back to the far left, which I believe they ran back for a pick 6...  bro, that's a fuging peewee level mistake.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Proudiddy said:

So after hearing all the Cam Ward hype, I went and looked uo highlights last week and passed the eye test, big time.  I thought, "we might have something."  So I was intent in watching the game tonight to see what kind of impression he'd make...  and ooowee mayne...  I'm out.  🤣

  You left to early. Three late tds to come back from a 20 point deficit.  Ward had his best game of the year.

Edited by Davidson Deac II
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yep. I was hoping for and calling for a day three guy. But I didn’t research the position to say if we should or should‘t have jumped at a particular guy at a particular spot.    And everything I read said it was a poor draft for RBs depth wise. I guess when Seattle takes a backup RB in the 1st, that kind of backs that up.    I definitely think we should keep 4 running backs and if King can play well enough then keep him too.    I believe I heard Canales say we are a running team (talking about drafting a WR he will be needing to block as well as catch). Well if we are gonna be a running team by identity we don’t need to stock the WR room to overflowing. If one room has to sacrifice, it should not be the RB room given our circumstances. 
    • If there's a pattern I'm definitely picking up from Dan and company is a philosophy of making trades where we try not to sacrifice the number of draft picks we have by day's end. In other words, we're not giving up three picks for one, or giving up a future pick to make a pick today. And even if we give up something at the start, we make trades later to make up for that initial loss. Here's how it stacked up for 2026: How we started: 19, 51, 83, 119, 158, 159, 200 How we ended: 19, 49, 83, 129, 144, 151, 227 (no future picks sacrificed) Ultimately, we moved up two spots in the second to ensure we got someone we coveted, gave up a few spots for our fourth round pick, but then had better picks in the 5th (and got really good value out of them), and had a worse 7th rounder which isn't that big of a loss anyways.  At this point, we can question who they draft, but they're pretty good maneuvering across the draft board.
    • I just saw the funniest thing...or very disappointing, depending how you handle misery. A guy on YouTube did a 2027 'way too early' mock draft.  If I told you the simulator has the Panthers selecting in the top 10 , what would you say?  If I told you it was pick #8 and only two QBs were taken in the top 7, what would you say?  If I told you this dude had us taking a defensive player, what would you say?
×
×
  • Create New...