Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

2024 College Football Thread


KingKucci
 Share

Recommended Posts

10 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Miami is a pretty mediocre P5 team carried by a #1 overall pick type of QB. Subtract Cam Ward and replace him with Average Joe P5 QB and they have 3 or 4 losses.

So basically what Maye was with Carolina?

 

The ACC in general is a joke. SMU is the newcomer and they might be the best team in the conference.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Miami is a pretty mediocre P5 team carried by a #1 overall pick type of QB. Subtract Cam Ward and replace him with Average Joe P5 QB and they have 3 or 4 losses.

So basically what Maye was with Carolina?

 

The ACC in general is a joke. SMU is the newcomer and they might be the best team in the conference.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

So basically what Maye was with Carolina?

 

The ACC in general is a joke. SMU is the newcomer and they might be the best team in the conference.

Yep. I've been saying all year that Miami is reminiscent of the Howell and Maye Heels teams. Their D sucks but it doesn't suck THAT bad though.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, CRA said:

If you don’t punish teams for losing in a title game then how would you keep Miami out if they win this weekend and then lose to SMU?   They would have to get an at large in that scenario. 
 

Because people have been brainwashed, like yourself, into thinking that the ACC is a joke conference. 

They'll definitely put 4 SEC and 4 BIG10 teams in. You're then looking at the ACC Champion, the other Conference Champion and then it's a toss up for those final 2 spots. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Miami is a pretty mediocre P5 team carried by a #1 overall pick type of QB. Subtract Cam Ward and replace him with Average Joe P5 QB and they have 3 or 4 losses.

There's a lot of Sunday players on that pretty mediocre P4 team, but I respect that you keep banging that drum. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, CRA said:

You have a very good QB.   

and I have been very consistent about knocking Miami for their ACC play.  And Miami definitely got some ref aid along the way. 

VT was up in the 4th 

Cal was up in the 4th 

Lou tied in the 4th

Duke 1 pt game in the 4th 

Loss to GT

Wake 6 pt game in the 4th

but in a neutral site…I’m not sure they are even favored vs the #2 or #3 teams in the ACC.  Because of all the other dudes not named Ward. 

So is a game not 60 minutes long?

We're being criticised now for pulling away in the 4Q? Why were Alabama / Georgia et al in their pomp not punished for that?

If you can point out the refereeing decisions that went in our favour I'd be much appreciated (and you can miss me with the clear non-catch against VT on a Hail Mary). 

Ward was a 5th round pick coming into this year. I think a few of you are going to be surprised what he actually does in the NFL - I love what he's done at Miami, but a great deal of what he's been able to achieve is because he's surrounded by very, very good players. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I mean, the ACC is definitely nowhere near as strong as the SEC and Big 10. That's just reality.

For the last 20 years the SEC has had a couple of elite teams and a lot of guys making up the numbers. They don't have any elite teams this year.

The BIG10 has had OSU and occasionally Michigan. Nebraska ain't scarin' anybody. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, OldhamA said:

For the last 20 years the SEC has had a couple of elite teams and a lot of guys making up the numbers. They don't have any elite teams this year.

The BIG10 has had OSU and occasionally Michigan. Nebraska ain't scarin' anybody. 

I'm not talking about the last 20 years. I'm talking about right now. Today.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Circle back when you get thumped by three scores by a top 5 type of team in the playoffs.

I've never said we're going to win the National Championship. We're in the third part of this cycle, it's just been accelerated slightly by dropping a good QB into the mix:

  • Lose Big
  • Lose Small
  • Win Small
  • Win Big 
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, OldhamA said:

Because people have been brainwashed, like yourself, into thinking that the ACC is a joke conference. 

They'll definitely put 4 SEC and 4 BIG10 teams in. You're then looking at the ACC Champion, the other Conference Champion and then it's a toss up for those final 2 spots. 

Um…ok.

so lets say Miami likely is #6 this week. They beat Syracuse.  So let’s say are at worst going into title game as #6…..and then you said the committee won’t punish teams for losing….so I still don’t square how they would keep Miami out if they lost and aren’t punished for losing.  

I’m a Clemson guy.  I don’t think the ACC is a joke but they aren’t the SEC.  If the past decade another team had stepped up with Clemson they would have been the BIG10

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CRA said:

Um…ok.

so lets say Miami likely is #6 this week. They beat Syracuse.  So let’s say are at worst going into title game as #6…..and then you said the committee won’t punish teams for losing….so I still don’t square how they would keep Miami out if they lost and aren’t punished for losing.  

I’m a Clemson guy.  I don’t think the ACC is a joke but they aren’t the SEC.  If the past decade another team had stepped up with Clemson they would have been the BIG10

What the Playoff Committee says they're going to do and what they actually do are almost certainly wildly different thigs. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Call me crazy but if you’re in the bottom 7 in efficiency using Zone 84% of the time why not try something else? You paid Jaycee top 5 CB money use him more effectively. Zone is only efficient if you can generate a good pass rush to force a QB into mistakes otherwise you will get picked apart
    • Good Lord this board has become a cesspool of negativity and where fandom becomes something twisted and unrecognizable.  
    • Yeah, I could jump right into the unbelievable Bryce debate now that some people are trying to flip the script because Bryce Young has, at most, a handful of decent games as a pro, but that's going to work itself out. Suffice it to say that I've seen better QBs (with an s) in a Panthers uniform, and I've certainly seen better QBs be drafted while we're playing around with Bryce, one of them who beat the crap out of us already this season... Let's forget about Bryce (and his markedly underwhelming play since he's been here); I think that most sane fans will agree that drafting him was an error, but it happens. Sure, it doesn't happen to the tune of King's ransom---including your main receiver---but it happens. You bet, you lose. Speaking of receivers...and betting and losing... Oh, man, we drafted Xavier Legette. Yes, just like with Bryce, I've entered "the dark side." Some Huddlers were telling us from the beginning, and they were right. But, I'm not apologizing for waiting to see what a guy's got before making my decision on him. X was a one-year wonder at South Carolina who parlayed some really nice production that season, a great personality and thick country accent, into becoming a first round pick (but only in Carolina). For Dan Morgan and company, He was a big swing that has turned into a big whiff (and I can still feel the ill breeze from that one). Sh¡t happens, right? Well, not so fast. Ladd McConkey was the decidedly more polished receiver who was literally ready to hit the ground running as soon as stepping onto the field as a pro. Ladd was never the biggest guy (though not the smallest), but he was the guy that could run routes, always seemed to get open---no question---and had the same speed as X, but with legit quickness and nuanced shake and bake. But Dan chose the project. He chose the guy where the game speed looks more like a tractor trailer than a 5.0 mustang. Look, I've supported X (just like Bryce) many many a day, but no more. Now I'm not saying that I won't root for the guy. Just like with Bryce, he seems like a great kid. But as far as giving excuses for the kid, and, perhaps more importantly, waiting for some miraculous breakout, I'm done with that. I've seen enough. You don't draft a project for a project. And yes, Bryce had proven to be a project after his first season. In my mind, drafting a supposedly number one receiver that needs lots of development for a starting quarterback that needs immediate help to try and further his development is not going to lead to good things. Pick the surest guy. Or at least pick the one who appears to be the surest guy, because picking can be tricky... especially when you're too busy tricking yourself. 
×
×
  • Create New...