Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

2024 College Football Thread


KingKucci
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Yeah, Colorado vs. Bama wouldn't have been competitve. Colorado vs. BYU gives us the presumed conference championship game that just didn't materialize.

Yeah Colorado would have blew them out. The NCAA was scared Deion would embarrass an SEC team on Nat'l tv.

 

Nobody fears Milroe as a passer lol

 

Didn't Vanderbilt beat Alabama?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, CRA said:

I'm going to go ahead and call my upset pick right now. 

Notre Dame drops to 0-3 all time in the CFP

Notre Dame has been overrated forever. Not sure how that school is still a big deal. The owner of NBC must have strong ties to that program. It's the only reason they stay relevant.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

Yeah Colorado would have blew them out. The NCAA was scared Deion would embarrass an SEC team on Nat'l tv.

Nobody fears Milroe as a passer lol

Didn't Vanderbilt beat Alabama?

The whole drop back 50 times and sprinkle in 8 random run plays while Sanders holds the ball against Big12 athletes....isn't going to fly against a good SEC front. 

the comment has nothing to do with Milroe. 

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ncfan said:

Poor BB he got ran out of the NFL. Usually if a team was interested they would have at least reached out now.

 

Sadly this may be his only opportunity to coach again. At least we will be the center of attention in college football next season.

 

Cmon Linville let's get excited for the circus!

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, PNW_PantherMan said:

Texas is going all the way.  They got the rest of the bracket right where they want them after losing to Georgia

one thing is clear, format screwed the #1 team. 

I got no confidence to say any team is going all the way.   Can't trust any of them.  They all can have a bad day and lose.  I guess if I had to put a nickel on predicting a team making the Championship game I might go w/ UGA making that game. 

what hurts Texas is just the math of football.  They got to stay healthy enough and play good enough to pull off 4 straight wins to win it all.  That's where things get dicey w/ this 12 team format.   Health.  Making a 4 game run vs different degrees of good to get the natty is tough sledding. 

who knows, it will be interesting to see the 12 team format play out.    

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, CRA said:

what hurts Texas is just the math of football.  They got to stay healthy enough and play good enough to pull of 4 straight wins to win it all. 

I've seen enough after they beat the Aggies at College Station.  Everything went against them that game and they still won.  They are huge in the trenches.  Georgia won't be able to beat them 3 times.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, PNW_PantherMan said:

I've seen enough after they beat the Aggies at College Station.  Everything went against them that game and they still won.  They are huge in the trenches.  Georgia won't be able to beat them 3 times.

maybe.  Texas did have a bad day....but were lucky to have a bad vs another team also having a bad day.  A&M didn't muster a single offensive point that game.  Not even a FG.  

To me, I don't think a single team in this playoff can have a bad day vs an opponent having a good day.  And the CFP has generally had teams that could navigate those days.   

maybe I will end up liking the 12 team format.  I think the format clearly works against the better teams though.  Let's say it runs chalk to the final 4.  Odds are you still end up w/ someone getting beat up by the time they get to the final 4.... and that team might of been FSU'd had it been known. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, CRA said:

maybe I will end up liking the 12 team format.  I think the format clearly works against the better teams though.  Let's say it runs chalk to the final 4.  Odds are you still end up w/ someone getting beat up by the time they get to the final 4.... and that team might of been FSU'd had it been known. 

That's comes with the more teams you let in.  MLB has seen similar issues with their latest format.  The Dodgers won this year with the bye, but most of the teams that had the bye have done terrible.  And wild card teams have overperformed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, CRA said:

The whole drop back 50 times and sprinkle in 8 random run plays while Sanders holds the ball against Big12 athletes....isn't going to fly against a good SEC front. 

the comment has nothing to do with Milroe. 

 

Bama would've probably thrown under 20 times because they would've just been cramming the ball down Colorado's throat on the ground anyway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Call me crazy but if you’re in the bottom 7 in efficiency using Zone 84% of the time why not try something else? You paid Jaycee top 5 CB money use him more effectively. Zone is only efficient if you can generate a good pass rush to force a QB into mistakes otherwise you will get picked apart
    • Good Lord this board has become a cesspool of negativity and where fandom becomes something twisted and unrecognizable.  
    • Yeah, I could jump right into the unbelievable Bryce debate now that some people are trying to flip the script because Bryce Young has, at most, a handful of decent games as a pro, but that's going to work itself out. Suffice it to say that I've seen better QBs (with an s) in a Panthers uniform, and I've certainly seen better QBs be drafted while we're playing around with Bryce, one of them who beat the crap out of us already this season... Let's forget about Bryce (and his markedly underwhelming play since he's been here); I think that most sane fans will agree that drafting him was an error, but it happens. Sure, it doesn't happen to the tune of King's ransom---including your main receiver---but it happens. You bet, you lose. Speaking of receivers...and betting and losing... Oh, man, we drafted Xavier Legette. Yes, just like with Bryce, I've entered "the dark side." Some Huddlers were telling us from the beginning, and they were right. But, I'm not apologizing for waiting to see what a guy's got before making my decision on him. X was a one-year wonder at South Carolina who parlayed some really nice production that season, a great personality and thick country accent, into becoming a first round pick (but only in Carolina). For Dan Morgan and company, He was a big swing that has turned into a big whiff (and I can still feel the ill breeze from that one). Sh¡t happens, right? Well, not so fast. Ladd McConkey was the decidedly more polished receiver who was literally ready to hit the ground running as soon as stepping onto the field as a pro. Ladd was never the biggest guy (though not the smallest), but he was the guy that could run routes, always seemed to get open---no question---and had the same speed as X, but with legit quickness and nuanced shake and bake. But Dan chose the project. He chose the guy where the game speed looks more like a tractor trailer than a 5.0 mustang. Look, I've supported X (just like Bryce) many many a day, but no more. Now I'm not saying that I won't root for the guy. Just like with Bryce, he seems like a great kid. But as far as giving excuses for the kid, and, perhaps more importantly, waiting for some miraculous breakout, I'm done with that. I've seen enough. You don't draft a project for a project. And yes, Bryce had proven to be a project after his first season. In my mind, drafting a supposedly number one receiver that needs lots of development for a starting quarterback that needs immediate help to try and further his development is not going to lead to good things. Pick the surest guy. Or at least pick the one who appears to be the surest guy, because picking can be tricky... especially when you're too busy tricking yourself. 
×
×
  • Create New...