Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

2024 College Football Thread


KingKucci
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

The FG did nothing they still need 2 TDs.

 

It's a 2 score game at worst. The FG still left them with a 2 score game. They playing conservative in a must win situation. I don't get it.

They're just trying to get into the locker room with the score manageable. They need something positive. They had a decent drive finally. Go for it and come up empty and it's like a kick in the balls. Your team is already reeling. You got a just get something positive. Now if you can get this stop here you have a chance to reply turn the momentum tide going into half time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

They're just trying to get into the locker room with the score manageable. They need something positive. They had a decent drive finally. Go for it and come up empty and it's like a kick in the balls. Your team is already reeling. You got a just get something positive. Now if you can get this stop here you have a chance to reply turn the momentum tide going into half time.

And just like that still a 2 TD game. Conservative coaching with a lesser team is just asking to lose this game. It is what it is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, CamWhoaaCam said:

And just like that still a 2 TD game. Conservative coaching with a lesser team is just asking to lose this game. It is what it is.

Yeah, because going for it on 4th and 4 would totally change the fact that ND is just head and shoulders better. Probably the only difference would be that IU would have a goose egg on the scoreboard.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, PNW_PantherMan said:

Irish are gonna blow the top off in the 2nd half. 

I hope so. The IU HC out here taking timeouts second guessing himself as if he has the talent on defense to keep this game close. Clearly a talent gap you have to coach aggressive there is no tomorrow for Indiana. If you get blown out being aggressive at least you went down swinging.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

I hope so. The IU HC out here taking timeouts second guessing himself as if he has the talent on defense to keep this game close. Clearly a talent gap you have to coach aggressive there is no tomorrow for Indiana. If you get blown out being aggressive at least you went down swinging.

 

 

I like how you just ignore that the result of them being aggressive on their first redzone trip was their shaky QB throwing a bad INT.

If their sixth year QB wasn't playing like a shook freshman backup unexpectedly forced into action they might be able to compete.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • A 2 year deal for Coker would be terribly short sighted as I pointed out in another thread the other day. T-Mac will be eligible for an extension after 2 more seasons, and while there is still 2 years to go, he's very much looked like the type of player you extend right away, knowing waiting will only cost more money and take longer before the contract becomes a bargain with rising contracts every year. So if we sign Coker to a 2 year extension, that means we either let Coker walk after those 2 years or we don't extend T-Mac when we should, as I can't see signing both in the same off season much of an option, it was terrible for the Bengals this year. I like doing a 1 year deal for Coker to set his market value with a full season as the #2, and then sign him to a 3 or 4 year deal after that, which also separates Coker and T-Mac's contract years to help keep both around instead of having to choose at some point, like the Bengals should have done. I also think coming to an agreement on a multi year deal right now could be tough, the team will want to pay the rate of his actual production so far and his agent will want to be paid on his potential from his few breakout games, everyone might just be too far apart for a multi year deal.
    • I would love Sonny Styles!.   I don’t think he slips that far.   Get the best OT available at 19.  There is a good chance icky will miss next year and then come back and may switch to guard.
    • Then they will have to depend on rookie tackles for awhile. They've got about 1 more good season in Moton and who knows if Ikey will ever return full strength. Better start drafting at 1 on day 2 at least. I personally would prefer a 1st round LT myself but I will take what I can get. 
×
×
  • Create New...