Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

2024 College Football Thread


KingKucci
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, SCMunnerlyn1 said:

No they quite literally were passed over for 2 slap dicks from the ACC. Warde Manuel said himself " data points" 

That fat fug.is still mad Clowney killed his running back in the bowl game. 

Yeah, again,  they literally weren’t passed over for 2 ACC teams.   Clemson were the ACC champs.   That’s like saying they the CFP committee opted to put in Boise State and ASU in over SC.  

They picked SMU over you.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CRA said:

Yeah, again,  they literally weren’t passed over for 2 ACC teams.   Clemson were the ACC champs.   That’s like saying they the CFP committee opted to put in Boise State and ASU in over SC.  

They picked SMU over you.   

Atlantic Coastal Cookies

 

You can't have more than 1 cookie out of the conference. Clemson deserved to be there as the champs. SMU had no business being in the picture. Alabama was screwed over for a cookie.

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, SCMunnerlyn1 said:

and I'm saying with my whole chest they would walk in and roll over half the teams in the playoffs. Since realistically speaking Clemson is 0-3 vs the SEC and they still put them in. 

SC finds a way to BARELY sneak past Clemson, who doesn’t play defense anymore….now suddenly you think SC is King Kong? 

SC wasn’t going to go into Texas and do anything different.  Score less points.  Allow less points.  Result would have been the same most likely.  So realistically, SC would have had 4 SEC losses on the year, 

could they of put an SEC in over SMU? Maybe.  But it’s probably not yall.  It’s Bama.  

And SC clearly doesn’t have the O to be a legit threat in  a college football playoff this year.  There is no great tragedy. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

Atlantic Coastal Cookies

 

You can't have more than 1 cookie out of the conference. Clemson deserved to be there as the champs. SMU had no business being in the picture. Alabama was screwed over for a cookie.

Alabama has two bad losses on their record. The only entity that screwed over Alabama was Alabama.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, SCMunnerlyn1 said:

I agree Tenn and Texas both got easy schedules 

 

with these super conferences they need a way to force a play in towards the end. 

The 12 team format is a play in. Arguing that one team would be #12 over another is just semantics as both would get stomped. It is about finding the best team, not which of four is most deserving of being #12

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, CRA said:

SC finds a way to BARELY sneak past Clemson, who doesn’t play defense anymore….now suddenly you think SC is King Kong? 

SC wasn’t going to go into Texas and do anything different.  Score less points.  Allow less points.  Result would have been the same most likely.  So realistically, SC would have had 4 SEC losses on the year, 

could they of put an SEC in over SMU? Maybe.  But it’s probably not yall.  It’s Bama.  

And SC clearly doesn’t have the O to be a legit threat in  a college football playoff this year.  There is no great tragedy. 

Maybe go back and watch the Clem game again. Costly turnovers in the redzone by both teams. Easily could have been a 34-24 type of deal if both teams dont do that stuff. 

I never said they were king kong. Only that they are flat out one of the top 12 best and thats a fact. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, CRA said:

Yeah, again,  they literally weren’t passed over for 2 ACC teams.   Clemson were the ACC champs.   That’s like saying they the CFP committee opted to put in Boise State and ASU in over SC.  

They picked SMU over you.   

SC won the ACC title the week before in Clemsons own house. Committee was worried about optics over talent. 

I've been pounding the drum that Beamer is a weenie since the Clemson game because he refused to lobby as a 10 win team and call refs out and eat a fine. 

Then proceeded to say he was friends with Dabo before being thrown under the bus right after the ACC title game when his "friend" said "herr derr SMU better be in the playoffs herr derr" 

Beamer always takes the high road and thats why his team is sitting at home. 

Edited by SCMunnerlyn1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, LinvilleGorge said:

LOLOLOLOL

Laugh if you want. Entire chest. Nobody wants a piece right now.
Got to watch our red headed step child and their door mat get beat like a rented mule and we have to watch the opt out bowl vs Illinois which by the way we were hand picked for meaning they thought we were better than both Ole Miss and Bama. So at least one committee knows ball. 

The best 12 teams didnt make the playoff and Greg Sankey got played like a fiddle by that committee and he could have avoided all of that simply by not trying to influence the outcome of games in his own conference. 

Should be fired high key.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, SCMunnerlyn1 said:

Laugh if you want. Entire chest. Nobody wants a piece right now.
Got to watch our red headed step child and their door mat get beat like a rented mule and we have to watch the opt out bowl vs Illinois which by the way we were hand picked for meaning they thought we were better than both Ole Miss and Bama. So at least one committee knows ball. 

The best 12 teams didnt make the playoff and Greg Sankey got played like a fiddle by that committee and he could have avoided all of that simply by not trying to influence the outcome of games in his own conference. 

Should be fired high key.

Enjoy your also ran bowl with the rest of us undeserving peasants.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In 2025 Sam Darnold had over 1k more passing yards than Bryce Young on 1 less pass attempt. Repeat that to yourself several times and let it sink in. I absolutely love it when people come on here and invoke Sam Darnold like some gotcha. Darnold is the physical prototype for what anyone needs in a franchise QB. All the physical tools. Few people thought he would put it all together on the mental side of the position. He used to make some of the worst decisions you would ever see. At times in the past he made up for that with absurd throws and athleticism. But make no mistake whatsoever no matter how you feel about our starting QB. Bryce Young is a completely opposite conundrum. He lacks virtually any and all physical tools and athleticism and his elite processing is really mediocre at best on a good day and horrific on a bad day. These are realities people should have already been addressing instead of quadrupling down in year four.
    • The nice thing about the timing of Bryce's contract at least is that it's going to match up with the 2027 Draft Class. No excuses, he either becomes Rams 2nd half Bryce year long, or we draft his replacement.  Nothing wrong with carrying Bryce on his 5th year expiring and a 1st round rookie waiting in the wings. Let the rookie sit until the trade deadline, deal Bryce to a needy team at the time, profit. 
    • Yeah they were bad QBs - but QB's that stayed on their teams for several years.  BY is better than all of those. 
×
×
  • Create New...