Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

2024 College Football Thread


KingKucci
 Share

Recommended Posts

Skattebo is struggling as much vs Texas as Jeanty was struggling against PSU last night. Yikes.

 

I don't think it's an incitement on their talent at RB. I think it just doesn't matter how good of a RB you are if your offensive line is alot less talented than the dline they are going against. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, SCMunnerlyn1 said:

We've gotta quit thumping this narrative as factual given who did or didnt suit up. Thats the reality of non CFP bowl season. Portal,Coaches gone, players not playing or quitting mid game. 

It's just not realistic. If you cheer for a conference knock yourself out. But what a team did week 1-12 has maybe even less than zero to do with a bowl game. 

The "factual" thing is those teams lost those games. The emotional thing is the "players didn’t play, transfer portal, etc."

That has nothing to do with what actually happened.

Remember the FSU "We WeRe ThE rEaL nAtIoNaL cHaMpS!!" horseshit? How did that end up working out for them?

If you spend your time crying and making excuses, what message does that team get from you as a coach?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

That's right, I forgot you guys actually made it and got beat pretty soundly by Texas.

I mean, Clemson O lit Texas D up with a WR forced to play RB.  Did things to the vaunted Texas D no one else has come close to. 

7 point game in the 4th at one point.  

I mean if that is soundly beating the 12 seed….we view football games different.  Clemson in theory SHOULD have been the team to get beat the worst given the seeding.  

still can’t believe we got folks upset about teams that didn’t make it in over the ACC champ lol.  Clemson is the last place to go looking for why someone else should of got in

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CRA said:

I mean, Clemson O lit Texas D up with a WR forced to play RB.  Did things to the vaunted Texas D no one else has come close to. 

7 point game in the 4th at one point.  

I mean if that is soundly beating the 12 seed….we view football games different.  Clemson in theory SHOULD have been the team to get beat the worst given the seeding.  

I am sure you feel that way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, kungfoodude said:

The "factual" thing is those teams lost those games. The emotional thing is the "players didn’t play, transfer portal, etc."

That has nothing to do with what actually happened.

Remember the FSU "We WeRe ThE rEaL nAtIoNaL cHaMpS!!" horseshit? How did that end up working out for them?

If you spend your time crying and making excuses, what message does that team get from you as a coach?

I legit felt bad for FSU last year. Sucks their QB got hurt and honestly they did earn the right to be in the playoffs but unfortunately given the old format I think the selection committee did the right thing because everyone knew they weren't one of the four best teams without Travis. That's the type of stuff that the 12 team field fixes.

But yeah, you wonder how much the whine fest and woe is woe is me bullshit they did from last year factored into the suck fest that happened this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Hoenheim said:

Skattebo is struggling as much vs Texas as Jeanty was struggling against PSU last night. Yikes.

 

I don't think it's an incitement on their talent at RB. I think it just doesn't matter how good of a RB you are if your offensive line is alot less talented than the dline they are going against. 

 

Arizona State is the biggest paper tiger in the playoff. I looked at who they played and the scores, and knew Texas was going to absolutely DOG DICK them. It’s going to end 45-10. They don’t have a chance. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

I am sure you feel that way.

I mean what they uniquely did to the vaunted Texas D is just a fact.  Not a feeling. 

it’s also a fact they were the ACC champs and had nothing to do with who did and didn’t get an at large entry.  It’s also a fact no one can be upset about them getting overseeded.  So, it’s again, just the wrong team to be upset about.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I legit felt bad for FSU last year. Sucks their QB got hurt and honestly they did earn the right to be in the playoffs but unfortunately given the old format I think the selection committee did the right thing because everyone knew they weren't one of the four best teams without Travis. That's the type of stuff that the 12 team field fixes.

But yeah, you wonder how much the whine fest and woe is woe is me bullshit they did from last year factored into the suck fest that happened this year.

I didn’t feel bad at all for them. They had no business being near the playoffs at all.

I very much am enjoying their fall and hope it continues for years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, kungfoodude said:

I didn’t feel bad at all for them. They had no business being near the playoffs at all.

I very much am enjoying their fall and hope it continues for years.

I don't let my hatred of programs bleed into enjoying watching kids get screwed over because of a devastating late season injury to their key player. I feel bad for the kids. fug the program.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, LinvilleGorge said:

I don't let my hatred of programs bleed into enjoying watching kids get screwed over because of a devastating late season injury to their key player. I feel bad for the kids. fug the program.

It wasn't getting screwed over even remotely. They had no business being anywhere near the playoffs last year with or without Travis. The ACC was historically bad. They genuinely didn't deserve it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It seems the needs for the Panthers are at positions that tend to require intelligence to lift others--going from "good to great"--FS, ILB, and C--as you say. While i like Rodriguez a lot (can see the Hurricanes [Jarvis] and Panthers with a mustache player to get the fans into it)--I also like Golday (WLB?).  However, take a look at smallish Kyle Louis (Pitt).  He is known to be cerebral, but he is small (5'11" I think) and for that, I moved him lower.  But look at the different LB events at the combine--he is near the top in most of them.  I see him as a sleeper.  So if we wait until the second round, we can get a solid LB.   So what if we grab a free agent edge specialist (veteran) for pass situations and help develop Princely.  We draft FS (Oregon) first--maybe trading back to do so--I dunno.  We sign a free agent ILB and draft a rookie like Rodriguez or Louis.  In the third, we could probably find a center, like (former OT Parker from Duke) or Slaughter or Pew (may have to trade up).   So, as you say, others are fighting for Edge players, WRs, and OTs early like seagulls on the beach fighting over spilled corn chips, We sit back, grab intelligent players that make others better.  FS, ILB, and C. OT scares me more that Edge if we do this--but for those screaming for an edge--we have edge players--2 with starting experience who have had some degree of success.  JC Davis can play either T spot and he is good at pass blocking--a bit raw--but could be developmental depth that could play in a pinch. Or you could draft a solid OT with shorter arms that are driving them down into day 3--and convert them to G or C later.  Nijman and BC being re-signed could provide enough to hold down the job until a developmental OT (World, Oregon?) prepares for a shot at it.  Wagner (ND) could play LT but is probably a future RT--he is expected to be drafted early day 3.  My favorite day 3 OT sleeper?  Keagan Trost, Missouri. Great run blocker, soild pass blocker in SEC--just shorter arms.  Maybe a guard down the road, but for the time being, a T.  Not ideal, but at least you are building for the future.  
    • I'm not like most people in this thread in regards to Love. I'm not like most in regards to RBs either. I think certain ones will always be drafted in the first round because they are valued that highly. From an on-the-field perspective, they are as valued as ever; business-wise and contract-wise at times to re-up, that's where things can get tricky with valuation. That being said, Love oozes potential and makes higher-ups' mouths water. I know that he if somehow he is available at 19, he will be considered if not taken. You don't leave that type of talent on the board unless there is another compelling player of arguably equal or more value at another position of need that may have a higher priority (like maybe Sonny Styles). Now all that being said, I  don't realistically see either one of them being there at 19 according to the draftniks.
×
×
  • Create New...