Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

2024 College Football Thread


KingKucci
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, Shocker said:

Taking out the two QBs (have to a assume they go before us atp)

Hunter

Graham

McMillan

Carter

Johnson

Walker

Those are top players and not reaches at 8

I think New England goes OT personally but who knows 

I personally think that two Left Tackles get draft before. Banks from Texas is really good. I’ll be watching him tonight against the Ohio State D. If two QBs and two OTs goes ahead of us we will sitting pretty to get a top talent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Shocker said:

This was honestly a very bad choice IMO.  Miami is losing most of there better players on offense.  He could have raised his stock elsewhere but whatever 

Yeah,  Ward was also carrying a huge load. Beck couldn’t have stepped in and kept the ship sailing if they kept everyone.   

isn’t his girlfriend at Miami? Seems like a poor business decision 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CRA said:

Yeah,  Ward was also carrying a huge load. Beck couldn’t have stepped in and kept the ship sailing if they kept everyone.   

isn’t his girlfriend at Miami? Seems like a poor business decision 

Oh now I get it.  He is letting Russell drive the bus

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Miller being less raw and more pro ready makes sense of why they picked him. With us having a capable starter in Walker the lower floor higher ceiling player makes sense for us as well. I agree with that. 
    • I'm from Michigan and have had this discussion with my Lions friends, and they all agree with me, they were never going to take Freeling over Miller.  As, yes, you are correct, they could have left Sewell at RT and taken Freeling, but they are in a SB contention window right now. An OL with Freeling at LT and Sewell at RT is not as strong as Sewell at LT and Miller at RT would be for this upcoming season and likely at least next year as well. 5 years it could be looked back upon as a long term "mistake" to take Miller over Freeling, but for a franchise like the Lions, you can't worry about the long term when you have current SB aspirations.  It's all about maximizing their current SB window over the next 1-3 years. And it's not about style, it's about day 1 readiness, and a lot of "experts" aren't even sure if Freeling is ready to play Week 1 yet at the position he's used to, let alone switching to a side he hasn't played before, but a career starting RT is going to be more than ready to fill that role for them Week 1. I'm 100% convinced that if our draft positioning was swapped, we'd have still taken Freeling, they'd have still taken Miller, and both teams would have got the OT that they preferred due to what each team needs right now and what their current realistic aspirations are for the 2026 season. We're in a position where we can let our drafted OT sit and learn for a bit, they needed a week 1 starter, for me that's where this discussion becomes very easy to understand why each team took the player they did.
×
×
  • Create New...