Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Hypothetical say we get the #1 pick.


Recommended Posts

100% you take Dak and 2 1st round picks. No brainer.  HERE WE GOOOOOO! 

then you let Dallas join the recent list of foolish teams that traded away the farm for a lotto ticket QB.  

  • Pie 2
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CRA said:

100% you take Dak and 2 1st round picks. No brainer.  HERE WE GOOOOOO! 

then you let Dallas join the recent list of foolish teams that traded away the farm for a lotto ticket QB.  

I agree. Not sure how it work salary cap wise, but if we taking on that contract I would expect those 2 future 1st round picks would be a must in any conversation.

 

Dak isn't the best QB, but I think he could make us a playoff team if we build this team the right way and start adding legit talent with those picks.

 

I only thought of this because there is no chance Shedeur wants to play here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, CamWhoaaCam said:

I agree. Not sure how it work salary cap wise, but if we taking on that contract I would expect those 2 future 1st round picks would be a must in any conversation.

 

Dak isn't the best QB, but I think he could make us a playoff team if we build this team the right way and start adding legit talent with those picks.

 

I only thought of this because there is no chance Shedeur wants to play here.

Dak is good enough for us to be decent and entertaining.  Which is a destination we have been far from for a long time.  Plus, given our lack of talent….those first would be huge for us. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

With a very important high draft pick incoming. After watching how Washington has completely changed their direction Tepper has to look at that as an example. He has to start with figuring out how to ID an up in coming GM and do and say what ever he needs to do to get the hire. Then that's it, stay out of his way. If the GM hires some coach you think is a terd you say nothing and stick with it until the GM makes a change. Washington fans were livid with the Quinn hire but even as a D coach he has had an awesome plan for their rookie QB that the fans did not see coming.

This is why I was livid when some were talking about they did not care if Tepper pulled Young. Tepper can not be making calls like that whether we agree or disagree period.......sorry rant over!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Make it a 3 way deal like in baseball. Let someone else take Dax I don't want him for that kind of money.

As far as picking our quarterbacks I am yelling this to whom it may concern:

IF YOU LOBBIED TO CHOOSE BRYCE YOUNG AS THE TOP QUARTERBACK.....

STFU ABOUT QUARTERBACKS IN ROUND 1. TALK ABOUT WHO WE TAKE IN ROUND 2. 

Edited by strato
  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, CRA said:

Dak is good enough for us to be decent and entertaining.  Which is a destination we have been far from for a long time.  Plus, given our lack of talent….those first would be huge for us. 

For sure. Dak is a pro bowl caliber QB. It's not like we getting a bum QB in return. Dak can play the position. Hell with less pressure maybe he balls out in the smaller market. I would love this deal for us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Seriously?  When Dalton started against the Raiders and put up 300 yards and 3 TDs, this board was collectively BUZZING with excitement.  Even a lot of people who get accused of being Bryce "stans" (i.e. people who were simply willing to be a bit more patient with him) were ecstatic at seeing a functional offense for once and were ready to close the book on Bryce.  Who the hell was making excuses and saying it was against a bad defense?  The problem with you guys is you'll take a single standalone comment made by the biggest most radical Bryce fan in the galaxy and then generalize it as "Bryce stans said _________" to be sensational rather than engage with the vast majority of people giving more rational and levelheaded pushback.  I don't even think there are more than one or two people who have a positive emotional attachment to Bryce as an individual...most of the people you call "stans", are people who just generally adopt a more optimistic mindset and therefore are more defensive of our players and staff and will often give them the benefit of the doubt and root for their success (because that's in the team's best interest).  I mean I'm one of those people...and I guarantee you the minute Bryce gets cut (hypothetically), I will have zero care for his career at that point. It's also ironic that you so freely call people Bryce stans but you pearl-clutch at the notion that he has haters.  It's two sides of the same coin, dawg.  If we're to use your standards, then the bar for being considered a "stan" is subterranean, and the bar for being considered a "hater" is apparently somewhere approaching deep space.  If we were to put your post history up against the Final Boss of all Bryce stans (hell, the 10 biggest Bryce stans in Huddle history), your negative posts would outnumber their positive posts like easily 20:1.  So yeah I have no clue what the criteria is at this point.  Speaking of your post history...anyone can feel free to pop in there to see all the wonderful genuine praise you've been giving Bryce.  I mean they don't even need to look at your post history...you showed an example of what your praise looks like in your post I'm quoting now.  Let's paraphrase: he technically improved.....because he was just that awful early in the year, it's basically impossible not to improve.  And yeah maybe he threw some dimes....IT'S ABOUT TIME!  TOOK LONG ENOUGH!!  You see how even your praise needs to be couched in jabs?  It's like a compliment sandwich that gets jammed in between two slices of insults.
    • My man really just dropped the bag. Couldn't cut the crap for 6 months so you could secure generational wealth for you and your family. What a shame. 
    • This should be in the NFL rule book. 
×
×
  • Create New...