Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Would you take a chance on Cam Ward?


Jmac
 Share

Recommended Posts

If we don't have a top 3 pick maybe.

 

Pretty confident Sanders will be the 1st QB off the board due to the fact he's played with a bad Oline for most of his time at Colorado. He's also shown the ability to be clutch even without his top 3 WRs. Love him or hate him you can't deny his talent.

 

I want a all defensive draft. Maybe Tmac if we can't sign Johnson long-term.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

TBH, not in the first round. I think he is a relatively limited ceiling prospect. High floor but not a guy I would take in the 1st. To be clear, very few of this QB class would I consider first rounders.

Best case scenario we get the #1 pick and the Raiders give us a package similar to what we gave Chicago so they can draft Sanders.

 

I will keep saying it watch out for Brady and the Sanders connection. They have a relationship and he's now part owner. He was taking pictures with the Raiders owner at the game a few weeks ago. The Raiders want Sanders.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

Best case scenario we get the #1 pick and the Raiders give us a package similar to what we gave Chicago so they can draft Sanders.

 

I will keep saying it watch out for Brady and the Sanders connection. They have a relationship and he's now part owner. He was taking pictures with the Raiders owner at the game a few weeks ago. The Raiders want Sanders.

Yeah, I mean.....I keep saying this because we are the Panthers but I am very reticent to trade down unless it's a haul. I am scarred by all the terrible draft trading we have done over the past few years. Of course one could certainly argue that doesn't really absolve us from the awful picks. 

And even in the number one overall scenario, we botched it.

I just want to see us get a quality top 10 pick again. It's been too long.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yeah they were bad QBs - but QB's that stayed on their teams for several years.  BY is better than all of those. 
    • This is the right move even if you think Bryce isn't the future. Everything except signing him to a long term deal until proven otherwise. There's a decent chance we have a shot to draft a QB next year that we like. 
    • If we're still bad enough that Canales gets fired, especially if it's during the season, there is no way we could ever attract any HC worthy of the job if we told them they had to keep Bryce their first year. That would be 2 coaches he's gotten fired and 4 years of not performing up to par. I still say replace both of them next offseason.  I like Canales the man and I think he's done an absolutely outstanding job at fixing our locker room issues, as it was really bad before he showed up.  But I just don't see it from him with his in game decision making, I think he's held us back just as much as Bryce has, just in different ways. Canales was our Dan Campbell, the coach you hire to turn the franchises culture around for the HC after them to inherit and take to the next level.   The difference was he had some elite coordinators early on and really let him focus on his "leader of men" role as opposed to the X's and O's that Canales does himself and it's turned out well for him.
×
×
  • Create New...