Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers agree to 1-year deal with RB Rico Dowdle


Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, jfra78 said:

1 year vet rental means they still like Brooks

and thats pretty fuging stupid, this rb draft class is absolutely loaded and to get one on a cheap 4 year deal is gold, its like Morgan is doubling down on his stupidity and not taking the L in brooks

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 3
  • Flames 1
  • Poo 8
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Panthers: We need a RB! Let's taken the best RB available despite injuries in a very weak RB draft! Also, how about in the 2nd round!

Also Panthers: Let's pay $6.5 mil on a one year deal to an above average FA RB! Also, let's do this in a RB draft class that is one of the deepest since 2003! 

Sean Flanagan Party GIF by FoilArmsandHog

  • Pie 5
  • Flames 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, kungfoodude said:

Panthers: We need a RB! Let's taken the best RB available despite injuries in a very weak RB draft! Also, how about in the 2nd round!

Also Panthers: Let's pay $6.5 mil on a one year deal to an above average FA RB! Also, let's do this in a RB draft class that is one of the deepest since 2003! 

Sean Flanagan Party GIF by FoilArmsandHog

Its fuging nuts

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Irony yes you could say that as long as there is no intent to claim that because he left we all of a sudden got so bad we are losing all the time. Which it seems like you might be trying to imply.  Did we lose something? Yes we did. Was it worth 5 years at 28 mil per? Not to my thinking.   
    • https://www.facebook.com/MEMES.of.the.NFL/videos/779983564773360/ LOL 
    • First: What do you think the word ‘scapegoating’ means? Because what I said was not scapegoating.  They are two different players playing two different roles.  I simply said two things about Burns, if I recall. One, basically he is a one dimensional player that is doing well because they have a very strong front in NY.  Two, I was against paying his price because he is a liability against the run. One dimensional and therefore not worth it.  Summing it up: he e is a pass rush specialist, about all I have ever felt about him, and his financial demands made him much less of a value.  IMO. 
×
×
  • Create New...