Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers decision to pass on Walker


kungfoodude
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I don't think it has anything to do with Chinn. I mean, Chinn was a LB/safety tweener where Walker is am EDGE/LB tweener. Really different players and how we used Chinn was really kinda forced on us by our roster. He wasn't good in a deep safety role but he was the best option we had. Now I would argue that we should've still used Chinn where he was most effective but that's just me. I don't see how you're making a D better by misusing one of your better talents.

It does seem like the Raiders are finally starting to use him how he should be used if you're going to play him at safety.

Screenshot_20250509-120024.thumb.png.3fcf1a3154392899690091602ae08b7b.png

I thought he was in washington last year and just got picked up by raiders this off-season.

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, kungfoodude said:

Basically a reflection of Evero's general inflexibility about square pegs in his defense.

Yeah, I just haven't been impressed. Most NFL coaches can do a good job if given great pieces to fit their schemes but the great ones can tailor their schemes to fit the pieces that they have available. The Panthers haven't had any great ones. We've had a bunch of square pegs in round holes type of guys and every now and then we've assembled the right pegs to field some legit squads. Now with that said, what Canales was able to do after Bryce returned from his benching was pretty damn impressive. That actually gives me some hope we might have found a head coach.

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I don't think it has anything to do with Chinn. I mean, Chinn was a LB/safety tweener where Walker is am EDGE/LB tweener. Really different players and how we used Chinn was really kinda forced on us by our roster. He wasn't good in a deep safety role but he was the best option we had. Now I would argue that we should've still used Chinn where he was most effective but that's just me. I don't see how you're making a D better by misusing one of your better talents.

It does seem like the Raiders are finally starting to use him how he should be used if you're going to play him at safety.

Screenshot_20250509-120024.thumb.png.3fcf1a3154392899690091602ae08b7b.png

He hasn't played a snap for the Raiders yet. Those are stats from the Redskins.

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, mrcompletely11 said:

Ive come to accept the Tmac pick, it is what it is, but if we are passing up talent because of our coordinator who is on the hottest of hot seat that seems next level stupid

Eh, TBH, I would rather have had T-Mac than Walker, regardless. 

I was not one that was that high on Walker.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Smitty will punch you said:

Still pains me that Chinn was shown the door like he was a scrub. 

If I am being honest, the fact that he was also shown the door by the Redskins after one season is interesting. But, perhaps that was just the Raiders outbidding them.

 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I said it a million times leading up to the draft, Walker never made any sense to me.

He's a 4-3 OLB who plays mostly off ball but can be used as a situational pass rusher.

If you're taking an OLB when you run a 3-4, they need to be more of a full time pass rusher who has the ability to set the edge and also play DE when you switch up to a 4-3 alignment.

That's just not Walker, he very well may be a great player in the end, but you don't take a 4-3 OLB at #8 when you run a 3-4, square peg meet round hole.

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just think they thought the drop off from TMac to a round 2 WR was greater than Walker to a round 2 edge like we got in Scourton. Remember teams like LAR and SF were trying to trade up for TMac with a similar thought process. 

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ForJimmy said:

I just think they thought the drop off from TMac to a round 2 WR was greater than Walker to a round 2 edge like we got in Scourton. Remember teams like LAR and SF were trying to trade up for TMac with a similar thought process. 

That's absolutely true too, but I also don't think they ever truly considered Walker an edge either.

Just look at who we took and compare them to Walker from a size standpoint, they couldn't be any more different.

If T-Mac was taken before we were on the clock, I still don't think we'd have taken Walker in the end anyways, at least not without a trade back first.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, tukafan21 said:

That's absolutely true too, but I also don't think they ever truly considered Walker an edge either.

Just look at who we took and compare them to Walker from a size standpoint, they couldn't be any more different.

If T-Mac was taken before we were on the clock, I still don't think we'd have taken Walker in the end anyways, at least not without a trade back first.

Makes sense.  I guess you can replace Walker with a bigger edge like Williams and still the same applies.  I'd put Scourton right there with any of them not named Carter.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • From Bluesky: https://bsky.app/profile/nutshellsportz.bsky.social/post/3mo3rkrcezs2e  A look at Run Threat Rate across the NFL Run Threat Rate is the percentage of plays where a team either runs the ball or uses play action. This compares each team’s rate when leading or tied versus when trailing to show how much they abandon the run when playing from behind.
    • That's the current dilemma on both parties at the moment. If Ickey comes back too soon, he won't be 100% and his play will suffer. Leading to a potential decrease in his contract. If Ickey is unable to play and sits the entire 2026 season, his contract will still take the same hit since it tells all 32 team that he is not fully recovered. On the Panthers side, I'm sure they would want to keep Ickey if he is fully recovered but he is obviously in a contract year. They don't want to re-sign him to a massive deal since it be too risky and they know if Ickey is able to return to form.  Best case scenario, the Panthers wants to offer Ickey a 1-2 year heavily incentive based prove it deal. However, Ickey would most likely decline the offer and test the market as  another team can come in and offer Ickey a better deal if they are desperate enough for O-line help.
    • They have been giving him a lot of snaps at RT to give TMo some relief in camp. I think that will continue for the time being.
×
×
  • Create New...