Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Canes vs Panthers Rd 3 Gm3 8pm

Panthers Fan 69

By Panthers Fan 69,
in Carolina Hurricanes

 Share

Recommended Posts

PNW_PantherMan Grand Master

PNW_PantherMan

Posted
Posted
Just now, carpanfan96 said:

Trade Morrow and KK for draft picks. 

Then take 36m in cap space and turn it into 1 top 4 defenseman and 3 top 6 forwards. 

Morrow has upside but who is gonna wanna play KK lmao.  Dude was straight ass this year on the power play.  Someone want him for their 4th line? 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
carpanfan96 Grand Master

carpanfan96

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, PNW_PantherMan said:

Morrow has upside but who is gonna wanna play KK lmao.  Dude was straight ass this year on the power play.  Someone want him for their 4th line? 

That's why Morrow is included. lol

Only expecting a 3rd or 4th round pick back. It's mainly to clear space. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
carpanfan96 Grand Master

carpanfan96

Posted
Posted

You could give Bennett 10m, Elhers 8m and Marner 13m and give a defensemen 4m and have a little bit of space left over. Bam, got a new top 6 and a new top 4 pairing. 

 

Marner, Aho, Jarvis

Svechnikov, Bennett, Elhers

Martinook, Staal, Stankoven 

Blake, Roslovic, Carrier 

 

Slavin Walker

Nikishin Chatfield 

FA signing Ghosty

 

PP1

Marner, Aho, Jarvis, Svechnikov, Ghosty

PP2

Elhers, Bennett, Blake, Stankoven, Nikishin 

 

Looks pretty good to me. lol

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
DamnItJake! Grand Master

DamnItJake!

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, MillionDollarCam said:

We played our division which was terrible. This year will be the year someone argues for reseeding.

If the playoffs were seeded by points we would have played Florida in the first round.

Well I don’t follow all the other teams, so I can’t argue on how much better they are.. I just know we the Canes did great and overcame so tough games until now.. as far as reseeding the NFL said no.. so should the NHL.. this isn’t the NBA

Link to comment
Share on other sites
PNW_PantherMan Grand Master

PNW_PantherMan

Posted
Posted
47 minutes ago, DamnItJake! said:

Well I don’t follow all the other teams, so I can’t argue on how much better they are.. I just know we the Canes did great and overcame so tough games until now.. as far as reseeding the NFL said no.. so should the NHL.. this isn’t the NBA

The NHL used to seed the playoffs by 1-8 in the points rankings for each conference.  Now they are seeded in a way where you play out of your division in the bracket.  We play in the weakest division in the NHL.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
KillerKat Grand Master

KillerKat

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, carpanfan96 said:

You could give Bennett 10m, Elhers 8m and Marner 13m and give a defensemen 4m and have a little bit of space left over. Bam, got a new top 6 and a new top 4 pairing. 

 

Marner, Aho, Jarvis

Svechnikov, Bennett, Elhers

Martinook, Staal, Stankoven 

Blake, Roslovic, Carrier 

 

Slavin Walker

Nikishin Chatfield 

FA signing Ghosty

 

PP1

Marner, Aho, Jarvis, Svechnikov, Ghosty

PP2

Elhers, Bennett, Blake, Stankoven, Nikishin 

 

Looks pretty good to me. lol

Yeah but if RBA is still coach, it wouldnt matter.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
carpanfan96 Grand Master

carpanfan96

Posted
Posted (edited)
42 minutes ago, KillerKat said:

Yeah but if RBA is still coach, it wouldnt matter.

I'm hoping what I heard is true. Lmfao 

 

We will find out soon enough though because if true the rumors will run rampant after the Canes are eliminated. 

Edited by carpanfan96
  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
TLGPanthersFan Grand Master

TLGPanthersFan

Posted
Posted (edited)
7 hours ago, PNW_PantherMan said:

The NHL used to seed the playoffs by 1-8 in the points rankings for each conference.  Now they are seeded in a way where you play out of your division in the bracket.  We play in the weakest division in the NHL.

In that seeding Canes would be the 4th seed and would either face the Panthers or Canadians in round one. 
 

Edited by TLGPanthersFan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • DaveThePanther2008
      Panthers OLB Pat Jones II makes bold claim about team's defense

      By DaveThePanther2008 · Posted

      It's not impossible to go from worst to first.  We kept Evero because anyone in there right mind knew our defense was destroyed by injuries, not the scheme.  Evero has been given a plethora of talent between free agency and the draft, not to mention getting DB back. I fully expect our defense to be very good.  I have no reason to think Jones would say something like that unless he truly felt like that.   
    • PNW_PantherMan
      Canes vs Panthers Rd 3 Gm3 8pm

      By PNW_PantherMan · Posted

      We would’ve played Florida and lost in the 1st instead of the 3rd round.  Montreal would have been the 8 seed.
    • Icege
      PFF ranks the 2025 starting QBs

      By Icege · Posted

      I can't get behind a purely subjective re-draft as a method of defining "top-10 QB" status. That invites bias based on vibes/hypotheticals and can ignore actual on-field performance. You and others have said that Bryce has to be a top-10 QB to justify the pick. That's a high bar, which I'm not against, but we need a clear, consistent way to measure it. When I bring up metrics that Bryce has registered in the top-10 in like BTT%, P2S ratio, catchable deep ball rate, etc... they're waved off as either irrelevant or the expected baseline performance. Meanwhile, volume stats like passing yards or win-loss records, both of which depend heavily on roster talent, health, and coaching, are treated as definitive. That's where the inconsistency kicks in. If no performance metric ever counts in his favor and the answer is always going to be "he should be doing that," then we're not evaluating him... we're just holding him to a curve he can't win against. If this is really about performance standards, then let's define them. But if it's just about confirming prior takes based on height and weight, then let's call it what is it and stop pretending that this is a football analysis discussion.
×
×
  • Create New...