Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Wed news and notes


Captain Morgan
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, Bear Hands said:

thanks @Captain Morgan as always with the updates

I'm digging what I'm hearing about Demani Richardson.  He's the guy not talked about as much.  It seems they've got a good grip on what they have with him after a lot of playing time to close out 2024.  Seems to have trust and I'm hearing good stuff.    

 

The only thing confusing about the safety group to me is redundancy.  Moehrig, Richardson, and Ransom all look to be good and potentially good box safeties.  We never really got that ball hawking FS we needed IMO.  It might still work out, but whoever is playing FS would be playing a position that doesn't fully play to their strengths IMO.  

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Captain Morgan said:

Alex Zietlow
@alexzietlow05
·
4h
#Panthers kicker Matthew Wright goes 5-for-5 on field goals (with the skinny posts). Final field goal is from 50-plus yards out.

Andy Dalton serves as the field goal holder in Sam Martin’s absence, for those concerned.


Alex Zietlow
@alexzietlow05
·
2h
I've been informed that he actually went 4-of-5 ... and that 
@mike_e_kaye
 caught his sole miss. Sorry for the error.

 

Getting Gano/Butker vibes here

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, ForJimmy said:

You just don't typically touch QBs in this stage of practice.  A broken hand/finger from his throwing arm can really jeopardize a season.  

Wasn’t talking about the action, I meant literally the podium talk. It doesn’t matter at all, just thought odd he even said anything about it to the press 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, ForJimmy said:

The only thing confusing about the safety group to me is redundancy.  Moehrig, Richardson, and Ransom all look to be good and potentially good box safeties.  We never really got that ball hawking FS we needed IMO.  It might still work out, but whoever is playing FS would be playing a position that doesn't fully play to their strengths IMO.  

With Evero's high zone looks, it's all based around disguises in the secondary as much as the front 7 with a bandit-type approach. So it makes sense to have guys that have some fluidity that can play houdini technique on QBs.   Therefore, I think it's smarter to load up on SS these days who have those instincts and smarts. You can use them interchangeably whereas if a guy is an FS-- you know he's getting FS deep assignments.       

In my view, the FS is the least valuable position in the lineup these days.  I firmly believe a SS can play FS much more easily than a FS can play SS.  FSs have that outfielder poacher mentality but don't see the short field as well and usually don't have the quickness, which is why they're back there.  SSs have the quickness and alertness to play both spots. They mess around with man assignments, drop back into deep zone and have delayed blitzes in these Fangio-inspired high zone defenses.  We also play 3 deep at times, where we play cover-3 but disguised as cover-2.  So it's good to have a backlog of this prototype.        

So with our personnel, you have SS guys who can play off eachother to bait QBs in our two-high zone looks, it's super valuable disguising who is playing high zone and who has a delayed play in the box. 

I think the playmaker in these defenses becomes the nickel and dime more of the time because its the safeties and LBs baiting and disguising while they're sneakily getting the right look in the field of play for INTs.

Just my two cents.       

  • Pie 5
  • Beer 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Bear Hands said:

With Evero's high zone looks, it's all based around disguises in the secondary as much as the front 7 with a bandit-type approach. So it makes sense to have guys that have some fluidity that can play houdini technique on QBs.   Therefore, I think it's smarter to load up on SS these days who have those instincts and smarts. You can use them interchangeably whereas if a guy is an FS-- you know he's getting FS deep assignments.       

In my view, the FS is the least valuable position in the lineup these days.  I firmly believe a SS can play FS much more easily than a FS can play SS.  FSs have that outfielder poacher mentality but don't see the short field as well and usually don't have the quickness, which is why they're back there.  SSs have the quickness and alertness to play both spots. They mess around with man assignments, drop back into deep zone and have delayed blitzes in these Fangio-inspired high zone defenses.  We also play 3 deep at times, where we play cover-3 but disguised as cover-2.  So it's good to have a backlog of this prototype.        

So with our personnel, you have SS guys who can play off eachother to bait QBs in our two-high zone looks, it's super valuable disguising who is playing high zone and who has a delayed play in the box. 

I think the playmaker in these defenses becomes the nickel and dime more of the time because its the safeties and LBs baiting and disguising while they're sneakily getting the right look in the field of play for INTs.

Just my two cents.       

Makes sense. I guess I stuck in the old traditional defenses. Always appreciate your insight. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Bear Hands said:

With Evero's high zone looks, it's all based around disguises in the secondary as much as the front 7 with a bandit-type approach. So it makes sense to have guys that have some fluidity that can play houdini technique on QBs.   Therefore, I think it's smarter to load up on SS these days who have those instincts and smarts. You can use them interchangeably whereas if a guy is an FS-- you know he's getting FS deep assignments.       

In my view, the FS is the least valuable position in the lineup these days.  I firmly believe a SS can play FS much more easily than a FS can play SS.  FSs have that outfielder poacher mentality but don't see the short field as well and usually don't have the quickness, which is why they're back there.  SSs have the quickness and alertness to play both spots. They mess around with man assignments, drop back into deep zone and have delayed blitzes in these Fangio-inspired high zone defenses.  We also play 3 deep at times, where we play cover-3 but disguised as cover-2.  So it's good to have a backlog of this prototype.        

So with our personnel, you have SS guys who can play off eachother to bait QBs in our two-high zone looks, it's super valuable disguising who is playing high zone and who has a delayed play in the box. 

I think the playmaker in these defenses becomes the nickel and dime more of the time because its the safeties and LBs baiting and disguising while they're sneakily getting the right look in the field of play for INTs.

Just my two cents.       

Houdini or Cena? 🤔

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, jb2288 said:

i love Canales, but this is a weird one lol

Brock Purdy snapped his UCL on a similar play.

I think Bryce will need this in training camp though. It will do nothing but make him better moving forward so I say let them contact, just preferably avoid the arm once he's throwing. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • And this reiterates why I don’t want a Young contract extension. Please let us find another QB. 
    • Oh, the high expectations after a draft. Keep your expectations low, people. Darin Gantt's latest "Ask The Old Guy" gives life to one of those lessons about pro football reality as a fan: "Rasheed Walker was a three-year starter at left tackle for the Packers, so Freeling is going to have to work. Hunter's got another big 'un in front of him in Bobby Brown III and a different kind of defensive tackle in Tershawn Wharton. Chris Brazzell II's got a lot of traffic at his position. Zakee Wheatley has to be better than the chronically underappreciated Nick Scott, and Sam Hecht is a fifth-round rookie at the hardest position on the line to play, who probably doesn't have immediate positional flexibility, and a solid free agent addition in Luke Fortner in front of him. "Fans generally love their draft class as soon as it arrives, because there is no evidence to the contrary yet. Once guys get on the field, the reality begins to creep in, and the seasoned among you remember that if you get three or four good players out of a draft, that was an amazing draft." https://www.panthers.com/news/ask-the-old-guy-things-looking-up-after-the-draft-monroe-freeling-luke-kuechly-bryce-young-derrick-brown Don't get crazy. Winning the draft (or the offseason BTW) on paper always leads to good feelings and great expectations, especially when you seemingly succeeded the season before, but let's remember that the Panthers are very much a work in progress. Team building takes time. If we get a couple of starters out of the draft, it's a good draft, but three or four would be an amazing draft, and anything more than that is actually sensational--even if entails a few multiple high end rotational players along with three starters. Moreover, kind of within that same vein, the coaches have to let the kids off the chain. Remember the coach-speak of past coaches about competition that is anything but because coaches have their notions about veteran experience? Not saying that they're necessarily wrong, but sometimes I think their reluctance to put the young guys out there is based somewhat in dogma or possibly fear because big stakes are on the line (e.g., their jobs). It can be frustrating to say the least, but the coaches are supposed to know best. Again, I say all of this so that we can remember to temper expectations and keep them within the realm of reality. It's like telling your mind to think of it as something akin to under-promising and over-delivering. Leave room to be pleasantly surprised for the best case scenario, but be cognizant that that rarely happens. I would think at this point, most of us should be able to recognize growth when we see it, and sometimes that growth doesn't manifest itself in the form of immediate supremacy, but a setting of the stage for long term dominance for years to come. It seems like we're on track for an emergence by 2028 or 2029. We still have huge questions, but by 2029, hopefully we will take our seat at the table of the perennial contenders in the NFL.  
    • You’re playing madden we’re talking real football stuff…. He does have you seen his special on internet he def thinks he’s getting paid 
×
×
  • Create New...